Literature DB >> 28437549

Poor Utility of Gonadal Shielding for Pediatric Pelvic Radiographs.

Mark C Lee, Jessica Lloyd, Matthew J Solomito.   

Abstract

Plain pelvic radiographs are commonly used for a variety of pediatric orthopedic disorders. Lead shielding is typically placed over the gonads to minimize radiation exposure to these sensitive tissues. However, misplaced shielding can sabotage efforts to protect patients from excessive radiation exposure either by not covering radiosensitive tissues or by obscuring anatomic areas of interest, prompting repeat radiographic examinations. The goal of this study was to determine the incidence of misplaced shielding for pelvic radiographs obtained for pediatric orthopedic evaluation. Children 8 to 16 years old who had an anteroposterior or frog lateral pelvic radiograph between 2008 and 2014 were included. A total of 3400 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 84 boys and 84 girls were randomly selected for review. For both boys and girls, the percentage of incorrectly positioned or missing shields was calculated. Chi-square testing was used to compare the frequency of missing or incorrectly placed shields between sexes and age groups. Pelvic shields were misplaced in 49% of anteroposterior and 63% of frog lateral radiographs. Shielding was misplaced more frequently for girls than for boys on frog lateral radiographs (76% vs 51%; P<.05). Pelvic bony landmarks were often obscured by pelvic shielding, with a frequency of 7% to 43%, depending on the specific landmark. The femoral head and acetabulum were obscured by shielding in up to 2% of all images. The findings suggest that accepted pelvic shielding protocols are ineffective. Consideration should be given to alternative protocols or abandonment of this practice. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e623-e627.]. Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28437549     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20170418-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

Review 1.  Protecting sensitive patient groups from imaging using ionizing radiation: effects during pregnancy, in fetal life and childhood.

Authors:  Paolo Tomà; Alessandra Bartoloni; Sergio Salerno; Claudio Granata; Vittorio Cannatà; Andrea Magistrelli; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Female gonadal shielding with automatic exposure control increases radiation risks.

Authors:  Summer L Kaplan; Dennise Magill; Marc A Felice; Rui Xiao; Sayed Ali; Xiaowei Zhu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-10-18

3.  Gonad shielding in pelvic radiography: modern optimised X-ray systems might allow its discontinuation.

Authors:  Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Gerhard Kütterer; Pierre J Kicken; Marij J Frantzen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Joachim E Wildberger; Gerrit J Kemerink
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-07

4.  Repeated Pelvic Radiographs in Infants, After Harness Treatment for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, Carry Very Low Radiation Risk.

Authors:  Elizabeth Vogel; Thomas Leaver; Fiona Wall; Ben Johnson; Michael Uglow; Alexander Aarvold
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Bismuth Pelvic X-Ray Shielding Reduces Radiation Dose Exposure in Pediatric Radiography.

Authors:  Bow Wang; Chien-Yi Ting; Cheng-Shih Lai; Yi-Shan Tsai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Gonadal shield: is it the Albatross hanging around the neck of developmental dysplasia of the hip research?

Authors:  A Kumar; W W Chau; A L-H Hung; J K-T Wong; B K W Ng; J C Y Cheng
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.