Literature DB >> 28430045

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Changes in the Last Decade: Differences in Morbidity and Weight Loss.

Andrea Balla1, Silvia Quaresima1, Frida Leonetti2, Emanuela Paone1, Marco Brunori3, Teresa Messina1, Ardit Seitaj1, Alessandro M Paganini1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aim is to report the learning curve and standardization process of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG), describing the evolution in surgical technique and patient management in the authors' experiences.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were divided in three Groups (A, B, and C), based on bougie size and technical details, and included 36, 46, and 45 patients, respectively.
RESULTS: Mean operative time in Groups A, B, and C was 201.5, 150.8, and 172 minutes, respectively. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 1 Group A case. Eleven postoperative complications (8.6%) were observed (1 Group A, 8 Group B, 2 and Group C). Mean hospital stay in Groups A, B, and C, was 7.1, 6.9, and 3.1 days, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 69.7 months (Group A), 33.3 months (Group B), and 14.8 months (Group C), mean postoperative body mass index is 32.6, 28.1, and 31.5 kg/m2, respectively. Percentage estimated body mass index loss (%EBMIL) was 74.8% for Group A, 85.7% for Group B, and 68.1% for Group C.
CONCLUSIONS: LSG is a safe and effective procedure. In the postoperative course, meticulous alertness to early warning signs of sepsis and aggressive patient management are mandatory to prevent mortality. The use of a larger bougie size was associated with weight regain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bariatric surgery; general surgical unit; laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; learning curve; obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28430045     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  6 in total

Review 1.  Imaging following bariatric surgery: roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Ryan D Clayton; Laura R Carucci
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Andrea Balla; Diletta Corallino; Silvia Quaresima; Livia Palmieri; Francesca Meoli; Ingrid Cordova Herencia; Alessandro M Paganini
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss: A PCORnet Cohort Study.

Authors:  David Arterburn; Robert Wellman; Ana Emiliano; Steven R Smith; Andrew O Odegaard; Sameer Murali; Neely Williams; Karen J Coleman; Anita Courcoulas; R Yates Coley; Jane Anau; Roy Pardee; Sengwee Toh; Cheri Janning; Andrea Cook; Jessica Sturtevant; Casie Horgan; Kathleen M McTigue
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Hiatoplasty with Crura Buttressing versus Hiatoplasty Alone during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Andrea Balla; Silvia Quaresima; Pietro Ursi; Ardit Seitaj; Livia Palmieri; Danilo Badiali; Alessandro M Paganini
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 5.  Revisional Surgeries of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Siyuan Li; Siqi Jiao; Siwei Zhang; Jiangjiao Zhou
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Promising effects of 33 to 36 Fr. bougie calibration for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Po-Chih Chang; Kai-Hua Chen; Hong-Jie Jhou; Po-Huang Chen; Chih-Kun Huang; Cho-Hao Lee; Ting-Wei Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.