S Robert1, S Lesieur2, J Chastang3, V Kergoat4, J Dutertre4, P Chauvin2. 1. Sorbonne universités, UPMC université Paris 06, Inserm, institut Pierre-Louis d'épidémiologie et de santé publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), 27, rue Chaligny, 75012 Paris, France; Sorbonne universités, UPMC université Paris 06, faculté de médecine Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, département d'enseignement et de recherche en médecine générale, 75012 Paris, France. Electronic address: sarah.robert@upmc.fr. 2. Sorbonne universités, UPMC université Paris 06, Inserm, institut Pierre-Louis d'épidémiologie et de santé publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), 27, rue Chaligny, 75012 Paris, France. 3. Sorbonne universités, UPMC université Paris 06, faculté de médecine Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, département d'enseignement et de recherche en médecine générale, 75012 Paris, France. 4. Mission locale de Sénart, 77127 Lieusaint, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In France, "missions locales" are public assistance units for young people aged 16-25 years not in employment, education or training (NEET). The health status of the more than 1.5 million young adults attending these units annually is unknown. The purpose of this study was to describe the health status and health care use of this population in comparison with the general population of the same age. METHODS: The Presaje survey was conducted in 2011 on a randomized sample of 1453 young adults aged 18-25 years who attended five "missions locales" in mainland France. Data were analyzed and compared with those of participants of the same age interviewed in a French national health survey (Baromètre Santé 2010, n=2899) and in a regional cohort (SIRS, n=204) conducted in the Greater Paris area, both in 2010. RESULTS: The overall social profiles of this NEET population was diverse, but with globally more difficult living conditions than in the general population. Health-related vulnerability factors identified were: insufficient health insurance; low educational level; numerous adverse experiences during childhood and social isolation. Some of their health indicators were remarkably poor in comparison with participants in the Baromètre santé study: 19.2 % (CI95 %=[17.2-21.3]) had a chronic disease-versus 8.2 % (CI95 %=[7.0-9.4]) (P<0.001); 31.9 % (CI95 %=[26.8-37.4]) were overweight or obese-versus 17.9 % (CI95 %=[16.3-19.6]) (P<0.001) and 19.6 % (CI95 %=[15.2-23.9]) were depressed-versus 7.3 %(CI95 %=[3.8-10.9]) (P<0.001). Compared with participants of the SIRS survey, fewer (70.4 %) (CI95 %=[68.0-72.7]) had a family doctor-versus 79.7 % (CI95 %=[73.1-86.2]) (P<0.05). Among the women in the Presaje survey, 38.0 % [30.5-45.4] had a regular gynecological follow-up-versus 80.9 % (CI95 %=[71.5-90.4]) in the SIRS survey (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Careful attention must be given to the young NEET population. Many of these youths are not familiar with health care services despite their important health care needs. Integrating health services into the "missions locales" may help detect health problems in this population, facilitating links to care.
BACKGROUND: In France, "missions locales" are public assistance units for young people aged 16-25 years not in employment, education or training (NEET). The health status of the more than 1.5 million young adults attending these units annually is unknown. The purpose of this study was to describe the health status and health care use of this population in comparison with the general population of the same age. METHODS: The Presaje survey was conducted in 2011 on a randomized sample of 1453 young adults aged 18-25 years who attended five "missions locales" in mainland France. Data were analyzed and compared with those of participants of the same age interviewed in a French national health survey (Baromètre Santé 2010, n=2899) and in a regional cohort (SIRS, n=204) conducted in the Greater Paris area, both in 2010. RESULTS: The overall social profiles of this NEET population was diverse, but with globally more difficult living conditions than in the general population. Health-related vulnerability factors identified were: insufficient health insurance; low educational level; numerous adverse experiences during childhood and social isolation. Some of their health indicators were remarkably poor in comparison with participants in the Baromètre santé study: 19.2 % (CI95 %=[17.2-21.3]) had a chronic disease-versus 8.2 % (CI95 %=[7.0-9.4]) (P<0.001); 31.9 % (CI95 %=[26.8-37.4]) were overweight or obese-versus 17.9 % (CI95 %=[16.3-19.6]) (P<0.001) and 19.6 % (CI95 %=[15.2-23.9]) were depressed-versus 7.3 %(CI95 %=[3.8-10.9]) (P<0.001). Compared with participants of the SIRS survey, fewer (70.4 %) (CI95 %=[68.0-72.7]) had a family doctor-versus 79.7 % (CI95 %=[73.1-86.2]) (P<0.05). Among the women in the Presaje survey, 38.0 % [30.5-45.4] had a regular gynecological follow-up-versus 80.9 % (CI95 %=[71.5-90.4]) in the SIRS survey (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Careful attention must be given to the young NEET population. Many of these youths are not familiar with health care services despite their important health care needs. Integrating health services into the "missions locales" may help detect health problems in this population, facilitating links to care.
Keywords:
Chômage; Disparités d’accès aux soins; Déterminants sociaux de la santé; Health care; Health status; Jeune adulte; Social determinants of health; Unemployment; Young adult; État de santé
Authors: Sohela Moussaoui; Pierre Chauvin; Gladys Ibanez; Marion Soler; Virginie Nael; Claire Morgand; Sarah Robert Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 5.801