Literature DB >> 28437341

Measurement of Thoracic Inlet Alignment on MRI: Reliability and the Influence of Body Position.

Jun Qiao1, Feng Zhu, Zhen Liu, Leilei Xu, Zezhang Zhu, Bangping Qian, Xu Sun, Qing Jiang, Yong Qiu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective radiographic study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure thoracic outlet parameters and whether supine MRI could supersede upright x-ray in measuring these parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: On x-ray, overlapped soft and bony tissues make sternum contour invisible. Thus, measuring thoracic inlet (TI) alignment on x-ray may be inaccurate. MRI could clearly show anatomy around TI.
METHODS: A total of 124 adolescents with idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis were recruited. The visibility of T1 upper endplate and the upper end of sternum on the lateral standing x-ray films was rated. For patients with moderate or good clarity forT1 upper endplate and the upper end of sternum on x-ray films, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope (T1S), and neck tilt (NT) were measured by 3 observers on standing x-ray films and supine MR images, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine the intraobserver, interobserver, and method reliability. The paired t test was performed to compare the measurements between the 2 methods. The correlation coefficients between the 2 methods were analyzed by regression analysis.
RESULTS: The visibility of TI region on x-ray films was unsatisfactory, whereas all the landmarks were clear on MR images. Only 81 patients' x-ray films were graded as moderate or good visibility in the TI region. Both the intraobserver ICC and interobserver ICC were better in the MRI set than in the x-ray set among all the observers for 3 TI parameters. The paired t test demonstrated that no significant difference was noted in terms of TIA, T1S, and NT (P=0.572, 0.203, and 0.637, respectively). Regression analysis demonstrated high correlation coefficients for TIA, T1S, and NT (R=0.612, 0.629, and 0.722, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: MRI serves as a good substitute for x-ray scans with regard to the measurement of TI alignment, with superior reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28437341     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  3 in total

1.  Correlation of supine MRI and standing radiographs for cervical sagittal balance in myelopathy patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine Boudreau; Sylvine Carrondo Cottin; Jessica Ruel-Laliberté; David Mercier; Nicholas Gélinas-Phaneuf; Jérôme Paquet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation of cervical and thoracic inlet sagittal parameters by MRI and radiography in patients with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Jie Cheng; Peng Liu; Dong Sun; Zikun Ma; Jingpei Liu; Zhaolin Wang; Jianhui Mou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Relationship between TIA minus C0-7 angle and C2-7 SVA: analysis of 113 symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Xiang-Yu Li; Yu Wang; Chao Kong; Shi-Bao Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.