Thorsten Lunau1, Nico Dragano2, Johannes Siegrist3, Morten Wahrendorf2. 1. Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. thorsten.lunau@uni-duesseldorf.de. 2. Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. 3. Work Stress Research, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In times of demographic change, maintaining health and employability of older employees is important. In this context, studies show that stressful working conditions differ by countries. Yet, it is unclear if specific national management practices to deal with these conditions contribute towards explaining country differences. METHODS: This study combines two different data sources. The first one provides detailed information on psychosocial working conditions in 17 European countries, based on 12,284 employees from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). We link this information to the second data source that provides information on health and safety management practices in each of the countries under study (collected among 17,477 managers at the level of companies in the Enterprise survey on new and emerging risks (ESENER)). We distinguish six different types of risk management procedures in the analysis. RESULTS: Results show that levels of psychosocial risks are generally lower in countries with more developed management practices, in particular if national management practices are marked by (1) procedures to deal with work stress, (2) information about whom to address in case of work-related psychosocial problems, and (3) health and safety services provided by psychologists. CONCLUSION: The findings underline the importance of a comprehensive psychosocial risk management approach in reducing work-related stress, as lower levels of psychosocial risks are linked to specific psychosocial risk management practices within companies, in particular those pointing to clear responsibilities and coordinated procedures in dealing with psychosocial risks.
BACKGROUND: In times of demographic change, maintaining health and employability of older employees is important. In this context, studies show that stressful working conditions differ by countries. Yet, it is unclear if specific national management practices to deal with these conditions contribute towards explaining country differences. METHODS: This study combines two different data sources. The first one provides detailed information on psychosocial working conditions in 17 European countries, based on 12,284 employees from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). We link this information to the second data source that provides information on health and safety management practices in each of the countries under study (collected among 17,477 managers at the level of companies in the Enterprise survey on new and emerging risks (ESENER)). We distinguish six different types of risk management procedures in the analysis. RESULTS: Results show that levels of psychosocial risks are generally lower in countries with more developed management practices, in particular if national management practices are marked by (1) procedures to deal with work stress, (2) information about whom to address in case of work-related psychosocial problems, and (3) health and safety services provided by psychologists. CONCLUSION: The findings underline the importance of a comprehensive psychosocial risk management approach in reducing work-related stress, as lower levels of psychosocial risks are linked to specific psychosocial risk management practices within companies, in particular those pointing to clear responsibilities and coordinated procedures in dealing with psychosocial risks.
Authors: Johannes Siegrist; Dagmar Starke; Tarani Chandola; Isabelle Godin; Michael Marmot; Isabelle Niedhammer; Richard Peter Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Solja T Nyberg; Eleonor I Fransson; Katriina Heikkilä; Lars Alfredsson; Annalisa Casini; Els Clays; Dirk De Bacquer; Nico Dragano; Raimund Erbel; Jane E Ferrie; Mark Hamer; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; France Kittel; Anders Knutsson; Karl-Heinz Ladwig; Thorsten Lunau; Michael G Marmot; Maria Nordin; Reiner Rugulies; Johannes Siegrist; Andrew Steptoe; Peter J M Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Töres Theorell; Eric J Brunner; Archana Singh-Manoux; G David Batty; Mika Kivimäki Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mika Kivimäki; Solja T Nyberg; G David Batty; Eleonor I Fransson; Katriina Heikkilä; Lars Alfredsson; Jakob B Bjorner; Marianne Borritz; Hermann Burr; Annalisa Casini; Els Clays; Dirk De Bacquer; Nico Dragano; Jane E Ferrie; Goedele A Geuskens; Marcel Goldberg; Mark Hamer; Wendela E Hooftman; Irene L Houtman; Matti Joensuu; Markus Jokela; France Kittel; Anders Knutsson; Markku Koskenvuo; Aki Koskinen; Anne Kouvonen; Meena Kumari; Ida E H Madsen; Michael G Marmot; Martin L Nielsen; Maria Nordin; Tuula Oksanen; Jaana Pentti; Reiner Rugulies; Paula Salo; Johannes Siegrist; Archana Singh-Manoux; Sakari B Suominen; Ari Väänänen; Jussi Vahtera; Marianna Virtanen; Peter J M Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Marie Zins; Andrew Steptoe; Töres Theorell Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Töres Theorell; Anne Hammarström; Gunnar Aronsson; Lil Träskman Bendz; Tom Grape; Christer Hogstedt; Ina Marteinsdottir; Ingmar Skoog; Charlotte Hall Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 3.295