Literature DB >> 28434821

An overview of geophysical technologies appropriate for characterization and monitoring at fractured-rock sites.

Frederick D Day-Lewis1, Lee D Slater2, Judy Robinson2, Carole D Johnson1, Neil Terry1, Dale Werkema3.   

Abstract

Geophysical methods are used increasingly for characterization and monitoring at remediation sites in fractured-rock aquifers. The complex heterogeneity of fractured rock poses enormous challenges to groundwater remediation professionals, and new methods are needed to cost-effectively infer fracture and fracture-zone locations, orientations and properties, and to develop conceptual site models for flow and transport. Despite the potential of geophysical methods to "see" between boreholes, two issues have impeded the adoption of geophysical methods by remediation professionals. First, geophysical results are commonly only indirectly related to the properties of interest (e.g., permeability) to remediation professionals, and qualitative or quantitative interpretation is required to convert geophysical results to hydrogeologic information. Additional demonstration/evaluation projects are needed in the site remediation literature to fully transfer geophysical methods from research to practice. Second, geophysical methods are commonly viewed as inherently risky by remediation professionals. Although it is widely understood that a given method may or may not work at a particular site, the reasons are not always clear to end users of geophysical products. Synthetic modeling tools are used in research to assess the potential of a particular method to successfully image a target, but these tools are not widely used in industry. Here, we seek to advance the application of geophysical methods to solve problems facing remediation professionals with respect to fractured-rock aquifers. To this end, we (1) provide an overview of geophysical methods applied to characterization and monitoring of fractured-rock aquifers; (2) review case studies showcasing different geophysical methods; and (3) discuss best practices for method selection and rejection based on synthetic modeling and decision support tools. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borehole logging; Characterization; Fractured rock; Geophysics; Remediation; Technology transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28434821      PMCID: PMC5894821          DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  5 in total

1.  Plume persistence in fractured sedimentary rock after source zone removal.

Authors:  Beth L Parker; Steven W Chapman; John A Cherry
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  A Fractured Rock Geophysical Toolbox Method Selection Tool.

Authors:  F D Day-Lewis; C D Johnson; L D Slater; J L Robinson; J H Williams; C L Boyden; D Werkema; J W Lane
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Imaging Pathways in Fractured Rock Using Three-Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography.

Authors:  Judith Robinson; Lee Slater; Timothy Johnson; Allen Shapiro; Claire Tiedeman; Dimitrios Ntarlagiannis; Carole Johnson; Frederick Day-Lewis; Pierre Lacombe; Thomas Imbrigiotta; John Lane
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  In-situ magnetic susceptibility measurements as a tool to follow geomicrobiological transformation of Fe minerals.

Authors:  Katharina Porsch; Urs Dippon; Moti Lal Rijal; Erwin Appel; Andreas Kappler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  A computer program for flow-log analysis of single holes (FLASH).

Authors:  Frederick D Day-Lewis; Carole D Johnson; Frederick L Paillet; Keith J Halford
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.671

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reactive Transport Simulation of Fracture Channelization and Transmissivity Evolution.

Authors:  Hang Deng; Catherine A Peters
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 1.907

2.  Geostatistical spatial projection of geophysical parameters for practical aquifer mapping.

Authors:  Jagriti Dabas; Sarah Sarah; N C Mondal; Shakeel Ahmed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.