Literature DB >> 28430756

Does pregnancy influence melanoma prognosis? A meta-analysis.

Athanassios Kyrgidis1, Aimilios Lallas, Elvira Moscarella, Caterina Longo, Roberto Alfano, Giuseppe Argenziano.   

Abstract

The literature has not been able to conclude whether pregnancy influences the prognosis of melanoma. The aim of this study was to explore the prognosis of melanoma diagnosed during pregnancy or post partum [pregnancy-associated melanoma (PAM)] compared with melanoma in female patients who were not pregnant. We systematically searched for studies of female patients with melanoma that reported outcomes related to survival. Fifteen eligible studies were found. Overall, PAM was associated with a 17% higher mortality compared with melanoma diagnosed in female patients who were not pregnant (hazard ratio=1.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.33, P=0.02). The heterogeneity associated with this test was moderate (P=0.07; I=38%). PAM was also associated with a 50% higher recurrence rate compared with melanoma not associated with pregnancy (hazard ratio=1.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-1.90, P<0.001). The heterogeneity associated with this test was low (P=0.69; I=0%). A limitation of this meta-analysis is the definition of PAM, which is not unanimous among the studies included. Our results indicate that PAM is associated with a worse prognosis than melanoma not related to pregnancy, both in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. On the basis of our data, we anticipate that the survival difference we report here will be further amplified with the addition of future well-carried out studies. We suggest that detection of PAM requires particular awareness by healthcare professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28430756     DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  4 in total

1.  Melanoma in women of childbearing age and in pregnancy in California, 1994-2015: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  M Kiuru; Q Li; G Zhu; J R Terrell; K Beroukhim; E Maverakis; T H M Keegan
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 9.228

2.  Pregnancy and Melanoma: Recommendations for Clinical Scenarios.

Authors:  Juliana Berk-Krauss; Tracey N Liebman; Jennifer A Stein
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  MUG Mel3 Cell Lines Reflect Heterogeneity in Melanoma and Represent a Robust Model for Melanoma in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Silke Schrom; Thomas Hebesberger; Stefanie Angela Wallner; Ines Anders; Erika Richtig; Waltraud Brandl; Birgit Hirschmugl; Mariangela Garofalo; Claudia Bernecker; Peter Schlenke; Karl Kashofer; Christian Wadsack; Ariane Aigelsreiter; Ellen Heitzer; Sabrina Riedl; Dagmar Zweytick; Nadine Kretschmer; Georg Richtig; Beate Rinner
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Melanoma in pregnancy: certainties unborn.

Authors:  Enrico Zelin; Claudio Conforti; Roberta Giuffrida; Teresa Deinlein; Nicola di Meo; Iris Zalaudek
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2020-07-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.