| Literature DB >> 28439213 |
Tatiana Martin-Rojas1, Laura Mourino-Alvarez1, Felix Gil-Dones1, Fernando de la Cuesta1, Esther Rosello-Lleti2, Carlos M Laborde1, Miguel Rivera2, Luis Fernando Lopez-Almodovar3, Juan Antonio Lopez4, Finn Akerstrom5, Luis R Padial5, Maria G Barderas1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Calcific aortic stenosis (CAS) is the most common heart valve disease in the elderly, representing an important economic and social burden in developed countries. Currently, there is no way to predict either the onset or progression of CAS, emphasizing the need to identify useful biomarkers for this condition.Entities:
Keywords: Alpha 1 antichymotrypsin; Biomarker; Calcific aortic stenosis; Multi-proteomic
Year: 2017 PMID: 28439213 PMCID: PMC5399387 DOI: 10.1186/s12014-017-9147-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Proteomics ISSN: 1542-6416 Impact factor: 3.988
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the workflow. Samples were collected from valve replacement surgeries (AS) and autopsies (controls). During the discovery phase the whole tissue and secretome were analyzed and AACT was identified. Finally, AACT was validated as a potential biomarker in WBs, and by IHC and SRM
Clinical characteristics of AS patients
| Patient number | Age/gender | AHT | Diabetes | Dyslipidemia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74/F | Yes | No | Yes |
| 2 | 73/M | Yes | Yes | No |
| 3 | 68/M | Yes | No | Yes |
| 4 | 81/M | Yes | No | Yes |
| 5 | 69/M | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 6 | 79/F | Yes | Yes | No |
| 7 | 73/F | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 8 | 77/M | Yes | No | No |
| 9 | 79/F | Yes | Yes | No |
| 10 | 75/M | Yes | No | Yes |
| 11 | 74/M | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 12 | 74/F | Yes | Yes | No |
| 13 | 79/F | Yes | Yes | No |
| 14 | 79/F | Yes | Yes | No |
| 15 | 72/F | Yes | No | No |
| 16 | 63/M | Yes | No | Yes |
| 17 | 72//M | Yes | No | Yes |
| 18 | 75/F | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 19 | 78/M | Yes | Yes | No |
| 20 | 74/M | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mean | 74 ± 0/45% F–55% M | 100.00% | 60.00% | 50.00% |
F female, M male, AHT arterial hypertension
Clinical characteristics of control subjects
| Control number | Age/gender | Cause of the death | AHT | Diabetes | Dyslipidemia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64/M | Bronchopneumonia | No | No | No |
| 2 | 51/F | Septic shock | Yes | No | No |
| 3 | 47/H | Sepsis | No | No | No |
| 4 | 47/F | Bacterial pneumonia | No | No | No |
| 5 | 47/F | Carcinogenesis | No | No | No |
| 6 | 34/M | Acute Pancreatitis | Yes | No | No |
| 7 | 64/F | Bacterial Sepsis | No | No | No |
| 8 | 78/F | Bronchopneumonia | No | No | No |
| 9 | 42/F | Lymphoma | No | No | No |
| 10 | 67/M | Renal insufficiency | No | No | No |
| 11 | 74/M | COPD | No | No | No |
| 12 | 87/F | Carcinoma | No | No | No |
| 13 | 48/F | Pulmonary thromboembolism | No | No | No |
| 14 | 55/M | Pneumonia | No | No | No |
| 15 | 87/F | Cholelithiasis | No | No | No |
| 16 | 76/M | Carcinoma | No | No | No |
| 17 | 80/F | Atrial fibrillation | Yes | Yes | No |
| 18 | 49/F | Respiratory insufficiency | No | No | No |
| 19 | 74/M | Septic shock | Yes | No | Yes |
| 20 | 77/F | COPD | Yes | No | No |
| Mean | 69 ± 7.07/40% M–60% F | 25.00% | 5% | 5% |
F female, M male, AHT arterial hypertension, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Clinical characteristics of the subjects used in the validation phase
| Subject number | Age/gender | AHT | Diabetes | Dyslipidemia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Control | 62/M | Yes | No | Yes |
| 2 Control | 82/M | Yes | No | No |
| 3 Control | 86/M | Yes | No | Yes |
| 4 Control | 96/M | No | Yes | Yes |
| 5 Control | 78/F | Yes | Yes | No |
| 6 Control | 81/M | Yes | No | No |
| 7 Control | 40/F | No | No | No |
| 8 Control | 30/M | No | No | No |
| 9 AS | 77/F | Yes | Yes | No |
| 10 AS | 86/M | Yes | No | No |
| 11 AS | 69/F | Yes | No | No |
| 12 AS | 77/M | No | No | No |
| 13 AS | 60/F | Yes | No | No |
| 14 AS | 75/F | Yes | No | Yes |
| 15 AS | 74/M | No | No | Yes |
