Literature DB >> 28430555

Beyond Wires and Seeds: Reflector-guided Breast Lesion Localization and Excision.

Victoria L Mango1, Ralph T Wynn1, Sheldon Feldman1, Lauren Friedlander1, Elise Desperito1, Sejal N Patel1, Ameer Gomberawalla1, Richard Ha1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate outcomes of Savi Scout (Cianna Medical, Aliso Viejo, Calif) reflector-guided localization and excision of breast lesions by analyzing reflector placement, localization, and removal, along with target excision and rates of repeat excision (referred to as re-excision). Materials and Methods A single-institution retrospective review of 100 women who underwent breast lesion localization and excision by using the Savi Scout surgical guidance system from June 2015 to May 2016 was performed. By using image guidance 0-8 days before surgery, 123 nonradioactive, infrared-activated, electromagnetic wave reflectors were percutaneously inserted adjacent to or within 111 breast targets. Twenty patients had two or three reflectors placed for bracketing or for localizing multiple lesions, and when ipsilateral, they were placed as close as 2.6 cm apart. Target and reflector were localized intraoperatively by one of two breast surgeons who used a handpiece that emitted infrared light and electromagnetic waves. Radiographs of the specimen and pathologic analysis helped verify target and reflector removal. Target to reflector distance was measured on the mammogram and radiograph of the specimen, and reflector depth was measured on the mammogram. Pathologic analysis was reviewed. Re-excision rates and complications were recorded. By using statistics software, descriptive statistics were generated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated. Results By using sonographic (40 of 123; 32.5%; 95% CI: 24.9%, 41.2%) or mammographic (83 of 123; 67.5%; 95% CI: 58.8% 75.1%) guidance, 123 (100%; 95% CI: 96.4%, 100%) reflectors were placed. Mean mammographic target to reflector distance was 0.3 cm. All 123 (100%; 95% CI: 96.4%, 100%) targets and reflectors were excised. Pathologic analysis yielded 54 of 110 malignancies (49.1%; 95% CI: 39.9%, 58.3%; average, 1.0 cm; range, 0.1-5 cm), 32 high-risk lesions (29.1%; 95% CI: 21.4%, 38.2%), and 24 benign lesions (21.8%; 95% CI: 115.1%, 30.4%). Four of 54 malignant cases (7.4%; 95% CI: 2.4%, 18.1%) demonstrated margins positive for cancer that required re-excision. Five of 110 radiographs of the specimen (4.5%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 10.4%) demonstrated increased distance between the target and reflector distance of greater than 1.0 cm (range, 1.1-2.6 cm) compared with postprocedure mammogram the day of placement, three of five were associated with hematomas, two of five migrated without identifiable cause. No related postoperative complications were identified. Conclusion Savi Scout is an accurate, reliable method to localize and excise breast lesions with acceptable margin positivity and re-excision rates. Bracketing is possible with reflectors as close as 2.6 cm. Savi Scout overcomes many limitations of other localization methods, which warrants further study. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28430555     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization.

Authors:  Ellen Cheang; Richard Ha; Cynthia M Thornton; Victoria L Mango
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Impact of deformation on a supine-positioned image-guided breast surgery approach.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Jon S Heiselman; Ma Luo; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 3.  Image-Guided Localization Techniques for Surgical Excision of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: An Overview of Current Literature and Our Experience with Preoperative Skin Tattoo.

Authors:  Gianluca Franceschini; Elena Jane Mason; Cristina Grippo; Sabatino D'Archi; Anna D'Angelo; Lorenzo Scardina; Alejandro Martin Sanchez; Marco Conti; Charlotte Trombadori; Daniela Andreina Terribile; Alba Di Leone; Beatrice Carnassale; Paolo Belli; Riccardo Manfredi; Riccardo Masetti
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Reflector-Guided Localisation of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: A Prospective Evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT® System.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Iham Kasem; Michael J Michell; Tamara Suaris; David Evans; Anmol Malhotra; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Safety and feasibility of breast lesion localization using magnetic seeds (Magseed): a multi-centre, open-label cohort study.

Authors:  James R Harvey; Yit Lim; John Murphy; Miles Howe; Julie Morris; Amit Goyal; Anthony J Maxwell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Evaluation of the nonradioactive inducible magnetic seed system Magseed for preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions - initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Karolina Pieszko; Mateusz Wichtowski; Marcin Cieciorowski; Robert Jamont; Dawid Murawa
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2020-03-13

7.  Results of a phase I, non-randomized study evaluating a Magnetic Occult Lesion Localization Instrument (MOLLI) for excision of non-palpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Nicole Look Hong; Frances C Wright; Mark Semple; Alexandru M Nicolae; Ananth Ravi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.872

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.