Literature DB >> 28430723

Colpocleisis: A Survey of Current Practice Patterns.

Keisha Jones1, Gary Wang, Robert Romano, Peter St Marie, Oz Harmanli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no standard treatment guidelines for colpocleisis. Clinical practice varies widely for this safe and effective procedure.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current practice patterns in the United States among surgeons who perform colpocleisis.
METHODS: A 27-item anonymous Web-based survey was sent to all practicing physicians affiliated with the American Urogynecologic Society. It consisted of questions regarding the demographic background of the physicians and their current practice as it relates to colpocleisis.
RESULTS: Of the 1422 physicians contacted, 322 responded (23%) to the questionnaire. Slightly more than half were female with an average time of 15 years in practice. The majority of respondents (79%) were urogynecologists. Most surgeons chose colpocleisis for its high success rate, short operating time, and low risk of complications. Approximately half of the providers performed both LeFort and total colpocleisis. Only 18% performed a routine hysterectomy at the time of surgery. Routine preoperative endometrial evaluation was preferred by 68% of the respondents, with 81% utilizing a transvaginal ultrasound first. Almost all providers would perform concomitant incontinence procedures, with 54% requiring a positive cough stress test and normal postvoid residual.
CONCLUSIONS: There is variation in the current practice of colpocleisis in the United States. LeFort colpocleisis is most commonly performed, and routine hysterectomy is uncommon. Two thirds of surgeons evaluate the endometrium prior to surgery. Concomitant anti-incontinence procedures appear to be standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28430723      PMCID: PMC6488017          DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  3 in total

1.  The underutilization of obliterative and constrictive surgery in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Tony Bazi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Risk factors predicting the loss of functional independence after obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Logan Blankenship; Meadow M Good; Carmen Smotherman; Shiva Gautam; Ruchira Singh
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Sudden Cardiac Death in Famous Athletes, Lessons Learned, Heterogeneity in Expert Recommendations and Pitfalls of Contemporary Screening Strategies.

Authors:  Trenton Bickel; Prasad Gunasekaran; Ghulam Murtaza; Rakesh Gopinathannair; Sampath Gunda; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2019-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.