Literature DB >> 28431609

Benefit-risk perception of natalizumab therapy in neurologists and a large cohort of multiple sclerosis patients.

Christoph Heesen1, Ingo Kleiter2, Sven G Meuth3, Julia Krämer3, Jürgen Kasper4, Sascha Köpke5, Wolfgang Gaissmaier6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab (NAT) is associated with the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Risk stratification algorithms have been developed, however, without detectable reduction of PML incidence.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate to which extent patients and physicians understand and accept risks associated with NAT treatment.
METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study in German MS centers (n=73) among NAT-treated MS patients (n=801) and their neurologists (n=99). Patients included in this study had mean disease duration of 10.2years and a mean NAT treatment duration of 24months.
RESULTS: More than 90% of patients and physicians voted for shared decision making or an informed choice decision making approach. Patients and physicians perceived a similar threat from MS as serious disease and both overestimated treatment benefits from NAT based on trial data. Men perceived MS more severe than women and perception of seriousness increased with age in both groups and in patients as well with increasing disability. Although patients evaluated their PML risk higher, their risk acceptance was significantly higher than of their neurologists. Risk stratification knowledge was good among neurologists and significantly lower among patients.
CONCLUSION: While patients and physicians seem to have realistic risk perception of PML and knowledge of risk stratification concepts, the threat of MS and the perception of treatment benefits may explain the ongoing high acceptance of PML risk.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple sclerosis; Natalizumab; Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; Risk attribution; Risk knowledge; Risk perception; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28431609     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  5 in total

1.  Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Risk Perception in Patients Considering Natalizumab for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Regina Berkovich; Jonathan Eskenazi; Aida Yakupova; Evan Lawrence Riddle
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2021-04-08

2.  The Dilemma of When to Stop Disease-Modifying Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review and Canadian Regional Reimbursement Policies.

Authors:  Katherine B Knox; Aman Saini; Michael C Levin
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

3.  "I Will Respect the Autonomy of My Patient": A Scoping Review of Shared Decision Making in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Anne Christin Rahn; Alessandra Solari; Heleen Beckerman; Richard Nicholas; David Wilkie; Christoph Heesen; Andrea Giordano
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2020-12-28

4.  Training physicians in providing complex information to patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jenny M Nordfalk; Trygve Holmøy; Owen Thomas; Magne Nylenna; Pal Gulbrandsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Patient-based benefit-risk assessment of medicines: development, refinement, and validation of a content search strategy to retrieve relevant studies.

Authors:  Hiba El Masri; Treasure M McGuire; Christine Dalais; Mieke van Driel; Helen Benham; Samantha A Hollingworth
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2022-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.