Literature DB >> 28431129

Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves for Chronic Pain due to Knee Osteoarthritis: Six-Month Outcomes.

Zachary L McCormick1, Marc Korn2, Rajiv Reddy3, Austin Marcolina4, David Dayanim5, Ryan Mattie6, Daniel Cushman7, Meghan Bhave2, Robert J McCarthy2, Dost Khan2, Geeta Nagpal2, David R Walega2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine outcomes of cooled radiofrequency ablation (C-RFA) of the genicular nerves for treatment of chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Academic pain medicine center.
SUBJECTS: Consecutive patients with knee OA and 50% or greater pain relief following genicular nerve blocks who underwent genicular nerve C-RFA.
METHODS: Survey administration six or more months after C-RFA. Pain numeric rating scale (NRS), Medication Quantification Scale III (MQSIII), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) data were collected. Logistic regression was used to identify factors that predicted treatment success.
RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (52 discrete knees) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-five percent (95% confidence interval [CI] = 22-48) of procedures resulted in the combined outcome of 50% or greater reduction in NRS score, reduction of 3.4 or more points in MQSIII score, and PGIC score consistent with "very much improved/improved." Nineteen percent (95% CI = 10-33) of procedures resulted in complete pain relief. Greater duration of pain and greater than 80% pain relief from diagnostic blocks were identified as predictors of treatment success. The accuracy of the model was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.78-0.97, P  <   0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Genicular C-RFA demonstrated a success rate of 35% based on a robust combination of outcome measures, and 19% of procedures resulted in complete relief of pain at a minimum of six months of follow-up. Report of 80% or greater relief from diagnostic blocks and duration of pain of less than five years are associated with high accuracy in predicting treatment success. Further prospective study is needed to optimize the patient selection protocol and success rate of this procedure.
© 2017 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic Pain; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28431129     DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnx069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  16 in total

1.  Peripheral Stimulation of the Saphenous and Superior Lateral Genicular Nerves for Chronic Knee Pain.

Authors:  Jamal Hasoon; Ahish Chitneni; Ivan Urits; Omar Viswanath; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-29

2.  Distribution of sensory nerves supplying the knee joint capsule and implications for genicular blockade and radiofrequency ablation: an anatomical study.

Authors:  Loïc Fonkoué; Catherine Behets; Jean-Éric K Kouassi; Maude Coyette; Christine Detrembleur; Emmanuel Thienpont; Olivier Cornu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Current Concepts and Future Directions of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Knee Pain.

Authors:  Daryl T Goldman; Rachel Piechowiak; Daniel Nissman; Sandeep Bagla; Ari Isaacson
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Review of cooled radiofrequency ablation utilization for the treatment of symptomatic advanced knee arthritis and total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Tran; Felix M Gonzalez
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Effectiveness of the Thermal Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy Under Fluoroscopy in Patients with Non-operative Advanced Stage Knee Osteoarthritis: 1-Year Follow-Up Results.

Authors:  Oğuz Kaya; Ahmet Şenel; Ömer Cihan Batur; Nevzat Gönder; Emre Ergen; Barış Peker
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  Bipolar Radiofrequency Neurotomy of the Genicular Nerves for Chronic Pain Due to Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jaspal R Singh; Susie S Kwon; Frank V Schirripa; Behnum A Habibi; Ethan Rand
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-09-04

7.  Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis compared with intra-articular hyaluronan injections based on trial data.

Authors:  Mehul J Desai; Anthony Bentley; William A Keck
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Genicular Nerve Pulsed Dose Radiofrequency (PDRF) Compared to Intra-Articular and Genicular Nerve PDRF in Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Matteo Luigi Giuseppe Leoni; Michael E Schatman; Laura Demartini; Giuliano Lo Bianco; Gaetano Terranova
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Comparing the effectiveness of ultrasound guided versus blind genicular nerve block on pain, muscle strength with isokinetic device, physical function and quality of life in chronic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Damla Cankurtaran; Ozgur Zeliha Karaahmet; Sadik Yigit Yildiz; Emel Eksioglu; Deniz Dulgeroglu; Ece Unlu
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2020-07-01

10.  Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of the genicular nerves in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis knee pain.

Authors:  Javier Mata; Pedro Valentí; Beatriz Hernández; Bartolome Mir; Jose Luis Aguilar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.