| Literature DB >> 28439310 |
D E Kramer1, M X Cleary2, P E Miller1, Y-M Yen1, B J Shore1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review all paediatric ankle syndesmotic injuries occurring at our institution and identify risk factors associated with operative intervention.Entities:
Keywords: ankle injury; paediatric injury; sports medicine; syndesmosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28439310 PMCID: PMC5382337 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.11.160180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Characteristics of the cohort.
| Characteristic | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 115 (52) |
| Age at injury (yrs) | |
| 8 to 12 | 20 (9) |
| 13 to 15 | 84 (38) |
| 16 to 18 | 116 (53) |
| Mean age (± sd) | 15.8 (± 1.9) |
| Injury side | |
| Right | 116 (52) |
| BMI (n = 172) | |
| < 25 | 110 (64) |
| 25 - < 30 | 35 (20) |
| ≥30 | 27 (16) |
| Mean (± sd) | 24.5 (±5.4) |
| History of prior injury? (n = 217) | |
| Yes | 31 (14) |
| Distal tibial physis (n = 174) | |
| Closed | 131 (75) |
| Unable to bear weight (n = 178) | 88 (49) |
| Swelling (n = 199) | 165 (83) |
| Tender over syndesmosis (n = 131) | 108 (82) |
| Associated fracture | 102 (46) |
| Other ligament injury | 77 (35) |
| Mechanism of injury | |
| Sports | 168 (76) |
| Contact injury | 44/168 (27) |
| Outdoor field sport | 77/168 (46) |
| Fall | 34 (15) |
| Motor vehicle accident | 4 (2) |
| Other | 14 (6) |
n = 220 except where otherwise noted.
Fig. 1Flow chart showing the study population.
Definitions for radiographic syndesmotic diastasis based on adult criteria.[3,8-11]
| Radiographic criteria | Normal | Abnormal |
|---|---|---|
| Tibiofibular overlap | > 6 mm (AP) | > 1 mm (mortise) |
| < 6 mm (AP) | < 1 mm (mortise) | |
| Tibiofibular clear space | < 6 mm (AP/mortise) | > 6 mm (AP/mortise) |
| Medial clear space | < 4 mm (mortise) | > 4 mm (mortise) |
AP, anteroposterior.
Fig. 2(a) Mortise view of a 15-year-old male following external rotation injury which shows widening of the tibiofibular (TF) clear space and MCS. (b) Mortise view of a 16-year-old male with a Weber C diaphyseal fracture which shows significant widening of the TF clear space and MCS. (c) Anteroposterior radiograph of a 17-year-old female which shows a normal TF overlap.
Summary of ankle fractures in our cohort (82/220, 37%).
| Fracture type | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Fibular fracture (all types) | 78 (95) |
| Infrasyndesmotic (Weber A) fractures | 1 (1) |
| At syndesmosis level (Weber B) fractures | 9 (11) |
| Above the syndesmosis (Weber C) fractures | 62 (76) |
| Weber C isolated | 34 |
| Weber C + medial malleolus | 12 |
| Weber C + posterior malleolus | 3 |
| Weber C + posterior + medial malleolus | 5 |
| Weber C + distal tibia | 1 |
| Proximal fibular (Maisonneuve) fracture | 7 |
| Fibular physeal fracture | 6 (7) |
| Isolated distal tibial fracture | 4 (5) |
Analysis of risk factors for surgical intervention.
