Literature DB >> 28438661

Systematic review of the potential adverse effects of caffeine consumption in healthy adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children.

Daniele Wikoff1, Brian T Welsh2, Rayetta Henderson3, Gregory P Brorby4, Janice Britt5, Esther Myers6, Jeffrey Goldberger7, Harris R Lieberman8, Charles O'Brien9, Jennifer Peck10, Milton Tenenbein11, Connie Weaver12, Seneca Harvey13, Jonathan Urban2, Candace Doepker14.   

Abstract

To date, one of the most heavily cited assessments of caffeine safety in the peer-reviewed literature is that issued by Health Canada (Nawrot et al., 2003). Since then, >10,000 papers have been published related to caffeine, including hundreds of reviews on specific human health effects; however, to date, none have compared the wide range of topics evaluated by Nawrot et al. (2003). Thus, as an update to this foundational publication, we conducted a systematic review of data on potential adverse effects of caffeine published from 2001 to June 2015. Subject matter experts and research team participants developed five PECO (population, exposure, comparator, and outcome) questions to address five types of outcomes (acute toxicity, cardiovascular toxicity, bone and calcium effects, behavior, and development and reproduction) in four healthy populations (adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children) relative to caffeine intake doses determined not to be associated with adverse effects by Health Canada (comparators: 400 mg/day for adults [10 g for lethality], 300 mg/day for pregnant women, and 2.5 mg/kg/day for children and adolescents). The a priori search strategy identified >5000 articles that were screened, with 381 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria for the five outcomes (pharmacokinetics was addressed contextually, adding 46 more studies). Data were extracted by the research team and rated for risk of bias and indirectness (internal and external validity). Selected no- and low-effect intakes were assessed relative to the population-specific comparator. Conclusions were drawn for the body of evidence for each outcome, as well as endpoints within an outcome, using a weight of evidence approach. When the total body of evidence was evaluated and when study quality, consistency, level of adversity, and magnitude of response were considered, the evidence generally supports that consumption of up to 400 mg caffeine/day in healthy adults is not associated with overt, adverse cardiovascular effects, behavioral effects, reproductive and developmental effects, acute effects, or bone status. Evidence also supports consumption of up to 300 mg caffeine/day in healthy pregnant women as an intake that is generally not associated with adverse reproductive and developmental effects. Limited data were identified for child and adolescent populations; the available evidence suggests that 2.5 mg caffeine/kg body weight/day remains an appropriate recommendation. The results of this systematic review support a shift in caffeine research to focus on characterizing effects in sensitive populations and establishing better quantitative characterization of interindividual variability (e.g., epigenetic trends), subpopulations (e.g., unhealthy populations, individuals with preexisting conditions), conditions (e.g., coexposures), and outcomes (e.g., exacerbation of risk-taking behavior) that could render individuals to be at greater risk relative to healthy adults and healthy pregnant women. This review, being one of the first to apply systematic review methodologies to toxicological assessments, also highlights the need for refined guidance and frameworks unique to the conduct of systematic review in this field.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Caffeine; Coffee; Pregnancy; Safety; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28438661     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  58 in total

1.  Eat to Beat Stress.

Authors:  Uma Naidoo
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2020-12-08

2.  Life-course approaches to investigate adverse effects of caffeine.

Authors:  Sylvia H Ley
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  Impaired tissue barriers as potential therapeutic targets for Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Xin Fang
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 4.  International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance.

Authors:  Nanci S Guest; Trisha A VanDusseldorp; Michael T Nelson; Jozo Grgic; Brad J Schoenfeld; Nathaniel D M Jenkins; Shawn M Arent; Jose Antonio; Jeffrey R Stout; Eric T Trexler; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Erica R Goldstein; Douglas S Kalman; Bill I Campbell
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 5.  Impacts of Caffeine during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Jingjing Qian; Qi Chen; Sean M Ward; Enkui Duan; Ying Zhang
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 12.015

6.  A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

Authors:  Paul Sadek; Xiao Pan; Phil Shepherd; Elise Malandain; John Carney; Hugh Coleman
Journal:  J Caffeine Res       Date:  2017-12-01

7.  Coffee and tea drinking in relation to risk of hip fracture in the Singapore Chinese Health Study.

Authors:  Zhaoli Dai; Aizhen Jin; Avril Zixin Soh; Li-Wei Ang; Jian-Min Yuan; Woon-Puay Koh
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Neuro-obstetrics: A multidisciplinary approach to care of women with neurologic disease.

Authors:  Ingrid A Brussé; Anna C M Kluivers; Maria D Zambrano; Kara Shetler; Eliza C Miller
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2020

9.  Construction of Caffeine-Inducible Gene Switches in Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Daniel Bojar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

10.  Natural history of insomnia symptoms in the transition from childhood to adolescence: population rates, health disparities, and risk factors.

Authors:  Julio Fernandez-Mendoza; Elizaveta Bourchtein; Susan Calhoun; Kristina Puzino; Cynthia K Snyder; Fan He; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Duanping Liao; Edward Bixler
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.