Filip Poelaert1, Caroline Verbaeys2, Bernard Rappe3, Bart Kimpe4, Ignace Billiet5, Hendrik Plancke6, Karel Decaestecker7, Valérie Fonteyne8, Sarah Buelens7, Nicolaas Lumen7. 1. Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: filip.poelaert@uzgent.be. 2. Department of Urology, AZ Jan Palfijn, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Department of Urology, ASZ Aalst, Aalst, Belgium. 4. Department of Urology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Bruges, Belgium. 5. Department of Urology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium. 6. Department of Urology, Imelda Ziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium. 7. Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the context of the LoMP trial (which investigates the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy [cRP] in addition to standard of care [SoC]) and to provide a preliminary analysis of patient's characteristics, safety of cRP, and early local symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: cRP was performed in asymptomatic patients with a resectable tumor and who were fit to undergo surgery (group A, n = 17). Only SoC was administered to patients with metastatic prostate cancer ineligible or unwilling to undergo cRP (group B, n = 29). At 3 months, surgical complications related to cRP and local symptoms for both groups were evaluated. RESULTS:Median operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay for cRP were 215 minutes (150-290), 250 mL (100-900), and 4 days (2-7), respectively. Respectively 5 (29.4%) and 2 (11.8%) patients suffered grades 1 and 2 complications within 3 months postoperatively. When compared with Group B, patients in group A were younger (64 vs 72 years, P = .005), had lower initial prostate-specific antigen (15.9 vs 156 µg/L, P = .002), and less high-volume metastatic disease (5.9% vs 69%, P <.001). At 3 months, 5 (29.4%) patients in group A reported stress urinary incontinence without any further local symptoms. In group B, respectively 2 (6.8%), 11 (37.9%), and 2 (6.8%) patients suffered urge incontinence, obstructive voiding needing medical intervention, and ureteric obstruction. CONCLUSION: In a group of well-selected patients, cRP is safe. These patients have more favorable characteristics compared with patients treated with only SoC. If only SoC can be offered, patients are at risk to suffer from local symptoms.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the context of the LoMP trial (which investigates the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy [cRP] in addition to standard of care [SoC]) and to provide a preliminary analysis of patient's characteristics, safety of cRP, and early local symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: cRP was performed in asymptomatic patients with a resectable tumor and who were fit to undergo surgery (group A, n = 17). Only SoC was administered to patients with metastatic prostate cancer ineligible or unwilling to undergo cRP (group B, n = 29). At 3 months, surgical complications related to cRP and local symptoms for both groups were evaluated. RESULTS: Median operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay for cRP were 215 minutes (150-290), 250 mL (100-900), and 4 days (2-7), respectively. Respectively 5 (29.4%) and 2 (11.8%) patients suffered grades 1 and 2 complications within 3 months postoperatively. When compared with Group B, patients in group A were younger (64 vs 72 years, P = .005), had lower initial prostate-specific antigen (15.9 vs 156 µg/L, P = .002), and less high-volume metastatic disease (5.9% vs 69%, P <.001). At 3 months, 5 (29.4%) patients in group A reported stress urinary incontinence without any further local symptoms. In group B, respectively 2 (6.8%), 11 (37.9%), and 2 (6.8%) patients suffered urge incontinence, obstructive voiding needing medical intervention, and ureteric obstruction. CONCLUSION: In a group of well-selected patients, cRP is safe. These patients have more favorable characteristics compared with patients treated with only SoC. If only SoC can be offered, patients are at risk to suffer from local symptoms.
Authors: Bertram E Yuh; Young Suk Kwon; Brian M Shinder; Eric A Singer; Thomas L Jang; Sinae Kim; Mark N Stein; Tina Mayer; Anna Ferrari; Nara Lee; Rahul R Parikh; Nora Ruel; Wun-Jae Kim; Shigeo Horie; Seok-Soo Byun; Thomas E Ahlering; Isaac Yi Kim Journal: Prostate Int Date: 2018-10-25
Authors: Johannes Linxweiler; Turkan Hajili; Philip Zeuschner; Michael D Menger; Michael Stöckle; Kerstin Junker; Matthias Saar Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Carlo Cattrini; Elena Castro; Rebeca Lozano; Elisa Zanardi; Alessandra Rubagotti; Francesco Boccardo; David Olmos Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Nicolaas Lumen; Elise De Bleser; Sarah Buelens; Wesley Verla; Filip Poelaert; Wietse Claeys; Valérie Fonteyne; Sofie Verbeke; Geert Villeirs; Kathia De Man; Sylvie Rottey; Charles Van Praet; Karel Decaestecker; Piet Ost Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2021-06-05