Literature DB >> 28437208

Considerations for Quality Improvement in Radiation Oncology Therapy for Patients with Uncomplicated Painful Bone Metastases.

Anne M Walling1,2,3, Phillip J Beron4, Tania Kaprealian4, Patrick A Kupelian4, Neil S Wenger2,3, Susan A McCloskey4, Christopher R King4, Michael Steinberg4.   

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing need for evidence-based efficiency in providing a growing amount of cancer care. One example of a quality gap is the use of multiple-fraction palliative radiation for patients with advanced cancer who have uncomplicated bone metastases; evidence suggests similar pain outcomes for treatment regimens with a lower burden of treatments.
Methods: During the first phase of quality improvement work, we used RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology to understand how radiation oncologists at one academic medical center rate the appropriateness of different treatment regimens for painful uncomplicated bone metastases. We compared radiation oncologist appropriateness ratings for radiation treatments with radiation therapy provided by these oncologists to patients with painful bone metastases between July 2012 and June 2013.
Results: Appropriateness ratings showed that single-fraction (8 Gy) treatment (a low burden treatment) was consistently considered an appropriate option to treat a variety of uncomplicated bone metastases. The use of >10 fractions was consistently rated as inappropriate regardless of other factors. Eighty-one patients receiving radiation therapy for painful bone metastases during the study period had an available medical record for chart abstraction. Almost one-third of metastases were considered complicated because of a concern of spinal cord compression, a history of prior irradiation, or an associated pathological fracture. Among uncomplicated bone metastases, 25% were treated with stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). Among the 54 uncomplicated bone metastases treated with conformal radiation, only one was treated with single-fraction treatment and 32% were treated with greater than 10 fractions. Conclusions: Treatment at the study site demonstrates room for improvement in providing low-burden radiation oncology treatments for patients with painful bone metastases. Choosing a radiation treatment schedule for patients with advanced cancer and painful bone metastases requires consideration of many medical and patient-centered factors. Our experience suggests that it will take more than the existence of guidelines to change practice in this area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advanced cancer; bone metastases; palliative care; quality of care; radiation oncology

Year:  2017        PMID: 28437208      PMCID: PMC5421511          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  36 in total

1.  Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases.

Authors:  William F Hartsell; Charles B Scott; Deborah Watkins Bruner; Charles W Scarantino; Robert A Ivker; Mack Roach; John H Suh; William F Demas; Benjamin Movsas; Ivy A Petersen; Andre A Konski; Charles S Cleeland; Nora A Janjan; Michelle DeSilvio
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® spinal bone metastases.

Authors:  Simon Shek-Man Lo; Stephen T Lutz; Eric L Chang; Nicholas Galanopoulos; David D Howell; Edward Y Kim; Andre A Konski; Neeta D Pandit-Taskar; Peter S Rose; Samuel Ryu; Larry N Silverman; Andrew E Sloan; Catherine Van Poznak
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  The quality of supportive care among inpatients dying with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Anne M Walling; Steven M Asch; Karl A Lorenz; Jennifer Malin; Carol P Roth; Tod Barry; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers.

Authors:  K E Steinhauser; N A Christakis; E C Clipp; M McNeilly; L McIntyre; J A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of dose-fractionation radiotherapy trials for the palliation of painful bone metastases.

Authors:  Jackson Sai-Yiu Wu; Rebecca Wong; Mary Johnston; Andrea Bezjak; Timothy Whelan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Evidence-based standards for cancer pain management.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Steven M Asch; Arash Naeim; Homayoon Sanati; Anne Walling; Karl A Lorenz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment.

Authors:  Alexi A Wright; Baohui Zhang; Alaka Ray; Jennifer W Mack; Elizabeth Trice; Tracy Balboni; Susan L Mitchell; Vicki A Jackson; Susan D Block; Paul K Maciejewski; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edward Chow; Kristin Harris; Grace Fan; May Tsao; Wai M Sze
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Long-term follow-up of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy for bone metastases: results from a randomised multicentre trial.

Authors:  Tonje Anette Sande; Randi Ruenes; Jo Asmund Lund; Oyvind S Bruland; Kjersti Hornslien; Roy Bremnes; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Radiotherapy fractionation for the palliation of uncomplicated painful bone metastases - an evidence-based practice guideline.

Authors:  Jackson Sai-Yiu Wu; Rebecca K S Wong; Nancy S Lloyd; Mary Johnston; Andrea Bezjak; Timothy Whelan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

1.  Trends in Radiation for Bone Metastasis During a Period of Multiple National Quality Improvement Initiatives.

Authors:  Jennifer K Logan; Jing Jiang; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Xiudong Lei; Ying Xu; Karen E Hoffman; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  The Timeliness Initiative: Continuous Process Improvement for Prompt Initiation of Radiation Therapy Treatment.

Authors:  Nzhde Agazaryan; Phillip Chow; James Lamb; Minsong Cao; Ann Raldow; Phillip Beron; John Hegde; Michael Steinberg
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-03-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.