Literature DB >> 28439063

Liver Transplantation Outcomes in Recipients with High Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Scores: The Relevance of MELD Scores.

Karolina Maria Wronka1, Michał Grąt1, Jan Stypułkowski1, Emil Bik1, Maciej Krasnodębski1, Łukasz Masior1, Karolina Grąt2, Waldemar Patkowski1, Marek Krawczyk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for postoperative mortality after liver transplantation among patients with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores ≥35, with special focus on the MELD scores. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 68 primary liver transplantations in patients with MELD scores ≥35 among 1376 liver transplantations performed in the Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery (Medical University of Warsaw) between January 2002 and October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Postoperative (90-day) mortality was set as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS Postoperative mortality was 29.4% (20 of 68). The overall survival rates after 1, 5, and 10 years were 61.9%, 59.7%, and 59.7%, respectively. According to univariate analyses, MELD (p=0.014), conventional technique of liver transplantation (p=0.049), intraoperative fresh frozen plasma (p=0.040), and red blood cells (p=0.026) transfusions were risk factors for postoperative mortality. MELD score was the only independent risk factor for postoperative mortality (p=0.023) in multivariate analysis. According to receiver operating characteristics analysis, the optimal cut-off for MELD score in prediction of postoperative mortality was ≥43 (Area Under Curve=0.703, 95% Confidence Interval 0.575-0.831). Postoperative mortality was 21.4% and 42.3% among patients with MELD score <43 and ≥43, respectively (p=0.066). CONCLUSIONS MELD score is an important predictor of early mortality after liver transplantation, even among recipients with high MELD scores. In particular, patients with MELD score ≥43 should be considered as very high-risk candidates for liver transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28439063     DOI: 10.12659/aot.901045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transplant        ISSN: 1425-9524            Impact factor:   1.530


  3 in total

1.  Association between liver cirrhosis and peri-implant diseases: a case-control study on implant- and patient-related risk factors.

Authors:  Fernando Oliveira Costa; Sheila Cavalca Cortelli; José Roberto Cortelli; Eugênio José Pereira Lages; Gustavo Henrique Mattos Pereira; Adriana Moreira Costa; Luís Otávio Miranda Cota
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  "Real-time" risk models of postoperative morbidity and mortality for liver transplants.

Authors:  Shigeru Marubashi; Naoaki Ichihara; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Hiroaki Miyata; Akinobu Taketomi; Hiroto Egawa; Yasutsugu Takada; Koji Umeshita; Yasuyuki Seto; Mitsukazu Gotoh
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-11-02

3.  Placement of an Aortohepatic Conduit as an Alternative to Standard Arterial Anastomosis in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Dong-Hwan Jung; Cheon-Soo Park; Tae-Yong Ha; Gi-Won Song; Gil-Chun Park; Yong-Pil Cho; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 1.530

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.