| Literature DB >> 28430898 |
N E Foote1, T S Davis2, D W Crowder3, N A Bosque-Pérez1, S D Eigenbrode1.
Abstract
In cereal cropping systems of the Pacific Northwestern United States (PNW), climate change is projected to increase the frequency of drought during summer months, which could increase water stress for crop plants. Yet, it remains uncertain how interactions between herbivore species are affected by drought stress. Here, interactions between two cereal aphids present in PNW cereal systems, Metopolophium festucae (Theobald) subsp. cerealium (a newly invasive species) and Rhopalosiphum padi L. (a naturalized species), were tested relative to wheat water stress. When aphids were confined in leaf cages on wheat, asymmetrical facilitation occurred; per capita fecundity of R. padi was increased by 46% when M. festucae cerealium was also present, compared to when only R. padi was present. Imposed water stress did not influence this interaction. When aphids were confined on whole wheat plants, asymmetrical competition occurred; cocolonization inhibited M. festucae cerealium population growth but did not affect R. padi population growth. Under conditions of plant water stress, however, the inhibitory effect of R. padi on M. festucae cerealium was not observed. We conclude that beneficial effects of cocolonization on R. padi are due to a localized plant response to M. festucae cerealium feeding, and that cocolonization of plants is likely to suppress M. festucae cerealium populations under ample water conditions, but not when plants are water stressed. This suggests that plant responses to water stress alter the outcome of competition between herbivore species, with implications for the structure of pest communities on wheat during periods of drought.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural entomology; community ecology; feeding behavior; insect–plant interaction; wheat
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28430898 PMCID: PMC5452433 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvx071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Entomol ISSN: 0046-225X Impact factor: 2.377
Wheat plant (cultivar Kelse) responses to experimental watering treatments, according to pot size
| Pot size | Variable | Watering treatment | Mean ± SE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 400 cm3 | Predawn leaf water potential (MPa) | 0.1 g H2O/g soil | −0.62 ± 0.14 |
| 0.8 g H2O/g soil | −0.21 ± 0.01 | ||
| Dried aboveground biomass (g) | 0.1 g H2O/g soil | 0.29 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.8 g H2O/g soil | 0.79 ± 0.02 | ||
| 1 L | Predawn leaf water potential (MPa) | 0.1 g H2O/g soil | −0.85 ± 0.11 |
| 0.8 g H2O/g soil | −0.17 ± 0.02 | ||
| Dried aboveground biomass (g) | 0.1 g H2O/g soil | 1.55 ± 0.14 | |
| 0.8 g H2O/g soil | 10.50 ± 0.21 |
ANOVA table summarizing results of experiment testing effects of competition between Metopolophium festucae cerealium and Rhopalosiphum padi feeding on cultivated wheat (Triticum aestivum cultivar Kelse) under two levels of water stress on the response of mean daily per capita fecundity of each aphid species
| Variable | Source | SS | df | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offspring/female/day, | Block | 0.010 | 2 | – | – |
| Aphid treatment | 0.185 | 1 | 3.394 | 0.072 | |
| Water treatment | 0.061 | 1 | 1.114 | 0.297 | |
| Interaction | 0.090 | 1 | 1.656 | 0.205 | |
| Error | 2.234 | 39 | |||
| Offspring/female/day, | Block | 0.446 | 2 | – | – |
| Aphid treatment | 7.652 | 1 | 13.419 | <0.001 | |
| Water treatment | 0.340 | 1 | 0.598 | 0.444 | |
| Interaction | 0.061 | 1 | 0.107 | 0.745 | |
| Error | 22.239 | 39 |
Mean daily per capita fecundity (number of offspring per female) for Metopolophium festucae cerealium and Rhopalosiphum padi feeding on cultivated wheat (Triticum aestivum cultivar Kelse) under two levels of water stress
| Aphid species | Water treatment | Aphid treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heterospecific (both species present) | Conspecific (single species) | ||
| 0.1 g H2O/g soil | 0.436 ± 0.074 | 0.651 ± 0.064 | |
| 0.8 g H2O/g soil | 0.597 ± 0.067 | 0.635 ± 0.067 | |
| 0.1 g H2O/g soil | 1.739 ± 0.241a | 0.837 ± 0.217b | |
| 0.8 g H2O/g soil | 1.839 ± 0.217a | 1.086 ± 0.228ab | |
Values with letters denote Tukey’s HSD test on the aphid treatment × water treatment interaction (among the four values for each species).
The effect of previous exposure to feeding (7-d exposure period) by either Rhopalosiphum padi or Metopolophium festucae cerealium on population growth parameters of R. padi
| Variable | Feeding treatment | |
|---|---|---|
| Previous feeding by | Previous feeding by | |
| Basic reproductive rate ( | 26.3 ± 1.17a | 41.02 ± 0.93b |
| Generation time ( | 15.31 ± 0.69 | 14.55 ± 0.55 |
| Intrinsic rate of growth ( | 0.22 ± 0.01a | 0.26 ± 0.01b |
Values followed by letters indicate Tukey’s HSD test.
Basic reproductive rate (R) refers to average number of offspring produced per foundress.
Generation time (T) represents average time (in days) between two consecutive generations.
Intrinsic growth rate (r) is the theoretical maximum population growth rate in the absence of density-dependent effects, where (dN/dt)(1/N) = r.
ANOVA table summarizing repeat-measure statistical model comparing previous exposure to feeding (7-d exposure period) by either Rhopalosiphum padi or Metopolophium festucae cerealium on age-specific fecundity (L) of R. padi
| Source | SS | df | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block | 0.323 | 1 | – | – |
| Time (day) | 1606.340 | 11 | – | – |
| Feeding treatment | 289.874 | 12 | 483.295 | <0.0001 |
| Error | 6.121 | 125 | – | – |
Fig. 1.Mean age-specific fecundity of Rhopalosiphum padi foundresses feeding on leaf tissue previously fed on by either Metopolophium festucae cerealium (circles, dashed line) or R. padi (triangles, solid line); bars show standard deviations.
Mean population sizes (± SE) of Rhopalosiphum padi and Metopolophium festucae cerealium after 21 d of unrestricted feeding on whole wheat plants at two levels of water stress
| Aphid species | Water treatment | Aphid species treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Both species | ||||
| 0.1 g H2O/g soil | 148 ± 146 | 161 ± 139 | ||
| 0.8 g H2O/g soil | 493 ± 125 | 579 ± 125 | ||
| 0.1 g H2O/g soil | 171 ± 24 | 49 ± 22 | ||
| 0.8 g H2O/g soil | 153 ± 20 | 110 ± 20 | ||