| 16 AS | 74/F | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mean control |
| 62.75% | 25% | 37.75% |
| Mean AS | 37.5% M | 75 | 25% | 25% |
F female, M male, AHT arterial hypertension
Fig. 22D-DIGE results. a Representative fluorescence DIGE image, showing the differentially expressed spots corresponding to AACT. On the right, the spot intensity in 3D of one of the three spots corresponding to AACT is shown. The differences between controls and patients were consistent in the 8 gels studied. b Fragmentation spectra of the proteotypic peptides used for AACT identification by MALDI-MS/MS. The fragments of the y ion series are shown in blue, while the b ion series are shown in red
List of the alpha 1 antichymotrypsin isoforms identified in the 2D-DIGE analysis of AS patients versus controls
| Protein name | Accesion number | MASCOT score | Seq coverage | Match peptides | Expect score | Ratio CAS/C | Theo. pI | Theo. MW | Exp. pI | Exp. MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha-1-antichymotrypsin | P01011 | 394 | 23 | 13 | 1.6e−034 | 1.96 | 5.33 | 47.62 | 4.7 | 95 |
| 174 | 37 | 16 | 1.6e−012 | 1.94 | 5.33 | 47.62 | 4.65 | 104 | ||
| 77 | 23 | 7 | 0.0074 | 2.00 | 5.33 | 47.62 | 4.6 | 105 |
The Uniprot accession number is shown, along with the MASCOT score, sequence coverage, number of matched peptides, expect score, variation between the patients and the control groups (ratio AS/C), theoretical isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (MW), and experimental isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (MW) in kDa
Fig. 3Validation of the AACT protein using IHC. Stronger expression of AACT is observed in the endothelium on the aortic side and, to a greater extent in the fibrosa of the stenotic valves when compared to the controls. DAB staining is brown and is indicated by the arrows. Statistical analyses showed significant differences (*p = 0.023). Amplified images at ×100 magnification
Fig. 4Validation of the AACT protein in Western Blots. a Bidimensional immunodetection analysis of tissue samples in which differences in the expression of the isoforms is indicated by arrows. b Immunodetection of the secretome samples. The band was more intense in the patient group than in the controls. c Immunodetection of the plasma samples. Again, the band in the plasma from the patients was more intense than in the controls. Quantification by densitometry is also shown in the figure and the AACT levels are clearly higher in the CAS patients in all cases
Fig. 5SRM validation of the differences in AACT found using LC-MS/MS. a Chromatograms of secretome samples showing the transitions of the 2 proteotypic peptides: ITLLSALVETR (A.1) and LYGSEAFATDFQDSAAAK (A.2). As it is shown in the figure, the m/z values selected in the first quadrupole were 608.37 and 946.44, respectively. On the right, quantification of the three transitions (area under the curve) that were monitored for each peptide. The different m/z values selected in the third quadrupole are indicated in the figure. b Chromatograms of plasma samples showing the transitions of the proteotypic peptide AVLDVFEEGTEASAATAVK (m/z 954.48) and quantification of each transition (area under the curve) in plasma samples. The different m/z values selected in the third quadrupole are indicated in the figure
Statistical analysis of the SRM
| Peptide | T | Mean ± SEM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITLLSALVETR | T1 | Control: 22,938 ± 11,790; CAS: 418,327 ± 245,046 | 0.0032 |
| T2 | Control: 77,287 ± 41,645; CAS: 1,395,651 ± 811,858 | 0.0025 | ||
| T3 | Control: 42,469 ± 22,863; CAS: 792,453 ± 460,476 | 0.0032 | ||
| 2 | LYGSEAFATDFQDSAAAK | T1 | Control: 32,992 ± 10,156; CAS: 77,827 ± 11,396 | 0.0055 |
| T2 | Control: 42,505 ± 14,734; CAS: 97,228 ± 14,444 | 0.0095 | ||
| T3 | Control: 31,132 ± 8909; CAS: 75,803 ± 10,252 | 0.0025 | ||
| 3 | AVLDVFEEGTEASAATAVK | T1 | Control: 0.024 ± 0.001; CAS: 0.035 ± 0.006 | 0.0023 |
| T2 | Control: 0.022 ± 0.001; CAS: 0.030 ± 0.006 | 0.0325 | ||
| T3 | Control: 0.024 ± 0.001; CAS: 0.035 ± 0.006 | 0.0482 |
The peptide sequence is shown, along with the selected transitions (T) and the statistical significance (p value)