Literature DB >> 28439276

Transcriptome Comparison Reveals the Adaptive Evolution of Two Contrasting Ecotypes of Zn/Cd Hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii Hance.

Qianying Yang1, M J I Shohag1,2, Ying Feng1, Zhenli He3, Xiaoe Yang1.   

Abstract

Hyperaccumulating ecotype (HE) and non-hyperaccumulating ecotype (NHE) of Sedum alfredii Hance belong to the same species but exhibit contrasting characteristics regarding hyperaccumulation and hypertolerance to cadmium and zinc. The Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform was employed to sequence HE and NHE to study the genetic evolution of this contrasting trait. Greater than 90 million clean reads were obtained and 118,479/228,051 unigenes of HE/NHE were annotated based on seven existing databases. We identified 149,668/319,830 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 12,691/14,428 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) of HE/NHE. We used a branch-site model to identify 18 divergent orthologous genes and 57 conserved orthologous genes of S. alfredii Hance. The divergent orthologous genes were mainly involved in the transcription and translation processes, protein metabolism process, calcium (Ca2+) pathway, stress response process and signal transduction process. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use RNA-seq to compare the genetic evolution of hyperaccumulating and non-hyperaccumulating plants from the same species. In addition, this study made the sole concrete for further studies on molecular markers and divergent orthologous genes to depict the evolution process and formation of the hyperaccumulation and hypertolerance traits in S. alfredii Hance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SNPs; SSRs; Sedum alfredii Hance; cadmium; comparative transcriptome; divergent orthologous genes; hyperaccumulator; zinc

Year:  2017        PMID: 28439276      PMCID: PMC5383727          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


Introduction

Given long-term evolution and natural selection, a few plants growing in mining soils for a long period of time exhibit strong tolerance and hyperaccumulation of heavy metals within a translocation factor >1. These plants are called hyperaccumulator plants (Baker and Brooks, 1989). Hyperaccumulator plants are ideal candidates for studying heavy metal accumulation mechanisms and remediation of heavy metals/metalloids from contaminated soils (Reeves and Baker, 2000). Sedum alfredii Hance is a zinc (Zn)/cadmium (Cd) co-hyperaccumulator. The shoot Zn concentration of S. alfredii Hance reaches 19,670 mg/kg, and the shoot Cd concentration reaches 9,000 mg/kg (Yang et al., 2002, 2004). However, another ecotype of S. alfredii is not tolerant to heavy metal, with shoot Zn concentrations of only 490 mg/kg and leaf Cd concentrations of 533 mg/kg (Ni et al., 2004; Xiong et al., 2004). The difference in heavy metal accumulation ability between the two ecotypes may be attributed to different heavy metal concentrations in the growing environment. Given the strong selective pressure of heavy metal stress and the dominant character of tolerance to heavy metal stress, the selection of tolerance traits between the same species in different growth conditions have become much faster than usual, leading to different tolerance and accumulation of heavy metals (Lefèbvra and Vernet, 1990). The Hyperaccumulating ecotype of S. alfredii Hance (HE) was found in an old mining region in Quzhou, Zhejiang Province, China (118°56′ E, 29°17′ N) (Yang et al., 2001, 2002, 2004), which was first mined between the late Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty (approximately 300 years ago). The identification of plant species was confirmed according to the Arboretum of Zhejiang Province, China (Yang et al., 2002). HE is a new variety of S. alfredii Hance given the long-term evolution and natural selection of heavy metals, and it is the nearest relative to the non-hyperaccumulating S. alfredii Hance ecotype (NHE) found in the suburb of Hangzhou City (30°06′N, 120°12′E), Zhejiang province. However, genomic variation of the two ecotypes is notable (Chao et al., 2008). Hence, studying the genetic variation between HE and NHE can help understand key processes of heavy metal accumulation and provide a valuable model to investigate the micro-evolution. To date, only a few researches have been conducted on the genetic variation of hyperaccumulators, especially S. alfredii Hance. The Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) method was used to compared the genomic variation of HE, NHE and other four species of Sedum and found that HE had ten RAPD bands related to SH containing compounds and resisting osmotic stress (Chao et al., 2008). Up to 2008, eight polymorphic microsatellite markers were developed in HE and NHE, and the average allele number was 5.25 per locus (Huang et al., 2008). However, the information of the evolution of S. alfredii Hance is still limited. Arabidopsis halleri and Noccaea caerulescens are also Zn/Cd co-hyperaccumulator plants. A cross between A. halleri and a non-hyperaccumulating, non-tolerant species A. petraea was made, and their hyperaccumulation and tolerance characteristics were independent (Macnair et al., 1999). Three quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were identified, representing colocalization with HMA4 (Heavy Metal ATPase4), MTP1-A (Metal Tolerance Protein1-A), and MTP1-B (Metal Tolerance Protein1-B) (Willems et al., 2007). The cis-regulatory changes and triplication of AhHMA4 during evolution were the key factors for metal hyperaccumulation of A. halleri (Hanikenne et al., 2008). Five MTP1 paralogues were present in A. halleri, AhMTP1-A1, -A2, -B, -C, and -D that were the basis of Zn transport and tolerance, but their evolutionary fates were different (Shahzad et al., 2010). The results of the cross between different ecotypes of N. caerulescens demonstrated that two QTLs are related to root Zn accumulation (Assuncao et al., 2006), explaining 21.7 and 16.6% of the phenotype variation (Deniau et al., 2006). In addition, three QTLs for Zn and one QTL for Cd accumulation in shoots were also identified. However, in S. alfredii Hance, the reproductive organ, stamen and pistil are fused together, making them difficult to emasculate during crossing for QTL analysis. Nevertheless, RNA sequencing is considerably easier and less time consuming; only requiring RNA extraction from tissues. Comparative transcriptome analysis is a new method to investigate genotypic variation. Using transcript data, we can detect the Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) molecular marker, which is a convenient tool to study the plant evolution and depict the gene map (Blanca et al., 2011). In addition, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci and orthologous genes, which can reveal the variance between genotypes, can also be obtained from transcriptome sequences (Novaes et al., 2008; Blanca et al., 2011). For hyperaccumulator plants, no research is available using a comparative transcriptome to study its genetic evolution. Hence, our research will be the first study to provide ample information of evolution key factors and lay the foundation to study its evolution processes further. In this study, we will employ the comparative transcriptome sequencing method to study the genetic variation of HE and NHE by analysing their SSRs, SNPs and orthologous genes.

