David S Freedman1, Nancy F Butte2, Elsie M Taveras3, Alyson B Goodman4, Cynthia L Ogden5, Heidi M Blanck4. 1. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: dxf1@cdc.gov. 2. Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, MA. 4. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. 5. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations among several body mass index (BMI) metrics (z-scores, percent of the 95th percentile (%BMIp95) and BMI minus 95th percentile (ΔBMIp95) as calculated in the growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It is known that the widely used BMI z-scores (BMIz) and percentiles calculated from the growth charts can differ substantially from those that directly observed in the data for BMIs above the 97th percentile (z = 1.88). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of 8.7 million 2- to 4-year-old children who were examined from 2008 through 2011 in the CDC's Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System. RESULTS: Because of the transformation used to calculate z-scores, the theoretical maximum BMIz varied by >3-fold across ages. This results in the conversion of very high BMIs into a narrow range of z-scores that varied by sex and age. Among children with severe obesity, levels of BMIz were only moderately correlated (r ~ 0.5) with %BMIp95 and ΔBMIp95. Among these children with severe obesity, BMIz levels could differ by more than 1 SD among children who had very similar levels of BMI, %BMIp95 and ΔBMIp95 due to differences in age or sex. CONCLUSIONS: The effective upper limit of BMIz values calculated from the CDC growth charts, which varies by sex and age, strongly influences the calculation of z-scores for children with severe obesity. Expressing these very high BMIs relative to the CDC 95th percentile, either as a difference or percentage, would be preferable to using BMI-for-age, particularly when assessing the effectiveness of interventions. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations among several body mass index (BMI) metrics (z-scores, percent of the 95th percentile (%BMIp95) and BMI minus 95th percentile (ΔBMIp95) as calculated in the growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It is known that the widely used BMI z-scores (BMIz) and percentiles calculated from the growth charts can differ substantially from those that directly observed in the data for BMIs above the 97th percentile (z = 1.88). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of 8.7 million 2- to 4-year-old children who were examined from 2008 through 2011 in the CDC's Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System. RESULTS: Because of the transformation used to calculate z-scores, the theoretical maximum BMIz varied by >3-fold across ages. This results in the conversion of very high BMIs into a narrow range of z-scores that varied by sex and age. Among children with severe obesity, levels of BMIz were only moderately correlated (r ~ 0.5) with %BMIp95 and ΔBMIp95. Among these children with severe obesity, BMIz levels could differ by more than 1 SD among children who had very similar levels of BMI, %BMIp95 and ΔBMIp95 due to differences in age or sex. CONCLUSIONS: The effective upper limit of BMIz values calculated from the CDC growth charts, which varies by sex and age, strongly influences the calculation of z-scores for children with severe obesity. Expressing these very high BMIs relative to the CDC 95th percentile, either as a difference or percentage, would be preferable to using BMI-for-age, particularly when assessing the effectiveness of interventions. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Hannah G Lawman; Cheryl D Fryar; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mary Savoye; Paulina Nowicka; Melissa Shaw; Sunkyung Yu; James Dziura; Georgia Chavent; Grace O'Malley; John B Serrecchia; William V Tamborlane; Sonia Caprio Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-02-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Violet Siwik; Randa Kutob; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Luis Cruz; Janet Senf; Mikel Aickin; Scott Going; Andrew Shatte Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: David S Freedman; Hannah G Lawman; Liping Pan; Asheley C Skinner; David B Allison; Lisa C McGuire; Heidi M Blanck Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: David S Freedman; Nancy F Butte; Elsie M Taveras; Alyson B Goodman; Heidi M Blanck Journal: Ann Hum Biol Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 1.533
Authors: Aaron S Kelly; Marsha D Marcus; Jack A Yanovski; Susan Z Yanovski; Stavroula K Osganian Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Melissa Chambers; Stephanie K Tanamas; Elena J Clark; Diana L Dunnigan; Chirag R Kapadia; Robert L Hanson; Robert G Nelson; William C Knowler; Madhumita Sinha Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Christine B San Giovanni; Brooke Sweeney; Joseph A Skelton; Megan M Kelsey; Aaron S Kelly Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Madison N LeCroy; Maria Bryant; Sandra S Albrecht; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Dianne S Ward; Jianwen Cai; June Stevens Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 3.092