| Literature DB >> 28431892 |
M Emrah Şelli1, Anita C Thomas1, David C Wraith2, Andrew C Newby3.
Abstract
Myocarditis, the principal cause of dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure in young adults, is associated with autoimmunity to human cardiac α-myosin (hCAM) and the DR4 allele of human major histocompatibility II (MHCII). We developed an hCAM-induced myocarditis model in human HLA-DR4 transgenic mice that lack all mouse MHCII genes, demonstrating that immunization for 3weeks significantly increased splenic T-cell proliferative responses and titres of IgG1 and IgG2c antibodies, abolished weight gain, provoked cardiac inflammation and significantly impaired cardiac output and fractional shortening, by echocardiography, compared to adjuvant-injected mice. Neither cardiac dilatation nor fibrosis occurred at this time point but prolonging the experiment was associated with mortality. Treatment with mixtures of hCAM derived peptides predicted to have high affinity for DR4 significantly preserved ejection fraction and fractional shortening. Our new humanized mouse model of autoimmune cardiomyopathy should be useful to refine hCAM-derived peptide treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Autoimmunity; Cardiomyopathy; Heart failure; Myocarditis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28431892 PMCID: PMC5466360 DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.04.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol ISSN: 0022-2828 Impact factor: 5.000
Fig. 1Effects of hCAM immunization on immunological measurements, body weight and myocarditis.
(A) Change in thymidine incorporation compared to medium alone controls. Adding hCAM increased spleen cell proliferation after hCAM immunization significantly more than after control immunization (p = 0.022 for 0.2 μg/ml, p = 0.000061 for 2.0 μg/ml and p = 0.0081 for 20 μg/ml hCAM concentration; n = 5). Responses to hCAM were similar to the global T-cell stimulator, ConA (2 μg/ml). (B) Serum IgG1 levels were increased significantly in hCAM compared to control immunized mice (pmax = 0.0008; n = 5). (C) Serum IgG2c levels were also significantly increased as compared to control immunized mice (pmax = 0.02; n = 5). (D) Mice immunized with hCAM group gained no weight, while vehicle-immunized mice gained 2.4 g and were therefore significantly heavier than hCAM-immunized mice after 3 weeks (p = 0.04; n = 5). (E) Haematoxylin and eosin stained histological sections from hearts of the control immunized mice (panel a) were all clear (0/5), while 5/5 of the hearts (p = 0.0079, Fisher's exact test) from hCAM-immunized mice (panel b) were infiltrated with immune cells (blue areas due to concentrated cell nuclei stained with haematoxylin) and had areas of myocyte necrosis in both left and right ventricles. Echocardiographic measurements were performed 3 weeks after immunization. (F) A significant reduction in percentages of ejection fraction (EF; 44 ± 5 vs 77 ± 3%; p = 0.003; n = 5) and fractional shortening (FS; 22 ± 8 vs 48 ± 2%; p = 0.006; n = 5) were observed in hCAM compared to control immunized mice. (G) A significant increase in left ventricle-end-systolic dimension (LVESD) was also observed (2.8 ± 0.4 vs 1.8 ± 0.2 mm; p = 0.039; n = 5) in hCAM compared to control immunized mice, whereas left ventricle end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) was not affected.
Fig. 2Effect of hCAM-derived peptide pre-treatment.
(A) Basal spleen cell proliferation was increased by pool(1) peptide (n = 15) compared to vehicle treatment (n = 15, p = 0.0045) but not with pool(2) (n = 11). Addition of hCAM (20 μg) stimulated splenocyte proliferation to a similar extent after treatment with vehicle, pool(1) or pool(2) peptides. (B) Serum anti-hCAM IgG1 levels were decreased significantly after treatment with pool(2) peptides (n = 11), compared to the vehicle treated group (n = 15), at all dilutions (pmax = 0.036), while no effect was recorded with pool(1) peptides (n = 15). (C) Serum anti-hCAM IgG2c levels were also decreased significantly with only pool(2) peptides at 1/4000 dilution (p = 0.0014; n = 11 vs 15; Wilcoxon test was applied due to non-Gaussian distribution). (D) The area of sections occupied by leukocyte infiltration and myocyte damage was reduced significantly by pool(2) treatment (17.5 vs 29.9%; p = 0.021; n = 11), whereas pool(1) treatment (n = 15) had no significant effect compared to vehicle treated controls (n = 15). (E) Both peptide treatments significantly increased EF (p = 0.011, n = 10 for pool(2); p = 0.041, n = 13 for pool(1)) and FS (p = 0.011, n = 10 for pool(2); p = 0.044, n = 13 for pool(1)) relative to vehicle injected controls (n = 12) 3 weeks after hCAM immunization. (F) LVEDD and LVESD were not significantly affected by peptide treatments.