Materials and methods

Plant growth and treatment

HE was obtained from an old Pb/Zn mining region of Quzhou city in Zhejiang province, and NHE was obtained from a tea plantation of Hangzhou in Zhejiang province. HE plants were grown in non-polluted soils for several generations to reduce the internal metal concentration. We cut the shoots, removed some leaves and cultured them hydroponically. HE and NHE were supplied with basal nutrient solution (Zhang et al., 2016) with or without 100 μM ZnSO4, 500 μM ZnSO4, or 50 μM CdCl2 for 7 days. The pH of the nutrient solution was adjusted to 5.8 every other day. The nutrient solution was continuously aerated and renewed every 3 days. The plants were grown in a growth chamber with a 16/8-h photoperiod at 400 μM m−2 s−1, day/night temperatures of 26°/20°C, and humidity of 70/85%. Three biological replicates were performed for each treatment. The upper shoots and new roots were harvested separately for transcriptome analysis and placed in liquid nitrogen immediately.

Libraries establishment, illumina sequencing, de novo assembly and annotation

Total RNA was extracted from HE and NHE shoots and roots with RNAout kit (Tiangen, China). First, we assessed the degradation and contamination of RNA on 1% agarose gels. The purity of RNA was assessed using the NanoPhotometer® (IMPLEN, CA, USA), and the concentration of RNA was measured using Qubit® RNA Assay Kit in Qubit® 2.0 Flurometer (Life Technologies, CA, USA). RNA integrity was assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Agilent Bio-analyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). A total amount of 1.5 μg of qualified RNA per sample was used to establish the HE and NHE libraries, separately. Sequencing libraries were generated using the NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA). Briefly, mRNA was purified using magnetic beads and divalent cations under elevated temperature. First strand cDNA was synthesized using random hexamer primers and RNase H. Second strand cDNA synthesis was performed using DNA polymerase I and RNase H. The library fragments were purified with AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, USA) to select cDNA 150–200 bp in length. Library quality was assessed on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). HE and NHE library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform and 125-bp paired-end reads were generated. First, raw data in the fastq format were processed, and clean data were obtained using Trimmomatic (Lohse et al., 2012) by removing reads containing adapter, reads containing ploy-N and low quality reads from raw data. All the downstream analyses were based on clean data with high quality. HE and NHE sequences were assembled separately. Transcriptome assembly was accomplished based on the left files and the right files using Trinity (Grabherr et al., 2011) with min_kmer_cov set to 2 by default, and all other parameters were set to default. The longest transcripts of each gene were chosen as unigenes. The length of transcripts and unigenes were calculated. The unigenes were annotated based on the following seven databases: Nr (NCBI non-redundant protein sequences), Nt (NCBI non-redundant nucleotide sequences), Pfam (Protein family), KOG (eukaryotic Ortholog Groups), Swiss-Prot (A manually annotated and reviewed protein sequence database), KO (KEGG Ortholog database) and GO (Gene Ontology). The e-values cut-off of NR, NT and Swiss-Prot were 1e-5, and the e-value cut-off of KOG was 1e-3 using NCBI blast 2.2.28+. The e-values cut-off of KEGG, Pfam and GO were 1e-10, 0.01 and 1e-6, using KAAS, hmmscan and blast2go, respectively. According to the GO annotation, the unigenes of each ecotype were classified into biological process, cell component and molecular function. Based on the KOG annotation, the unigenes of HE and NHE were classified into 26 groups, respectively. The number of unigenes of HE and NHE under the second level of KEGG ortholog were calculated. The CDS detection followed the following two steps: (i) The unigenes were blast against the Nr and Swiss-port databases, and an open-reading frame (ORF) was extracted and translated into a peptide sequence; (ii) The unigenes without align results or hits against the not-predicted sequences would be predicted the ORF and translated into peptide sequence with the standard codon table using ESTSCAN software (3.0.3).