| Surgical treatment (n = 82) | Non-surgical treatment (n = 138) | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at injury (yrs) | |||||
| 8 to 12 | 2 | (13%) | 18 | (2%) | 0.03 |
| 13 to 15 | 33 | (37%) | 51 | (40%) | |
| 16 to 18 | 47 | (50%) | 69 | (57%) | |
| Mean ± sd | 16.1 | ± 1.51 | 15.6 | ± 2.13 | 0.04 |
| Unable to weight-bear | 46 | (85%) | 42 | (34%) | < 0.001 |
| Associated fracture | 76 | (93%) | 26 | (19%) | < 0.001 |
| Open distal tibia physis | 9 | (15%) | 34 | (30%) | 0.02 |
| TF clear space (mm) | 6.0 | ± 3.61 | 4.6 | ± 1.45 | 0.002 |
| TF overlap (mm) | 5.4 | ± 3.78 | 6.9 | ± 2.44 | 0.004 |
| TF clear space (mm) | 7.8 | ± 4.90 | 5.3 | ± 1.41 | < 0.001 |
| TF overlap (mm) | 1.3 | ± 1.81 | 2.3 | ± 2.01 | 0.003 |
| MCS (mm) | 6.4 | ± 2.72 | 3.5 | ± 0.88 | < 0.001 |
only 178 subjects had data with respect to their ability to bear weight. Denominators for surgical and non-surgical groups are 54 and 124, respectively.
AP, anteroposterior; TF, tibiofibular; MCS, medial clear space.
ROC analysis with sensitivity and sensitivity for each radiographic measurement and cutoff.
| AUC | 95% CI | Abnormal | Specificity | Sensitivity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medial clear space (M) | 0.87 | (0.80-0.94) | > 5 mm | 93.0% | 62.2% |
| TF clear space (M) | 0.76 | (0.68-0.85) | > 7 mm | 87.9% | 48.1% |
| TF overlap (M) | 0.68 | (0.59-0.77) | < 1 mm | 74.7% | 59.3% |
| TF clear space (AP) | 0.63 | (0.54-0.73) | > 6 mm | 85.3% | 46.6% |
| TF overlap (AP) | 0.62 | (0.53-0.72) | < 4 mm | 91.7% | 39.7% |
AUC, area under curve; M, mortise view; TF, tibiofibular; AP, anteroposterior view.
Comparison of risk factors for surgical intervention.
| Surgical treatment | Non-surgical treatment | p | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | Odds ratio | |||||
| Associated fracture | 76 | (93%) | 26 | (19%) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 44.2 (11.1-176.1) |
| Open distal tibia physis | 9 | (15%) | 34 | (30%) | 0.03 | 0.01 | 5.4 (1.4-21.6) |
| TF clear space > 7 mm | 26 | (48%) | 13 | (12%) | < 0.001 | 0.08 | 3.8 (0.8-17.3) |
| Medial clear space > 5 mm | 28 | (62%) | 7 | (7%) | < 0.001 | 0.001 | 7.9 (2.0-30.3) |
| TF overlap < 1 mm | 30 | (56%) | 26 | (24%) | < 0.001 | ||
| TF clear space > 6 mm | 27 | (47%) | 16 | (15%) | < 0.001 | ||
| TF overlap < 4 mm | 23 | (40%) | 9 | (8%) | < 0.001 | ||
based on the final multivariable logistic regression model for surgical intervention.
CI, confidence interval; TF, tibiofibular; AP, anteroposterior
Probability algorithm for surgical intervention.
| Fracture | Closed physis | MCS (mortise) > 5 mm | TF clear space > 7 mm (mortise) | Predicted probability | Operative incidence | Overall incidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 98% | 100% | 16% |
| Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 93% | 89% | 6% |
| Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 85% | 100% | 1% |
| Yes | Yes | No | No | 57% | 42% | 8% |
| Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 89% | 0% | |
| Yes | No | Yes | No | 66% | 67% | 4% |
| Yes | No | No | Yes | 47% | 0% | 2% |
| Yes | No | No | No | 17% | 0% | 4% |
| No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 46% | 0% | 1% |
| No | Yes | Yes | No | 17% | 0% | 3% |
| No | Yes | No | Yes | 8% | 0% | 6% |
| No | Yes | No | No | 2% | 4% | 35% |
| No | No | Yes | Yes | 12% | 0% | 1% |
| No | No | Yes | No | 3% | 0% | 3% |
| No | No | No | Yes | 1% | 33% | 2% |
| No | No | No | No | 0.3% | 0% | 7% |
Overall incidence is the percentage of subjects that presented with that combination of predictor variables.
Operative incidence is the percentage of subjects that we operated on with the corresponding predictor variables.
probabilities are based on the tested and validated logistic regression model.
MCS, medial clear space; TF, tibiofibular