Literature DB >> 28431085

Health status in Europe: comparison of 24 urban areas to the corresponding 10 countries (EURO-URHIS 2).

E M Koster1, R de Gelder1, F Di Nardo2,3, G Williams2, A Harrison2, L P van Buren1, H Lyshol4, L Patterson2, C A Birt5, J Higgerson2,5, P W Achterberg6, A Verma2, E J C van Ameijden1.   

Abstract

Background: : In Europe, over 70% of the population live in urban areas (UAs). Most international comparative health research is done using national level data, as reliable and comparable urban data are often unavailable or difficult to access. This study aims to investigate whether population health is different in UAs compared with their corresponding countries. : Routinely available health-related data were collected by the EURO-URHIS 2 project, for 10 European countries and for 24 UAs within those countries. National and UA level data for 11 health indicators were compared through the calculation of relative difference, and geographical patterns within Europe were investigated using the Mann Whitney U test. Linear regression modelling was used to adjust for population density, gross domestic product and urbanicity. : In general, the urban population in Eastern Europe is less healthy than the Western European urban population. However, people in Eastern Europe have significantly better broad health outcomes in UAs as compared with the corresponding country as a whole, whereas people in Western Europe have generally worse broader health outcomes in UAs. : For most European countries and UAs that were investigated, the national level health status data does not correspond with the health status at UA level. In order to identify health problems in UAs and to provide information for local health policy, health monitoring and international benchmarking should also be conducted at the local level.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28431085     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  3 in total

1.  Socio-Demographic Determinants of Mortality from Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases in Women of Reproductive Age in the Republic of Georgia: Evidence from the National Reproductive Age Mortality Study (2014).

Authors:  Nino Lomia; Nino Berdzuli; Ekaterine Pestvenidze; Lela Sturua; Nino Sharashidze; Maia Kereselidze; Marina Topuridze; Tamar Antelava; Babill Stray-Pedersen; Arne Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2020-02-27

2.  Hearing loss among elderly people and access to hearing aids: a cross-sectional study from a rural area in Germany.

Authors:  Birgit Didczuneit-Sandhop; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Manja Jolie; Josefine Holdys; Michael Hauptmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  European-wide policymaking at the urban level: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Julia Mueller; Lesley Patterson; Matyas Jakab; James Higgerson; Stephanie Steels; Arpana Verma
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.367

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.