SNPs calling and SSRs detection

Picard - tools v1.41 and samtools v0.1.18 were used to establish the index of referenced transcriptome assembly sequence. The clean reads of each sample obtained from HE or NHE were mapped to transcriptome assembly sequence of HE or NHE to generate the bam files. The ReorderSam.Jar tool implemented in Picard—tools was used for hierarchical ranking for bam files. SortSam.Jar implemented in Picar—tool was used to sort and AddOrReplaceReadGroups. Jar was used to add identified information to bam file to fulfil1 the file format for GATK variation detection. SNP calling was performed by GATK2 (McKenna et al., 2010) software. Raw vcf files were filtered with the GATK standard filter method and other parameters (clusterWindowSize: 10; MQ0 ≥ 4 and (MQ0/ (1.0*DP)) > 0.1; QUAL < 10; QUAL < 30.0 or QD < 5.0 or HRun > 5), and only SNPs with quality > 30 and distance > 5 were retained. SSRs of the transcriptome were identified using MISA (http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/misa.html) with the default parameters, and the minimum repeats of mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide motifs were 10, 6, 5, 5, 5, and 5, respectively. The distribution densities of different SSRs types in transcriptome were calculated.

Identification of orthologous genes

The CDSs of each unigene were extracted and translated into amino acid sequences. Blast-based approach performs all-to-all BLAST before ortholog classification. All-to-all BLASTP was conducted for all amino acid sequences with a cut-off e-value of 1e−5. Orthologous groups were constructed from the BLASTP results using OrthoMCL v2.0.3 (Li et al., 2003) with default settings. The CDS of Vitis vinifera was used as an internal reference, and the CDS of A. thaliana was used as an external reference. The orthologous groups sequences were one-to-one blasted against the CDS of V. vinifera and A. thaliana using Muscle 3.8.31. The Ka/Ks ratios, which indicate the ratios of non-synonymous rate (Ka) to synonymous rate (Ks), were calculated by PAML (Yang, 2007). The non-synonymous rate indicates the number of non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site. The synonymous rate indicates the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous sites. Synonymous refers to the nucleotide substitutions that do not change the encoded amino acid, and non-synonymous refers to the nucleotide substitutions that change the amino acid. We used a branch-site model (model = 2, Nsites = 2) in the codeml program in the PAML package to detect the signatures of selection on individual codons in a specific branch (Zhang et al., 2005). The HE branches were set as the foreground branch, and the optimized branch-site model was used. A likelihood ratio test (LRT) compared a model with positive or purified selection on the foreground branch with a null model in which no significant selection occurred on the foreground branch and calculated the statistic to obtain a P-value. With P-values less than 0.05, the genes with Ka/Ks > 1 were identified as divergent orthologous genes, which evolve under positive selection. Genes with Ka/Ks < 0.1 were identified as conserved orthologous genes that were purified under heavy selection constraint likely due to a conserved function. The orthologous genes with 0.1 < Ka/Ks < 1 were identified as neutral orthologous genes. The analysis logic flow is presented in Figure S1 online.

KEGG pathway enrichment of orthologous genes

The divergent and conserved orthologous genes were annotated based on seven databases. KOBAS (Mao et al., 2005) software was used to test the statistical enrichment of divergent and conserved genes ortholog groups in KEGG pathways. The P-values in the significance tests (corrected P-value < 0.05) were corrected via false discovery rate (FDR).

Sequencing confirmation

To confirm the accuracy of the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform sequence and Trinity assembly, we randomly chose 15 divergent orthologous genes from both HE and NHE, and resequenced these genes using Sanger sequencing. The primers were designed using Primer 3 (Koressaar and Remm, 2007). We used 55°C as the annealing temperature, and sequencing was conducted with an ABI BigDye® Terminator kit on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer. Primer information is presented in Table S1.

Heavy metal analysis

The remaining shoots and roots were used to determine Zn and Cd concentration by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) (Agilent, USA). We used GBW10014 (GSB-5) CRM Cabbage as an internal reference. The Zn concentration detected in CRM Cabbage was 27.23 mg/kg, which was in the range of the standard value of 26 ± 2 mg/kg, and the Cd concentration detected in CRM Cabbage was 31 μg/kg, which was in the range of the standard value of 35 ± 6 μg/kg. The heavy metal concentration was statistically analyzed using student's t-test and ANOVA.

Results

Transcriptome sequence and assembly

The morphological phenotypes of HE and NHE are comparable on normal growth conditions (Figure 1A). When supplied with 100 μM Zn or 50 μM Cd, the HE plants did not exhibit any toxicity symptoms with green leaves and white roots. However, the NHE plants exhibited severely toxic symptoms with stale leaves and brown roots. HE accumulated greater than 20,000 mg/kg Zn in shoots when supplied with 100 μM Zn for 7 days, and its shoots also accumulated more than 3,500 mg/kg Cd when supplied with 50 μM Cd. However, NHE accumulated only 1,422 mg/kg Zn or 857 mg/kg Cd in shoots when supplied with 100 μM Zn or 50 μM Cd. In addition, Zn was mainly stored in roots of NHE, whereas HE, Zn and Cd are mainly transported to shoots (Figures 1B,C).
Figure 1

The phenotypes of hyperaccumulating ecotype (HE) (left) and non-hyperaccumulating ecotype (NHE) (right) of and Zn concentration (B) and Cd concentration (C) of Sedum alfredii Hance. Control treatment was only nutrient solution. Zn treatment was 100 μM ZnSO4 and Cd treatment was 50 μM CdCl2.

