| Literature DB >> 28439292 |
Xiaofeng Xu1, Yong Tan2, Guorong Jiang3, Xuanyi Chen1, Rensheng Lai4, Lurong Zhang3, Guoqiang Liang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bushen Tianjing Recipe (BTR) is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine that has been prescribed for premature ovarian failure (POF) for decades in China. Nevertheless, little is known regarding its underlying molecular mechanism. In the present study, we investigated the effects of BTR in a tripterygium glycoside (TG)-induced-POF rat model.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; Apoptosis; Bushen Tianjing Recipe; Premature ovarian failure; Tripterygium glycoside
Year: 2017 PMID: 28439292 PMCID: PMC5402324 DOI: 10.1186/s13020-017-0131-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 5.455
The components of Bushen Tianjing Recipe
| Components | Chinese name | Origin | Amount used (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehmanniae Radix Praeparata | Shu Di Huang |
| 10 |
| Testudinis Carapax et Plastrum | Gui Jia |
| 10 |
| Paeoniae Radix Alba | Bai Shao |
| 10 |
| Corni Fructus | Shan Yu Rou |
| 10 |
Quality evaluation of BTR
| Major constituents | Method of determination | Quality specifications |
|---|---|---|
| Catalpol | HPLC | >50 mg per 10 g BTR |
| Paeoniflorin | HPLC | >0.2 g per 10 g BTR |
| Morroniside | HPLC | >50 mg per 10 g BTR |
|
| TLC | Arginine contained |
HPLC high performance liquid chromatogram, TLC thin-layer chromatography
Drug dose and administration schedule for each group of animals
| Group | Drug dose and administration schedule |
|---|---|
| Control | 4 ml 0.9% saline twice daily (9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.), i.g., for 15 days |
| POF model | TG at 50 mg/kg, i.g. at 9:00 a.m. plus 4 ml 0.9% saline, i.g. at 3:00 p.m., for 15 days |
| BTR-low | TG at 50 mg/kg, i.g. at 9:00 a.m. plus BTR at 1.88 g/kg, i.g. at 3:00 p.m., for 15 days |
| BTR-medium | TG at 50 mg/kg, i.g. at 9:00 a.m. plus BTR at 3.75 g/kg, i.g. at 3:00 p.m., for 15 days |
| BTR-high | TG at 50 mg/kg, i.g. at 9:00 a.m. plus BTR at 7.50 g/kg, i.g. at 3:00 p.m., for 15 days |
POF premature ovarian failure, TG tripterygium glycoside, BTR Bushen Tianjing Recipe, i.g. intragastric gavage, AM in the morning, PM in the afternoon
Fig. 1The length of the estrous cycle (a) and ovary index (b) in different treatment groups. Each dot in a and b represents the length of estrous cycle during the 15-day administration period and the ovary index at the end of administration for an individual animal, respectively. When the number of estrous cycles ≥2, the mean value is presented. Bars and error bars are means and SD. All statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. NS not significant
Effect of Bushen Tianjing Recipe on serum levels of E2, FSH, P, and T in a TG-induced rat POF model
| Group | Number of animals | E2 (pg/ml)a,b | FSH (μg/ml)a,b | P (ng/ml)a,b | T (pg/dl)a,b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 10 | 643.9 ± 157.9 | 2.52 ± 0.59 | 0.65 ± 0.52 | 6.97 ± 2.52 |
| POF model | 9 | 355.8 ± 130.6* | 8.56 ± 2.13** | 0.95 ± 0.21* | 21.68 ± 9.61** |
| BTR-low | 10 | 364.1 ± 79.8 | 7.85 ± 1.62 | 0.82 ± 0.18# | 12.17 ± 3.20## |
| BTR-medium | 10 | 553.1 ± 107.5## | 3.52 ± 0.75## | 0.59 ± 0.56# | 10.60 ± 4.33## |
| BTR-high | 10 | 578.6 ± 129.0## | 3.57 ± 0.70## | 0.52 ± 0.15# | 7.71 ± 1.24## |
E2 estradiol, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, P progesterone, T testosterone, POF premature ovarian failure, BTR Bushen Tianjing Recipe
aData are presented as mean ± SD
b* P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 versus the control group; # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.01 versus the POF model group
Fig. 2Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained images of histological sections from all experimental groups (a–e). A decrease in the number of primary follicles (as indicated by white arrows) can be seen in the POF model group, while treatment with Bushen Tianjing Recipe achieved a significant improvement in the follicular count. Magnification ×100
Fig. 3Representative immunohistochemistry images (a) and quantitative analysis (b, c) of VEGF and VEGFR2 in histological sections from all experimental groups. Immunostaining (brown) are indicated by black arrows. For each animal, ten random high power fields (HPFs) from five sections were used for quantitative analysis. Each dot in b and c represents the median value across these HPFs. Bars and error bars are medians and quartiles, respectively. All statistical analyses were performed using nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test. NS not significant. Magnification ×100
Fig. 4Quantitative assessment of apoptosis in ovarian tissue samples from different experimental groups. a Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained images and b apoptotic cell counting results. For each animal, ten high power fields (HPFs) were randomly chosen from five sections for counting the number of apoptotic granulosa cells. Each dot in b represents the average value across these HPFs. Bars and error bars are means and SD, respectively. All statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. NS not significant. Magnification ×400
Fig. 5Representative immunohistochemistry images (a) and quantitative analysis (b, c, d) of Bcl-2, Bax, and caspase 3 in histological sections from all experimental groups. Immunostaining (brown) are indicated by black arrows. For each animal, ten random high power fields (HPFs) from five sections were used for quantitative analysis. Each dot in b and c represents the median value across these HPFs. Bars and error bars are medians and quartiles, respectively. All statistical analyses were performed using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test. NS not significant. Magnification ×100