Robert L Coleman1, Mark F Brady2, Thomas J Herzog3, Paul Sabbatini4, Deborah K Armstrong5, Joan L Walker6, Byoung-Gie Kim7, Keiichi Fujiwara8, Krishnansu S Tewari9, David M O'Malley10, Susan A Davidson11, Stephen C Rubin12, Paul DiSilvestro13, Karen Basen-Engquist14, Helen Huang2, John K Chan15, Nick M Spirtos16, Raheela Ashfaq17, Robert S Mannel6. 1. Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: rcoleman@mdanderson.org. 2. NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistics & Data Center, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 4. Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwayn University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka-Shi, Japan. 9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA. 10. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. 11. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. 12. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 13. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA. 14. Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 15. Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA. 16. Women's Cancer Center, Las Vegas, NV, USA. 17. Miraca Life Sciences, Irving, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy doublets are a standard of care for women with ovarian cancer recurring 6 months after completion of initial therapy. In this study, we aimed to explore the roles of secondary surgical cytoreduction and bevacizumab in this population, and report the results of the bevacizumab component here. METHODS: The multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 GOG-0213 trial was done in 67 predominantly academic centres in the USA (65 centres), Japan (one centre), and South Korea (one centre). Eligible patients were adult women (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent measurable or evaluable epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer, and a clinical complete response to primary platinum-based chemotherapy, who had been disease-free for at least 6 months following last infused cycle of platinum. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to standard chemotherapy (six 3-weekly cycles of paclitaxel [175 mg/m2 of body surface area] and carboplatin [area under the curve 5]) or the same chemotherapy regimen plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg of bodyweight) every 3 weeks and continued as maintenance every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Individuals who participated in both the bevacizumab objective and surgical objective (which is ongoing) were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive either of these two chemotherapy regimens with or without prior secondary cytoreductive surgery. Randomisation for the bevacizumab objective was stratified by treatment-free interval and participation in the surgical objective. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00565851. FINDINGS: Between Dec 10, 2007, and Aug 26, 2011, 674 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to standard chemotherapy (n=337) or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (n=377). Median follow-up at the end of the trial on Nov 5, 2014, was 49·6 months in each treatment group (IQR 41·5-62·2 for chemotherapy plus bevacizumab; IQR 40·8-59·3 for chemotherapy), at which point 415 patients had died (214 in the chemotherapy group and 201 in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group). Based on pretreatment stratification data, median overall survival in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group was 42·2 months (95% CI 37·7-46·2) versus 37·3 months (32·6-39·7) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·829; 95% CI 0·683-1·005; p=0·056). We identified incorrect treatment-free interval stratification data for 45 (7%) patients (equally balanced between treatment groups); a sensitivity analysis of overall survival based on the audited treatment-free interval stratification data gave an adjusted HR of 0·823 (95% CI 0·680-0·996; p=0·0447). In the safety population (all patients who initiated treatment), 317 (96%) of 325 patients in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event compared with 282 (86%) of 332 in the chemotherapy group; the most frequently reported of these in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group compared with the chemotherapy group were hypertension (39 [12%] vs two [1%]), fatigue (27 [8%] vs eight [2%]), and proteinuria (27 [8%] vs none). Two (1%) treatment-related deaths occurred in the chemotherapy group (infection [n=1] and myelodysplastic syndrome [n=1]) compared with nine (3%) in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group (infection [n=1], febrile neutropenia [n=1], myelodysplastic syndrome [n=1], secondary malignancy [n=1]; deaths not classified with CTCAE terms: disease progression [n=3], sudden death [n=1], and not specified [n=1]). INTERPRETATION: The addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy, followed by maintenance therapy until progression, improved the median overall survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Although the intention-to-treat analysis for overall survival was not significant, our sensitivity analysis based on corrected treatment-free interval stratification indicates that this strategy might be an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in these patients. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute and Genentech.
BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy doublets are a standard of care for women with ovarian cancer recurring 6 months after completion of initial therapy. In this study, we aimed to explore the roles of secondary surgical cytoreduction and bevacizumab in this population, and report the results of the bevacizumab component here. METHODS: The multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 GOG-0213 trial was done in 67 predominantly academic centres in the USA (65 centres), Japan (one centre), and South Korea (one centre). Eligible patients were adult women (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent measurable or evaluable epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer, and a clinical complete response to primary platinum-based chemotherapy, who had been disease-free for at least 6 months following last infused cycle of platinum. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to standard chemotherapy (six 3-weekly cycles of paclitaxel [175 mg/m2 of body surface area] and carboplatin [area under the curve 5]) or the same chemotherapy regimen plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg of bodyweight) every 3 weeks and continued as maintenance every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Individuals who participated in both the bevacizumab objective and surgical objective (which is ongoing) were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive either of these two chemotherapy regimens with or without prior secondary cytoreductive surgery. Randomisation for the bevacizumab objective was stratified by treatment-free interval and participation in the surgical objective. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00565851. FINDINGS: Between Dec 10, 2007, and Aug 26, 2011, 674 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to standard chemotherapy (n=337) or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (n=377). Median follow-up at the end of the trial on Nov 5, 2014, was 49·6 months in each treatment group (IQR 41·5-62·2 for chemotherapy plus bevacizumab; IQR 40·8-59·3 for chemotherapy), at which point 415 patients had died (214 in the chemotherapy group and 201 in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group). Based on pretreatment stratification data, median overall survival in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group was 42·2 months (95% CI 37·7-46·2) versus 37·3 months (32·6-39·7) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·829; 95% CI 0·683-1·005; p=0·056). We identified incorrect treatment-free interval stratification data for 45 (7%) patients (equally balanced between treatment groups); a sensitivity analysis of overall survival based on the audited treatment-free interval stratification data gave an adjusted HR of 0·823 (95% CI 0·680-0·996; p=0·0447). In the safety population (all patients who initiated treatment), 317 (96%) of 325 patients in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event compared with 282 (86%) of 332 in the chemotherapy group; the most frequently reported of these in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group compared with the chemotherapy group were hypertension (39 [12%] vs two [1%]), fatigue (27 [8%] vs eight [2%]), and proteinuria (27 [8%] vs none). Two (1%) treatment-related deaths occurred in the chemotherapy group (infection [n=1] and myelodysplastic syndrome [n=1]) compared with nine (3%) in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group (infection [n=1], febrile neutropenia [n=1], myelodysplastic syndrome [n=1], secondary malignancy [n=1]; deaths not classified with CTCAE terms: disease progression [n=3], sudden death [n=1], and not specified [n=1]). INTERPRETATION: The addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy, followed by maintenance therapy until progression, improved the median overall survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Although the intention-to-treat analysis for overall survival was not significant, our sensitivity analysis based on corrected treatment-free interval stratification indicates that this strategy might be an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in these patients. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute and Genentech.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Timothy J Perren; Ann Marie Swart; Jacobus Pfisterer; Jonathan A Ledermann; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Gunnar Kristensen; Mark S Carey; Philip Beale; Andrés Cervantes; Christian Kurzeder; Andreas du Bois; Jalid Sehouli; Rainer Kimmig; Anne Stähle; Fiona Collinson; Sharadah Essapen; Charlie Gourley; Alain Lortholary; Frédéric Selle; Mansoor R Mirza; Arto Leminen; Marie Plante; Dan Stark; Wendi Qian; Mahesh K B Parmar; Amit M Oza Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K Basen-Engquist; D Bodurka-Bevers; M A Fitzgerald; K Webster; D Cella; S Hu; D M Gershenson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andreas du Bois; Alexander Reuss; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Philipp Harter; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Jacobus Pfisterer Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Chee Khoon Lee; Sarah Lord; Tami Grunewald; Val Gebski; Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard; Jalid Sehouli; Kathrine Woie; Mark Heywood; Christian Schauer; Ignace Vergote; Giovanni Scambia; Annamaria Ferrero; Philipp Harter; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Michael Friedlander Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Floor J Backes; Debra L Richardson; Georgia A McCann; Blair Smith; Ritu Salani; Eric L Eisenhauer; Jeffrey M Fowler; Larry J Copeland; David E Cohn; David M O'Malley Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Andreas du Bois; Anne Floquet; Jae-Weon Kim; Joern Rau; Josep M del Campo; Michael Friedlander; Sandro Pignata; Keiichi Fujiwara; Ignace Vergote; Nicoletta Colombo; Mansoor R Mirza; Bradley J Monk; Rainer Kimmig; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Rongyu Zang; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Klaus H Baumann; Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier; Jae-Hoon Kim; Christian Kurzeder; Anne Lesoin; Paul Vasey; Christian Marth; Ulrich Canzler; Giovanni Scambia; Muneaki Shimada; Paula Calvert; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Byoung-Gie Kim; Thomas J Herzog; Ionel Mitrica; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Qiong Wang; Rocco Crescenzo; Philipp Harter Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kathleen N Moore; Camille C Gunderson; Paul Sabbatini; D Scott McMeekin; Gina Mantia-Smaldone; Robert A Burger; Mark A Morgan; Ann M Kapoun; Rainer Karl Brachmann; Robert Stagg; Azeez Farooki; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Joanne O'Dwyer; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Robert Wylie; Saoirse O'Mahony; Michael O'Dwyer; Garry P Duffy; Eimear B Dolan Journal: Adv Ther (Weinh) Date: 2020-08-16
Authors: Ursula A Matulonis; Michael W Sill; Vicky Makker; David G Mutch; Jay W Carlson; Christopher J Darus; Robert S Mannel; David P Bender; Erin K Crane; Carol Aghajanian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-12-23 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Jung-Min Lee; Christina M Annunziata; John L Hays; Liang Cao; Peter Choyke; Minshu Yu; Daniel An; Ismail Baris Turkbey; Lori M Minasian; Seth M Steinberg; Helen Chen; John Wright; Elise C Kohn Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 5.482