The phenotypes of hyperaccumulating ecotype (HE) (left) and non-hyperaccumulating ecotype (NHE) (right) of and Zn concentration (B) and Cd concentration (C) of Sedum alfredii Hance. Control treatment was only nutrient solution. Zn treatment was 100 μM ZnSO4 and Cd treatment was 50 μM CdCl2. To obtain sequences of a large number of expressed genes, we used the RNA of shoots and roots of HE and NHE plants supplied with 0 μM, 100 μM Zn, 500 μM Zn, and 50 μM Cd for sequencing on the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform. We obtained 94,134,864 and 103,397,468 raw reads of HE and NHE, respectively (Table 1). After cleaning the raw reads with adaptor related, with containing poly-N and low quality, we obtained 92,371,082 clean reads in total for both ends with 125 bp of HE, which was equal to 11.54 G. We obtained 101,217,674 clean reads for each end with 125 bp of NHE, which was equal to 12.66 G (Table 1). After assembling the clean reads of HE and NHE separately, 157,226 transcripts with a mean length of 846 bp of HE and 269,592 transcripts with a mean length of 658 bp of NHE were obtained (see Table 1 and Figure S2 online). We chose the longest transcript of each gene as the unigene. In total, we acquired 118,479 unigenes with a mean length of 609 bp for HE and 228,051 unigenes with a mean length of 518 bp for NHE (Table 1). Ranking the transcripts from long to short and summing the length of the transcripts, the contig N50 is the length of the smallest contig in the set that contains the fewest (largest) contigs whose combined length represents at least 50% of the assembly, while the N90 is the length of the smallest contig in the set that contains the fewest (largest) contigs whose combined length represents at least 90% of the assembly (Miller et al., 2010). The N50 and N90 values of unigenes of HE were 1,009 and 244, respectively, whereas the N50 and N90 values of unigenes of NHE were 656 and 235, respectively (Table 1). The length distribution of transcripts and unigenes indicated that the <301 size class constituted most transcripts and unigenes, and the number of transcripts and unigenes decreased as length size increased (see Figure S2 online). All raw data and clean data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive repository (Accession Number: SRR5061928 for HE S. alfredii Hance and SRR5082565 for NHE S. alfredii Hance).
Table 1

Basic information of raw reads, clean reads, assembled unigenes, annotation, CDS, SNP, and SSR loci.

SpeciesNo. of raw readsNo. of clean readsNo. of unigenesN50/N90 value of unigenes (mean length)Annotation (percentage)CDSSNPSSR
HE94,134,86492,371,082118,4791,009/244 (609)73,617 (62.13%)109,685149,66812,691
NHE103,397,468101,217,674228,051656/235 (518)149,378 (65.5%)214,358319,83014,428

HE, Hyperaccumulating ecotype; and NHE, non-hyperaccumulating ecotype of Sedum alfredii Hance.

Basic information of raw reads, clean reads, assembled unigenes, annotation, CDS, SNP, and SSR loci. HE, Hyperaccumulating ecotype; and NHE, non-hyperaccumulating ecotype of Sedum alfredii Hance. To confirm the accuracy of the Illumina sequences and Trinity assembly, we used Sanger sequencing to re-sequence divergent orthologous genes, including six HE fragments and nine NHE fragments. For HE, the total length was 2,409 bp, and only three sites were different, indicating that the consistency rate was 99.9%. For NHE, the total length was 3,928 bp, and the consistency rate was 99.7% within 12 different sites (see Table S1 online). The high consistency rates of HE and NHE confirmed the accuracy of Illumina sequence and Trinity assembly.

Unigenes of HE and NHE annotation

A total of 73,617 (62.13%) unigenes of HE and 149,378 (65.5%) unigenes of NHE were successfully annotated in at least one of the seven databases: Nr, Nt, Pfam, KOG, Swiss-Prot, KO and GO (Table 1, Table S2). The highest annotation rate of the database was Nr, in which 52.61% of unigenes of HE and 55.66% of unigenes of NHE were annotated. We extracted 109,685 coding region sequences (CDS) of HE and 214,358 CDS of NHE from blast or ESTSCAN results (Table 1). The major KOG group of HE was group (J): translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (20.1%) (Figure 2A); the major KOG group for NHE was group (O): posttranslational modification, protein turnover and chaperones (15.2%) (Figure 2B). The percentages of other groups for HE and NHE were similar. A total of 54,994 unigenes of HE and 104,365 unigenes of NHE were annotated in GO (see Table S2 online). GO is classified into three ontologies, including biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. HE and NHE represented the same patterns of GO annotation. The major biological process terms were the cellular process, metabolic process and single-organism process. The major cellular component terms included the cell, cell part, macromolecular complex and organelle. The major molecular function terms were binding and catalytic activity (see Figure S3 online). There were 28,150 unigenes of HE and 48,697 unigenes of NHE annotated in KEGG ortholog (see Table S2 online). The major KO group for both HE and NHE was translation, and the second major KO group was signal transduction (see Figure S4 online). The results of KOG annotation and KEGG ortholog annotation suggested that expression regulation plays a significant role in hyperaccumulation traits of S. alfredii.
Figure 2

Unigenes annotation based on eukaryotic Ortholog Groups (KOG) of hyperaccumulating ecotype (HE) (A) and non-hyperaccumulating ecotype (NHE) (B) of Sedum alfredii Hance.

Unigenes annotation based on eukaryotic Ortholog Groups (KOG) of hyperaccumulating ecotype (HE) (A) and non-hyperaccumulating ecotype (NHE) (B) of Sedum alfredii Hance.

