| Literature DB >> 2843950 |
W Wichmann1, O Schubiger, A Valavanis, K Kasdaglis.
Abstract
The MR and CT findings of 24 surgically verified cases with clinical and neuroradiological evidence for pituitary microadenomas were compared. In 18 patients the preoperative diagnosis was surgically confirmed. In 6 cases the preoperative diagnosis proved to be wrong at operation. In 18 cases with confirmed diagnosis MR proved more sensitive than CT, whereas in the 6 cases with wrong diagnosis both methods proved to be of equal sensitivity. It is concluded that MR is superior to CT for the evaluation of pituitary microadenomas, provided that high-field and special examination techniques including thin, overlapping sections and enhancement with GD-DTPA are used.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1988 PMID: 2843950 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1048334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rofo ISSN: 1438-9010