Literature DB >> 28436828

Sensory profile and volatile aroma composition of reduced alcohol Merlot wines fermented with Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Saccharomyces uvarum.

C Varela1, A Barker2, T Tran2, A Borneman2, C Curtin2.   

Abstract

Strategies for production of wines containing lower alcohol concentrations are in strong demand, for reasons of quality, health, and taxation. Development and application of wine yeasts that are less efficient at transforming grape sugars into ethanol has the potential to allow winemakers the freedom to make lower alcohol wines from grapes harvested at optimal ripeness, without the need for post-fermentation processes aimed at removing ethanol. We have recently shown that two non-conventional wine yeast species Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Saccharomyces uvarum were both able to produce wine with reduced alcohol concentration. Both species produced laboratory-scale wines with markedly different volatile aroma compound composition relative to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This work describes the volatile composition and sensory profiles of reduced-alcohol pilot-scale Merlot wines produced with M. pulcherrima and S. uvarum. Wines fermented with M. pulcherrima contained 1.0% v/v less ethanol than S. cerevisiae fermented wines, while those fermented with S. uvarum showed a 1.7% v/v reduction in ethanol. Compared to S. cerevisiae ferments, wines produced with M. pulcherrima showed higher concentrations of ethyl acetate, total esters, total higher alcohols and total sulfur compounds, while wines fermented with S. uvarum were characterised by the highest total concentration of higher alcohols. Sensorially, M. pulcherrima wines received relatively high scores for sensory descriptors such as red fruit and fruit flavour and overall exhibited a sensory profile similar to that of wine made with S. cerevisiae, whereas the main sensory descriptors associated with wines fermented with S. uvarum were barnyard and meat. This work demonstrates the successful application of M. pulcherrima AWRI3050 for the production of pilot-scale red wines with reduced alcohol concentration and highlights the need for rigorous evaluation of non-conventional yeasts with regard to their sensory impacts.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flavour; Low alcohol; Metagenomics; Non-Saccharomyces; Wine; Yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28436828     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  15 in total

1.  Use of Indigenous Hanseniaspora vineae and Metschnikowia pulcherrima Co-fermentation With Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Improve the Aroma Diversity of Vidal Blanc Icewine.

Authors:  Bo-Qin Zhang; Jing-Yun Shen; Chang-Qing Duan; Guo-Liang Yan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Effect of sulfite addition and pied de cuve inoculation on the microbial communities and sensory profiles of Chardonnay wines: dominance of indigenous Saccharomyces uvarum at a commercial winery.

Authors:  Sydney C Morgan; Garrett C McCarthy; Brittany S Watters; Mansak Tantikachornkiat; Ieva Zigg; Margaret A Cliff; Daniel M Durall
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Microbial dynamics in industrial-scale wine fermentation employing Hanseniaspora uvarum β-glucosidase-producer strain.

Authors:  Cintia Rompkovksi; Bruna Carla Agustini; Flavia Deffert; Maria Goreti Amboni Stadtlober; Debora Brand; Gildo Almeida da Silva; Tania Maria Bordin Bonfim
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  Yeast species isolated from Texas High Plains vineyards and dynamics during spontaneous fermentations of Tempranillo grapes.

Authors:  Matthias Bougreau; Kenia Ascencio; Marie Bugarel; Kendra Nightingale; Guy Loneragan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Rapid Method for Selecting Non-Saccharomyces Strains with a Low Ethanol Yield.

Authors:  Xiaolin Zhu; Yurena Navarro; Albert Mas; María-Jesús Torija; Gemma Beltran
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 6.  Yeast-Yeast Interactions: Mechanisms, Methodologies and Impact on Composition.

Authors:  Fanny Bordet; Alexis Joran; Géraldine Klein; Chloé Roullier-Gall; Hervé Alexandre
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-20

7.  Effect of Musts Oxygenation at Various Stages of Cider Production on Oenological Parameters, Antioxidant Activity, and Profile of Volatile Cider Compounds.

Authors:  Tomasz Tarko; Aleksandra Duda-Chodak; Paweł Sroka; Magdalena Januszek
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-06-10

8.  Non-Saccharomyces yeast and lactic acid bacteria in Co-inoculated fermentations with two Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains: A strategy to improve the phenolic content of Syrah wine.

Authors:  P P Minnaar; H W du Plessis; N P Jolly; M van der Rijst; M du Toit
Journal:  Food Chem X       Date:  2019-10-11

9.  The aptitude of commercial yeast strains for lowering the ethanol content of wine.

Authors:  Vladimir S Puškaš; Uroš D Miljić; Jovana J Djuran; Vesna M Vučurović
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.863

10.  Comparison of Volatile Composition between Alcoholic Bilberry Beverages Fermented with Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts and Dynamic Changes in Volatile Compounds during Fermentation.

Authors:  Shuxun Liu; Oskar Laaksonen; Alexis Marsol-Vall; Baoqing Zhu; Baoru Yang
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.