SNPs and SSRs analysis

We identified 149,668 SNPs loci of HE and 319,830 SNPs loci of NHE (Table 1). Among them, A/G was the most frequent SNP type, occupying 30.2 and 30.9% of HE and NHE, respectively, whereas C/T was the second most frequent SNP type, occupying 29.3 and 30.4% of SNP types of HE and NHE, respectively (see Table S3 online). The percentages of non-coding regions SNPs sites of HE and NHE were 63.17 and 53.36%, respectively (see Table S4 online). The percentages of non-synonymous SNPs were 0.11 and 0.09% for HE and NHE, respectively (see Table S4 online), indicating that the functional mutation rate was very low. The detailed SNPs information for HE and NHE were available from Datasheets S1, S2. We identified 12,691 SSRs of HE and 14,428 SSRs of NHE (Table 1). For HE, 10,746 unigenes contained SSRs, and 1,579 unigenes contained more than one SSR. A total of 5.0% SSRs were characterized as compound forms. Among the SSRs, the most abundant repeat unit type was monomers (39.7%), followed by trimers (38.4%), dimers (20.0%), tetramers, hexamers and pentamers (see Table S5 online). For NHE, the assay revealed that 12,393 unigenes contained SSRs, and 1,653 unigenes contained more than one SSRs. In total, 5.3% SSRs were characterized as compound forms. Among the SSRs, the most abundant repeat unit type was trimers (43.4%), followed by monomers (34.0%), dimers (19.6%), tetramers, hexamers and pentamers (see Table S4 online). Both for HE and NHE, the most abundant repeat type of monomers were 9–12 repeats, and the other most abundant repeat type of other motifs were 5–8 repeats (see Figure S5 online). The detailed repeat type frequency for HE and NHE were available from Datasheet S3.

Orthologous genes analysis

After using the branch-site model and likelihood ratio test, 18 divergent orthologous genes, 57 conserved orthologous genes and 331 none (neutral) orthologous genes were identified (Figure 3). The annotation results of divergent orthologous genes indicated that there were two 28S ribosomal RNA genes, two calmodulins, two histidine kinases, two nuclear transcription factor Y genes, and two WRKY transcription factors, and the other orthologous genes were apolipoprotein, calcipressin, cysteine proteinase inhibitor, F-actin capping protein, proteasome, receptor-like protein kinase, RNA polymerase C-terminal repeat and vacuolar-sorting receptor (Table 2). KEGG pathway enrichment indicated that only three genes were significantly enriched in the KEGG pathway, including plant-pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction and mRNA surveillance pathway (Figure 4), implying that these pathways may evolve under heavy metal stress.
Figure 3

Distribution of Ka and Ks. Ka/Ks>1 as divergent ortholog gene, Ka/Ks<1 as conserved ortholog gene and 0.1

Table 2

Information and annotation of divergent orthologous genes.

OG IDContig IDContig IDKaKsKa/Ksp-valueFunctional annotation
OG30580HE|c48427_g1NHE|c76500_g60.17150.13581.26340.010034RNA polymeraseII Rpb1 C-terminal repeat
OG30137HE|c44762_g1NHE|c66407_g10.04850.02851.70550.00295728S ribosomal RNA gene
OG11524HE|c41849_g1NHE|c75692_g10.0260.02011.29220.02393728S ribosomal RNA gene
OG30653HE|c4929_g1NHE|c62840_g10.09010.02134.23220.007088Proteasome
OG29785HE|c42238_g2NHE|c75239_g20.07040.0312.27560.006675Cysteine proteinase inhibitor
OG34157HE|c87800_g1NHE|c56126_g10.03780.03291.14845.73E-05Calmodulin
OG27602HE|c24377_g1NHE|c218476_g10.36490.32681.11660.005169Calmodulin
OG26704HE|c12628_g1NHE|c149750_g10.17850.05573.20280.003417Calcipressin
OG27764HE|c26038_g1NHE|c62425_g10.57890.33651.72020.029386Nuclear transcription factor Y
OG30430HE|c47086_g2NHE|c56724_g10.05360.04761.12680.024629Nuclear transcription factor Y
OG31192HE|c54459_g1NHE|c6500_g10.54250.1274.27028.39E-07WRKY transcription factor
OG04684HE|c107180_g1NHE|c62757_g10.02230.01591.40350.010898WRKY transcription factor
OG30906HE|c51477_g2NHE|c74553_g10.0830.03282.52940.003113Apolipoprotein
OG31045HE|c52729_g3NHE|c53528_g10.05630.02262.49650.000715Histidine kinase
OG27948HE|c28007_g1NHE|c69277_g10.0420.01922.18280.003796Histidine kinase
OG33400HE|c78721_g1NHE|c69638_g10.06290.041.5710.001293Receptor-like protein kinase
OG23769HE|c40589_g1NHE|c65962_g10.07140.02542.80660.016308F-actin capping protein
OG31469HE|c56909_g1NHE|c61038_g10.02710.00912.98020.005782Vacuolar-sorting receptor

HE, Hyperaccumulating ecotype; and NHE, non-hyperaccumulating ecotype of Sedum alfredii Hance.

Figure 4

Unigenes Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) of divergent orthologous genes.

