Literature DB >> 28433213

Three-dimensional surgical modelling with an open-source software protocol: study of precision and reproducibility in mandibular reconstruction with the fibula free flap.

L Ganry1, J Quilichini2, C M Bandini2, P Leyder2, B Hersant3, J P Meningaud3.   

Abstract

Very few surgical teams currently use totally independent and free solutions to perform three-dimensional (3D) surgical modelling for osseous free flaps in reconstructive surgery. This study assessed the precision and technical reproducibility of a 3D surgical modelling protocol using free open-source software in mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps and surgical guides. Precision was assessed through comparisons of the 3D surgical guide to the sterilized 3D-printed guide, determining accuracy to the millimetre level. Reproducibility was assessed in three surgical cases by volumetric comparison to the millimetre level. For the 3D surgical modelling, a difference of less than 0.1mm was observed. Almost no deformations (<0.2mm) were observed post-autoclave sterilization of the 3D-printed surgical guides. In the three surgical cases, the average precision of fibula free flap modelling was between 0.1mm and 0.4mm, and the average precision of the complete reconstructed mandible was less than 1mm. The open-source software protocol demonstrated high accuracy without complications. However, the precision of the surgical case depends on the surgeon's 3D surgical modelling. Therefore, surgeons need training on the use of this protocol before applying it to surgical cases; this constitutes a limitation. Further studies should address the transfer of expertise.
Copyright © 2017 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D modelling; 3D printing; CAD–CAS; fibula free flap; mandibular reconstruction; surgical guide

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28433213     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach.

Authors:  Toshiaki Numajiri; Daiki Morita; Hiroko Nakamura; Ryo Yamochi; Shoko Tsujiko; Yoshihiro Sowa
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  In-House, Open-Source 3D-Software-Based, CAD/CAM-Planned Mandibular Reconstructions in 20 Consecutive Free Fibula Flap Cases: An Explorative Cross-Sectional Study With Three-Dimensional Performance Analysis.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Paul Kilbertus; Florian D Grill; Matthias Schwarz; Jochen Weitz; Markus Nieberler; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Andreas M Fichter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Ruipu Zhang; Ye Liang; Yujie Ma; Saiwen Song; Canhua Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  A 3-Dimensional-Printed Short-Segment Template Prototype for Mandibular Fracture Repair.

Authors:  Parul Sinha; Gary Skolnick; Kamlesh B Patel; Gregory H Branham; John J Chi
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  Improvement in home-staging three-dimensional virtual surgical planning via webinar during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Laurent Ganry; Michael Atlan; Quentin Qassemyar
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Three-Dimensional Printing of the Nasal Cavities for Clinical Experiments.

Authors:  Olli Valtonen; Jaakko Ormiskangas; Ilkka Kivekäs; Ville Rantanen; Marc Dean; Dennis Poe; Jorma Järnstedt; Jukka Lekkala; Pentti Saarenrinne; Markus Rautiainen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.