Carly Hyland1, Ouahiba Laribi2. 1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. 2. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, CalEPA, Oakland, CA, USA. Electronic address: ouahiba.laribi@oehha.ca.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children of farmworkers may be chronically exposed to pesticides via the take-home exposure pathway. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this review was to analyze scientific literature evaluating the role of the take-home pesticide exposure pathway in children of agricultural workers. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken and inclusion criteria were applied to identify original articles of interest. Of the 30 articles included in this review, some belonged to the same studies, resulting in a total of 23 studies. Eight studies assessed environmental samples, nine collected biological samples, and the remaining six analyzed both. Eleven studies compared pesticide levels between farm and non-farm families. RESULTS: There is convincing evidence that children of farmworkers are exposed to pesticides at higher levels than "non-agricultural" children, even when residing in the same agricultural communities. These levels were shown to depend on the season, occupation, number of farmworkers per home, and type of crops. Other factors such as age, gender and, sex seem to also influence this pathway. Some studies have shown that pesticides used solely in agriculture are found only in households of farmworkers spraying these pesticides. Moreover, intervention studies have shown that behaviors among farmworkers can significantly lower exposure of people living in the same households as farmworkers. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The evidence presented here raises concerns regarding health effects associated with exposure to pesticides in children living in agricultural communities, and indicates that strategies should be developed to reduce exposures in these populations.
BACKGROUND:Children of farmworkers may be chronically exposed to pesticides via the take-home exposure pathway. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this review was to analyze scientific literature evaluating the role of the take-home pesticide exposure pathway in children of agricultural workers. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken and inclusion criteria were applied to identify original articles of interest. Of the 30 articles included in this review, some belonged to the same studies, resulting in a total of 23 studies. Eight studies assessed environmental samples, nine collected biological samples, and the remaining six analyzed both. Eleven studies compared pesticide levels between farm and non-farm families. RESULTS: There is convincing evidence that children of farmworkers are exposed to pesticides at higher levels than "non-agricultural" children, even when residing in the same agricultural communities. These levels were shown to depend on the season, occupation, number of farmworkers per home, and type of crops. Other factors such as age, gender and, sex seem to also influence this pathway. Some studies have shown that pesticides used solely in agriculture are found only in households of farmworkers spraying these pesticides. Moreover, intervention studies have shown that behaviors among farmworkers can significantly lower exposure of people living in the same households as farmworkers. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The evidence presented here raises concerns regarding health effects associated with exposure to pesticides in children living in agricultural communities, and indicates that strategies should be developed to reduce exposures in these populations.
Authors: Elizabeth Friedman; Marnie F Hazlehurst; Christine Loftus; Catherine Karr; Kelsey N McDonald; Jose Ricardo Suarez-Lopez Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Federico Castillo; Ana M Mora; Georgia L Kayser; Jennifer Vanos; Carly Hyland; Audrey R Yang; Brenda Eskenazi Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Dorothy L Dobbins; Haiying Chen; Milton J Cepeda; Lesley Berenson; Jennifer W Talton; Kim A Anderson; Jonathan H Burdette; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury; Paul J Laurienti Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Mohsen Bahrami; Sean L Simpson; Jonathan H Burdette; Robert G Lyday; Sara A Quandt; Haiying Chen; Thomas A Arcury; Paul J Laurienti Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 7.400
Authors: Carly Hyland; Robert B Gunier; Catherine Metayer; Michael N Bates; Catharina Wesseling; Ana M Mora Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Nicolas López-Gálvez; Rietta Wagoner; Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá; Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne; Melissa Furlong; El'gin Avila; Paloma Beamer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kristi Pullen Fedinick; Ilch Yiliqi; Yukyan Lam; David Lennett; Veena Singla; Miriam Rotkin-Ellman; Jennifer Sass Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 3.390