Literature DB >> 28432432

TGFβ splicing and canonical pathway activation in high-grade serous carcinoma.

Neriya Gutgold1, Ben Davidson2,3, Liora Jacobs Catane1, Arild Holth4, Ellen Hellesylt4, Claes G Tropé5, Anne Dørum6, Reuven Reich7,8.   

Abstract

The present study analyzed the expression and clinical role of the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) pathway in high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), with focus on malignant effusions. TGFβ1-3 and TGFβRI-III mRNA expression by qRT-PCR was analyzed in 70 HGSC effusions and 55 solid specimens (28 ovarian, 27 abdominal metastases). Protein expression of Smad2 and Smad3 and their phosphorylated forms by Western blotting was analyzed in 73 specimens (42 effusions, 13 ovarian carcinomas, 18 solid metastases). Expression was analyzed for association with anatomic site and clinical parameters, including survival. TGFβRI and TGFβRII mRNA was overexpressed in effusions and solid metastases, particularly the former, compared to that in the ovarian tumors (p < 0.001 to p = 0.05), with anatomic site-dependent expression of splice variants. Conversely, Smad2, p-Smad2, and p-Smad3 were overexpressed in solid specimens (ovarian and peritoneal) compared to those in effusions (p < 0.001 for all). In univariate survival analysis, higher TGFβRI variant 1 and TGFβRIII mRNA levels were associated with a trend for shorter overall survival in patients with post-chemotherapy effusions (p = 0.066 and p = 0.087, respectively), and the latter was an independent prognostic marker in Cox multivariate analysis (p = 0.041). Smad3 protein expression was associated with a trend for shorter overall survival in univariate survival analysis (p = 0.052). TGFβ receptor splice variant expression is anatomic site-dependent in HGSC. Elevated levels of TGFβ signaling pathway mRNAs are seen in metastatic HGSC, but are not accompanied by increased Smad expression and activation in HGSC effusions, evidence of failure to activate canonical TGFβ signaling. Assessment of the prognostic role of this pathway in HGSC effusions merits further research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Effusion; High-grade serous carcinoma; Smad; TGFβ; Tumor progression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28432432     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2127-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  40 in total

1.  A short amino-acid sequence in MH1 domain is responsible for functional differences between Smad2 and Smad3.

Authors:  S Dennler; S Huet; J M Gauthier
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Type III TGF-beta receptor-independent signalling of TGF-beta2 via TbetaRII-B, an alternatively spliced TGF-beta type II receptor.

Authors:  D Rotzer; M Roth; M Lutz; D Lindemann; W Sebald; P Knaus
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  TGF-β signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer progression.

Authors:  Yoko Katsuno; Samy Lamouille; Rik Derynck
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 5.  Ovarian cancer: diagnostic, biological and prognostic aspects.

Authors:  Ben Davidson; Claes G Tropé
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  TGFbeta signalling: a complex web in cancer progression.

Authors:  Hiroaki Ikushima; Kohei Miyazono
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  TGF beta-induced Smad signaling remains intact in primary human ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Lesley D Dunfield; Elizabeth J Campbell Dwyer; Mark W Nachtigal
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.736

8.  Smad2 and Smad3 have opposing roles in breast cancer bone metastasis by differentially affecting tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  M Petersen; E Pardali; G van der Horst; H Cheung; C van den Hoogen; G van der Pluijm; P Ten Dijke
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Transforming growth factor-beta1, transforming growth factor-beta2, and transforming growth factor-beta3 enhance ovarian cancer metastatic potential by inducing a Smad3-dependent epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Thuy-Vy Do; Lena A Kubba; Hongyan Du; Charles D Sturgis; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.852

10.  Gene methylation of human ovarian carcinoma stromal progenitor cells promotes tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Chih-Ming Ho; Daniel Tzu-Bi Shih; Chih-Chiang Hsiao; Shih-Hung Huang; Shwu-Fen Chang; Wen-Fang Cheng
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  1 in total

1.  Splice-Variant Knock-Out of TGFβ Receptors Perturbates the Proteome of Ovarian Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Liora Jacobs Catane; Ofra Moshel; Yoav Smith; Ben Davidson; Reuven Reich
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.