Literature DB >> 28434131

Knowing How and Knowing Why: testing the effect of instruction designed for cognitive integration on procedural skills transfer.

Jeffrey J H Cheung1,2, Kulamakan M Kulasegaram3,4, Nicole N Woods3,4, Carol-Anne Moulton3,5, Charlotte V Ringsted6, Ryan Brydges3,7,8.   

Abstract

Transfer is a desired outcome of simulation-based training, yet evidence for how instructional design features promote transfer is lacking. In clinical reasoning, transfer is improved when trainees experience instruction integrating basic science explanations with clinical signs and symptoms. To test whether integrated instruction has similar effects in procedural skills (i.e., psychomotor skills) training, we studied the impact of instruction that integrates conceptual (why) and procedural (how) knowledge on the retention and transfer of simulation-based lumbar puncture (LP) skill. Medical students (N = 30) were randomized into two groups that accessed different instructional videos during a 60-min self-regulated training session. An unintegrated video provided procedural How instruction via step-by-step demonstrations of LP, and an integrated video provided the same How instruction with integrated conceptual Why explanations (e.g., anatomy) for key steps. Two blinded raters scored post-test, retention, and transfer performances using a global rating scale. Participants also completed written procedural and conceptual knowledge tests. We used simple mediation regression analyses to assess the total and indirect effects (mediated by conceptual knowledge) of integrated instruction on retention and transfer. Integrated instruction was associated with improved conceptual (p < .001) but not procedural knowledge test scores (p = .11). We found no total effect of group (p > .05). We did find a positive indirect group effect on skill retention (B ab  = .93, p < .05) and transfer (B ab  = .59, p < .05), mediated through participants improved conceptual knowledge. Integrated instruction may improve trainees' skill retention and transfer through gains in conceptual knowledge. Such integrated instruction may be an instructional design feature for simulation-based training aimed at improving transfer outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basic science; Cognition; Instructional design; Integration; Path analysis; Procedural skills; Simulation; Transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28434131     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-017-9774-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  6 in total

1.  Why Content and Cognition Matter: Integrating Conceptual Knowledge to Support Simulation-Based Procedural Skills Transfer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J H Cheung; Kulamakan M Kulasegaram; Nicole N Woods; Ryan Brydges
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Postgraduate medical procedural skills: attainment of curricular competencies using enhanced simulation-based mastery learning at a novel national boot camp.

Authors:  Pauline McAleer; Victoria R Tallentire; Suzanne Anderson Stirling; Simon Edgar; James Tiernan
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 5.410

3.  A Descriptive Analysis of the Cumulative Experiences of Emergency Medicine Residents in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Kirsten V Loftus; Daniel J Schumacher; Matthew R Mittiga; Erin McDonough; Brad Sobolewski
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-06-25

4.  Modeling integration: co-teaching basic and clinical sciences medicine in the classroom.

Authors:  Joanne M Willey; Youn Seon Lim; Thomas Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2018-10-02

5.  Does group size matter during collaborative skills learning? A randomised study.

Authors:  Laerke Marijke Noerholk; Anne Mette Morcke; Kulamakan Kulasegaram; Lone N Nørgaard; Lotte Harmsen; Lisbeth Anita Andreasen; Nina Gros Pedersen; Vilma Johnsson; Anishan Vamadevan; Martin Grønnebaek Tolsgaard
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 7.647

6.  How cognitive psychology changed the face of medical education research.

Authors:  Henk G Schmidt; Silvia Mamede
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.853

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.