Distribution of Ka and Ks. Ka/Ks>1 as divergent ortholog gene, Ka/Ks<1 as conserved ortholog gene and 0.1Ks<1 as noneortholog gene. Information and annotation of divergent orthologous genes. HE, Hyperaccumulating ecotype; and NHE, non-hyperaccumulating ecotype of Sedum alfredii Hance. Unigenes Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) of divergent orthologous genes. In total, 13 (22.8% of all conserved orthologous genes) conserved orthologous genes were annotated as ribosomal proteins, including four 40S ribosomal proteins, one 50S ribosomal protein and eight 60S ribosomal proteins (see Table S6 online). There were no conserved orthologous genes statistically significantly enriched in KEGG pathway, but relative enrichment terms were ribosome, cell processes including protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum, phagosome, and endocytosis. The conserved orthologous genes were also relatively enriched in some primary metabolic pathway, such as glutamate metabolism, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, nitrogen metabolism fructose and mannose metabolism and citrate cycle (TCA cycle) (see Figure S6 online), indicating that ribosomes and primary metabolic pathways were conserved through genetic evolution.

Discussion

HE plants grow in an old Zn/Pb mining region, whereas NHE plants grow in a tea plantation in Hangzhou. Both HE and NHE belong to the same species but have contrasting abilities to accumulate and tolerate Cd, Zn and Pb based on their different growing environments. The occurrence of different adaptation abilities to heavy metals in 65 populations of A. halleri in Europe was also attributed to geographical isolation (Pauwels et al., 2012). Hence, the environmental pressures of the Zn/Pb mining region forced the HE ecotype to evolve characteristics from NHE to adapt to heavy metal stress. In this study, we provided genetic information for both HE and NHE and revealed the variation between them, which can compensate for the gap of knowledge in molecular markers (SSRs and SNPs) and orthologous genes of S. alfredii Hance. For GO annotation, the metabolic process, regulation of biological process and response to stimulus of biological process were enriched, which was consistent with the previous results of S. alfredii shoot Cd transcriptome analysis (Gao et al., 2013). In addition, the extracellular region and membrane of cellular component items, catalytic activity, structural molecular activity and transporter activity of molecular function were also enriched, which was similar with the GO enrichment results of a previous study (Gao et al., 2013), suggesting that the Cd accumulation ability of HE may be related to the genetic evolution of HE. The zinc transcriptome of hyperaccumulator Populus × euramericana leaves also revealed that the structural molecule activity, receptor activity, transporter activity and enzyme regulator activity were enriched in GO (Di Baccio et al., 2011), which was similar to our results. In addition, antioxidant activity was enriched for S. alfredii and N. caerulescens (Halimaa et al., 2014), suggesting that the genes in these GO categories may play roles in hyperaccumulation or hypertolerance to heavy metals. A large amount of SSR and SNP markers boosted population transcriptome approaches to characterize the evolution process and provide signatures of selection (Stinchcombe and Hoekstra, 2008; Siol et al., 2010). Nevertheless, no SNP resources have been previously reported for S. alfredii. Here, we reported 149,668 SNPs for HE and 319,830 SNPs for NHE (Table 1), providing novel genomic markers to characterize the polymorphism diversity of S. alfredii. In a previous study, eight genomic SSRs were identified as polymorphic between HE and NHE leaves (Huang et al., 2008), and 6,176 perfect SSRs and 3,019 imperfect SSRs were also found in HE shoots (Gao et al., 2013). In this study, we identified 12,691 SSRs for HE and 14,428 SSRs for NHE from both shoots and roots (Table 1), providing more complete microsatellite information for further molecular population genetic studies. To determine how HE S. alfredii Hance adapt to environments with heavy metal stress is important for research in the evolutionary biology of hyperaccumulators. The ratio of Ka and Ks has been widely used for the deduction of evolutionary dynamics and indication of adaptive symbols of protein-coding sequences (Yang and Bielawski, 2000). The orthologous genes with a Ka/Ks ratio greater than 1 were highly diverged under the natural selection pressure. Given that we combined all the RNA samples together to establish libraries and did the analysis, we did not examine the orthologous gene expression level. In the present study, we identified 18 divergent orthologous genes between HE and NHE. We classified them into five groups: transcription and translation processes, protein metabolism process, calcium (Ca2+) pathway, stress response process and signal transduction process (Table 2). The RNA polymerase II Rbpl C-terminal repeat (OG30580) and 28S ribosomal RNA gene (OG30137 and OG11524) were related to transcription and translation processes. RNA polymerase II transcribes all protein-encoding genes into mRNA, non-coding RNAs, small nucleolar RNAs and microRNAs (Cramer et al., 2008). Its largest subunit Rpb1 evolved a repetitive carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) (Egloff and Murphy, 2008), of which phosphorylation status determine the activities of RNA polymerase II complex and associated proteins (Hajheidari et al., 2013). The CTD phosphatases are involved in ABA signaling, normal growth and development (Bang et al., 2006) and xenobiotic detoxification pathways in plants (Fukudome et al., 2014). The 28S ribosomal RNA gene is part of the rRNA transcriptional unit (Long and Dawid, 1980), and its divergent regions known as “D”-regions are typically used as a phylogenetic marker for analysing evolution (Gou et al., 2013). The genes involved