Literature DB >> 28434180

Stated Uptake of Physical Activity Rewards Programmes Among Active and Insufficiently Active Full-Time Employees.

Semra Ozdemir1, Marcel Bilger1, Eric A Finkelstein2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Employers are increasingly relying on rewards programmes in an effort to promote greater levels of activity among employees; however, if enrolment in these programmes is dominated by active employees, then they are unlikely to be a good use of resources.
OBJECTIVE: This study uses a stated-preference survey to better understand who participates in rewards-based physical activity programmes, and to quantify stated uptake by active and insufficiently active employees.
METHODS: The survey was fielded to a national sample of 950 full-time employees in Singapore between 2012 and 2013. Participants were asked to choose between hypothetical rewards programmes that varied along key dimensions and whether or not they would join their preferred programme if given the opportunity. A mixed logit model was used to analyse the data and estimate predicted uptake for specific programmes. We then simulated employer payments based on predictions for the percentage of each type of employee likely to meet the activity goal.
RESULTS: Stated uptake ranged from 31 to 67% of employees, depending on programme features. For each programme, approximately two-thirds of those likely to enrol were insufficiently active.
CONCLUSION: Results showed that insufficiently active employees, who represent the majority, are attracted to rewards-based physical activity programmes, and at approximately the same rate as active employees, even when enrolment fees are required. This suggests that a programme with generous rewards and a modest enrolment fee may have strong employee support and be within the range of what employers may be willing to spend.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active Employee; Charitable Donation; Mixed Logit; Physical Activity Programme; Random Utility Model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28434180      PMCID: PMC5603679          DOI: 10.1007/s40258-017-0327-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  19 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review of Financial Incentives for Physical Activity: The Effects on Physical Activity and Related Outcomes.

Authors:  Jeroen C M Barte; G C Wanda Wendel-Vos
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.104

2.  A randomized study of financial incentives to increase physical activity among sedentary older adults.

Authors:  Eric A Finkelstein; Derek S Brown; David R Brown; David M Buchner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Design and baseline characteristics of participants in the TRial of Economic Incentives to Promote Physical Activity (TRIPPA): a randomized controlled trial of a six month pedometer program with financial incentives.

Authors:  Eric A Finkelstein; Aarti Sahasranaman; Geraldine John; Benjamin A Haaland; Marcel Bilger; Robert A Sloan; Ei Ei Khaing Nang; Kelly R Evenson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity.

Authors:  Sindre M Dyrstad; Bjørge H Hansen; Ingar M Holme; Sigmund A Anderssen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Cardiovascular fitness is associated with bias between self-reported and objectively measured physical activity.

Authors:  S A Tomaz; E V Lambert; D Karpul; T L Kolbe-Alexander
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.050

6.  Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Mandy Ryan; Karen Gerard
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Patterns of physical activity and sedentary behavior in a representative sample of a multi-ethnic South-East Asian population: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Aye Mya Win; Lim Wei Yen; Kristin H X Tan; Raymond Boon Tar Lim; Kee Seng Chia; Falk Mueller-Riemenschneider
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Effects of financial incentives on motivating physical activity among older adults: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Muhammad Assad Farooqui; Yock-Theng Tan; Marcel Bilger; Eric A Finkelstein
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour.

Authors:  Claire L Cleland; Ruth F Hunter; Frank Kee; Margaret E Cupples; James F Sallis; Mark A Tully
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Semra Ozdemir; Jia Jia Lee; Isha Chaudhry; Remee Rose Quintana Ocampo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.883

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.