Literature DB >> 28435034

Cytoreductive Prostatectomy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: First Lessons Learned From the Multicentric Prospective Local Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer (LoMP) Trial.

Filip Poelaert1, Caroline Verbaeys2, Bernard Rappe3, Bart Kimpe4, Ignace Billiet5, Hendrik Plancke6, Karel Decaestecker7, Valérie Fonteyne8, Sarah Buelens7, Nicolaas Lumen7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the context of the LoMP trial (which investigates the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy [cRP] in addition to standard of care [SoC]) and to provide a preliminary analysis of patient's characteristics, safety of cRP, and early local symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: cRP was performed in asymptomatic patients with a resectable tumor and who were fit to undergo surgery (group A, n = 17). Only SoC was administered to patients with metastatic prostate cancer ineligible or unwilling to undergo cRP (group B, n = 29). At 3 months, surgical complications related to cRP and local symptoms for both groups were evaluated.
RESULTS: Median operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay for cRP were 215 minutes (150-290), 250 mL (100-900), and 4 days (2-7), respectively. Respectively 5 (29.4%) and 2 (11.8%) patients suffered grades 1 and 2 complications within 3 months postoperatively. When compared with Group B, patients in group A were younger (64 vs 72 years, P = .005), had lower initial prostate-specific antigen (15.9 vs 156 µg/L, P = .002), and less high-volume metastatic disease (5.9% vs 69%, P <.001). At 3 months, 5 (29.4%) patients in group A reported stress urinary incontinence without any further local symptoms. In group B, respectively 2 (6.8%), 11 (37.9%), and 2 (6.8%) patients suffered urge incontinence, obstructive voiding needing medical intervention, and ureteric obstruction.
CONCLUSION: In a group of well-selected patients, cRP is safe. These patients have more favorable characteristics compared with patients treated with only SoC. If only SoC can be offered, patients are at risk to suffer from local symptoms.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28435034     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.02.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  Oncological Outcome of Combining Cytoreductive Prostatectomy and Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer and Bone Oligometastases: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peng Xue; Ziyu Wu; Kunpen Wang; Guojun Gao; Min Zhuang; Miao Yan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Perspective on cytoreduction and metastasis-directed therapy in node positive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Karel Decaestecker; Valérie Fonteyne; Willem Oosterlinck
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-12

3.  Round-up.

Authors:  Apul Goel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

4.  Results of Phase 1 study on cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bertram E Yuh; Young Suk Kwon; Brian M Shinder; Eric A Singer; Thomas L Jang; Sinae Kim; Mark N Stein; Tina Mayer; Anna Ferrari; Nara Lee; Rahul R Parikh; Nora Ruel; Wun-Jae Kim; Shigeo Horie; Seok-Soo Byun; Thomas E Ahlering; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2018-10-25

5.  Primary Tumor Resection Decelerates Disease Progression in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Johannes Linxweiler; Turkan Hajili; Philip Zeuschner; Michael D Menger; Michael Stöckle; Kerstin Junker; Matthias Saar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Comparing the Survival Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiotherapy for Patients With De Novo Metastasis Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Guo; Haoran Xia; Xiaonan Su; Huiming Hou; Qiuzi Zhong; Jianye Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Potential Cancer Control in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kimiaki Takagi; Makoto Kawase; Daiki Kato; Kota Kawase; Manabu Takai; Koji Iinuma; Keita Nakane; Noriyasu Hagiwara; Toru Yamada; Masayuki Tomioka; Takuya Koie
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 8.  Emerging role of cytoreductive prostatectomy in patients with metastatic disease.

Authors:  Yasmeen Jaber; Chad A Reichard; Brian F Chapin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-09

Review 9.  Current Treatment Options for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Cattrini; Elena Castro; Rebeca Lozano; Elisa Zanardi; Alessandra Rubagotti; Francesco Boccardo; David Olmos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  The Role of Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Low-volume Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Results from the Local Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer (LoMP) Registry.

Authors:  Nicolaas Lumen; Elise De Bleser; Sarah Buelens; Wesley Verla; Filip Poelaert; Wietse Claeys; Valérie Fonteyne; Sofie Verbeke; Geert Villeirs; Kathia De Man; Sylvie Rottey; Charles Van Praet; Karel Decaestecker; Piet Ost
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-06-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.