in transcription and translation processes diverging under evolution suggested that S. alfredii evolved variations in fundamental biological processes under heavy metal stress. Proteasome (OG30653) and cysteine proteinase inhibitor (OG29785) belonged to protein metabolism process. When plants suffer from heavy metal stress, such as from Cd, arsenic (As) and chromium (Cr), damaged proteins resulting from oxidative stress are produced. The ubiquitin/proteasome 26S system is subsequently activated to degrade and remove the damaged proteins (Dametto et al., 2015). Cysteine proteases will lead to inappropriate proteolysis in high concentrations, so cysteine protease inhibitors are needed to correctly and appropriately regulate enzymatic activity (Bobek and Levine, 1992). Previous studies demonstrated that cysteine proteinase inhibitors increase tolerance to salt, drought, oxidation, and cold in plants (Zhang et al., 2008; Li et al., 2015). Cysteine proteinase inhibitors also interact with a calcium/calmodulin-binding receptor-like kinase or a Ca2+-dependent nuclease to regulate plant alkaline stress tolerance (Sun et al., 2014). In our study, calmodulin (OG34157 and OG27602) and calcipressin (OG26704) were divergent orthologous genes. In addition, whether cysteine proteinase inhibitors also interact with proteins regulated by calcipressin or calmodulin to form hypertolerance mechanisms responding to heavy metal stress should also be assessed. Calmodulin senses the intracellular Ca2+ concentration and regulates a highly conserved type 2B protein phosphatase, calcineurin, which is vital for mediating cellular stress responses (Aramburu et al., 2004). Calcineurin activity is also regulated by calcipressins positively or negatively (Davies et al., 2007). In our previous study, we demonstrated that exogenous Ca2+ inhibited Cd influx into roots (Lu et al., 2010) and significantly increased glutathione biosynthesis to alleviate growth inhibition from Cd stress (Tian et al., 2011b) in S. alfredii Hance. The distribution pattern of Cd is similar to Ca in the leaves of HE but not in NHE, suggesting that the Ca pathway may be associated with Cd detoxification (Tian et al., 2011a) and Cd2+ may compete with Ca2+ for calmodulin binding (Rivetta et al., 1997). Nuclear transcription factor Y (NF-Y) (OG27764 and OG30430), WRKY transcription factor (OG31192 and OG04684) and apolipoprotein (OG30906) belong to the stress response process. NF-Y binding to the CCAAT box is ubiquitous in plants and is emerging as a significant regulator of the stress-induce response (Leyva-Gonzalez et al., 2012). NF-Ys are highly induced in response to low phosphorus, low nitrogen, high salinity, oxidative, heat and drought stress (Li et al., 2008; Hackenberg et al., 2012; Leyva-Gonzalez et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2014). WRKY transcription factors recognize the W-box of target genes and induced their expression to mediate abiotic stress (Phukan et al., 2016). Previous studies demonstrated that WRKYs were up-regulated under Cd stress in A. thaliana, N. caerulescens, Tamarixhispida, and Populussimonii × Populusnigra (Wei et al., 2008; Opdenakker et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). It was found that WRKY transcription factors are also modulated in response to Pi homeostasis, iron starvation, and cold stress in rice (Dai et al., 2016). Apolipoprotein is involved in modulating tolerance to oxidative stress, freezing, heat shock, and paraquat treatment (Charron et al., 2002, 2008). The significant divergence of these transcription factors may be involved in the heavy metal stress response in S. alfredii Hance. We classified histidine kinase (OG31045 and OG27048) and receptor-like protein kinase (OG33400) into the signal transduction process group. Histidine kinase (HK) operates through the cytokinin signal transduction pathway and controls numerous physiological processes in plants (Narusaka et al., 2004). Recently, AHK5 was reported to play roles in maintaining the H2O2 homeostasis, perceiving nitric oxide and ethylene signals (Desikan et al., 2008). In addition, numerous histidine kinases are involved in drought, salt, cold, and osmotic stress responses (Urao et al., 1999; Tran et al., 2007; Jeon et al., 2010; Pham et al., 2012). Receptor-like protein kinase forms the largest group of eLRR-containing cell surface receptors (Shiu and Bleecker, 2003), which perceive extracellular signals at the plasma membrane (Walker and Zhang, 1990) and play roles in abscisic acid signaling, disease resistance and fungal pathogens resistance (Komjanc et al., 1999; Fritz-Laylin et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2008; Cova et al., 2010). The divergence of signal perception genes suggested that HE may evolve a more sensible signal perception system in response to heavy metal influx into roots. Further studies on relative expression levels of signal transduction genes and protein-protein interaction assay by yeast two-hybrid analysis and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay will verify this hypothesis.

Conclusion

Altogether, this study was the first to use comparative RNA-sequencing technology to depict the evolution variation of hyperaccumulator plants. We obtained large amounts of sequence information from shoots and roots of HE and NHE. We identified molecular markers, such as SNPs and SSRs of S. alfredii Hance, which are an important resource for research in hyperaccumulation and hypertolerance traits in genome mapping. The 18 divergent orthologous genes were mainly involved in transcription and translation processes, protein metabolism process, Ca2+ signaling pathway, stress response process and signal transduction process, which are key factors for HE in adaptive evolution to heavy metal-contaminated environments. In general, our results may lay a solid foundation for research into molecular systematic, population genetic and evolution processes of S. alfredii Hance.

Author contributions

XY, QY, and MS designed the experiment. QY and MS performed the experiment. QY analyzed the data of the work. QY wrote the manuscript. ZH, YF, and MS revised the manuscript. All authors approved the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring accuracy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  66 in total

1.  Zinc tolerance and hyperaccumulation are genetically independent characters.

Authors:  M R Macnair; V Bert; S B Huitson; P Saumitou-Laprade; D Petit
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.

Authors:  Jianzhi Zhang; Rasmus Nielsen; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 3.  Combining population genomics and quantitative genetics: finding the genes underlying ecologically important traits.

Authors:  J R Stinchcombe; H E Hoekstra
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Cracking the RNA polymerase II CTD code.

Authors:  Sylvain Egloff; Shona Murphy
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Transcriptome analyses of Populus x euramericana clone I-214 leaves exposed to excess zinc.

Authors:  Daniela Di Baccio; Giulio Galla; Tania Bracci; Andrea Andreucci; Gianni Barcaccia; Roberto Tognetti; Luca Sebastiani
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.196

6.  Arabidopsis histidine kinase 5 regulates salt sensitivity and resistance against bacterial and fungal infection.

Authors:  Jasmine Pham; Jasmine Liu; Mark H Bennett; John W Mansfield; Radhika Desikan
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Renaming the DSCR1/Adapt78 gene family as RCAN: regulators of calcineurin.

Authors:  Kelvin J A Davies; Gennady Ermak; Beverley A Rothermel; Melanie Pritchard; Joseph Heitman; Joohong Ahnn; Flavio Henrique-Silva; Dana Crawford; Silvia Canaider; Pierluigi Strippoli; Paolo Carinci; Kyung-Tai Min; Deborah S Fox; Kyle W Cunningham; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson; Zhuohua Zhang; R Sanders Williams; Hans-Peter Gerber; Mercè Pérez-Riba; Hisao Seo; Xia Cao; Claude B Klee; Juan Miguel Redondo; Lois J Maltais; Elspeth A Bruford; Sue Povey; Jeffery D Molkentin; Frank D McKeon; Elia J Duh; Gerald R Crabtree; Martha S Cyert; Susana de la Luna; Xavier Estivill
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Homologous NF-YC2 subunit from Arabidopsis and tobacco is activated by photooxidative stress and induces flowering.

Authors:  Dieter Hackenberg; Ulrich Keetman; Bernhard Grimm
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  The plant Apolipoprotein D ortholog protects Arabidopsis against oxidative stress.

Authors:  Jean-Benoit F Charron; Francois Ouellet; Mario Houde; Fathey Sarhan
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  11 in total

1.  Exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) promotes cadmium (Cd) accumulation in Sedum alfredii Hance by regulating the expression of Cd stress response genes.

Authors:  Qinyu Lu; Shimiao Chen; Yanyan Li; Fuhai Zheng; Bing He; Minghua Gu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Transcriptome sequencing and functional analysis of Sedum lineare Thunb. upon salt stress.

Authors:  Yingjin Song; Xiaopei Yang; Shaohui Yang; Jiehua Wang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Physiological and Transcriptomic Comparison of Two Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Cultivars With High/Low Cadmium Accumulation.

Authors:  Yuanzhi Fu; Halyna Zhatova; Yuqing Li; Qiao Liu; Volodymyr Trotsenko; Chengqi Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Role of SaPCR2 in Zn Uptake in the Root Elongation Zone of the Zn/Cd Hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Jiayu Lin; Zhiying Wu; Kuan Xu; Jingyu Tao; Haizhong Lin; Shengke Tian; Lingli Lu
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23

5.  Identification and Analysis of bZIP Family Genes in Sedum plumbizincicola and Their Potential Roles in Response to Cadmium Stress.

Authors:  Zhuchou Lu; Wenmin Qiu; Kangming Jin; Miao Yu; Xiaojiao Han; Xiaoyang He; Longhua Wu; Chao Wu; Renyin Zhuo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  A Single Amino Acid Change in Nramp6 from Sedum Alfredii Hance Affects Cadmium Accumulation.

Authors:  Zhuchou Lu; Shuangshuang Chen; Xiaojiao Han; Jin Zhang; Guirong Qiao; Yugen Jiang; Renying Zhuo; Wenmin Qiu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Complex regulatory network allows Myriophyllum aquaticum to thrive under high-concentration ammonia toxicity.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Shengjun Xu; Haishu Sun; Shugeng Feng; Cancan Jiang; Sining Zhou; Shimin Wu; Guoqiang Zhuang; Baodong Chen; Zhihui Bai; Xuliang Zhuang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Zinc Hyperaccumulation in Plants: A Review.

Authors:  Habiba Balafrej; Didier Bogusz; Zine-El Abidine Triqui; Abdelkarim Guedira; Najib Bendaou; Abdelaziz Smouni; Mouna Fahr
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29

9.  Morphological and Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Three Species of Five-Needle Pines: Insights Into Phenotypic Evolution and Phylogeny.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Kewei Cai; Qiushuang Zhao; Hanxi Li; Xuelai Wang; Mulualem Tigabu; Ronald Sederoff; Wenjun Ma; Xiyang Zhao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Identification and characterization of SaeIF1 from the eukaryotic translation factor SUI1 family in cadmium hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii.

Authors:  Qi Yu; Zhong-Chun Zhang; Miao-Yu Wang; Alexander Scavo; Julian I Schroeder; Bao-Sheng Qiu
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.