Literature DB >> 28429498

Separate neural systems for behavioral change and for emotional responses to failure during behavioral inhibition.

Wanlu Deng1,2, Edmund T Rolls2,3, Xiaoxi Ji4, Trevor W Robbins5, Tobias Banaschewski6, Arun L W Bokde7, Uli Bromberg8, Christian Buechel8, Sylvane Desrivières9, Patricia Conrod10,11, Herta Flor12, Vincent Frouin13, Juergen Gallinat14, Hugh Garavan15, Penny Gowland16, Andreas Heinz17, Bernd Ittermann18, Jean-Luc Martinot19, Herve Lemaitre20,21, Frauke Nees6, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos13, Luise Poustka6,22, Michael N Smolka23, Henrik Walter17, Robert Whelan24, Gunter Schumann9, Jianfeng Feng1,2,4.   

Abstract

To analyze the involvement of different brain regions in behavioral inhibition and impulsiveness, differences in activation were investigated in fMRI data from a response inhibition task, the stop-signal task, in 1709 participants. First, areas activated more in stop-success (SS) than stop-failure (SF) included the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) extending into the inferior frontal gyrus (ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, BA 47/12), and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Second, the anterior cingulate and anterior insula (AI) were activated more on failure trials, specifically in SF versus SS. The interaction between brain region and SS versus SF activations was significant (P = 5.6 * 10-8 ). The results provide new evidence from this "big data" investigation consistent with the hypotheses that the lateral OFC is involved in the stop-related processing that inhibits the action; that the DLPFC is involved in attentional processes that influence task performance; and that the AI and anterior cingulate are involved in emotional processes when failure occurs. The investigation thus emphasizes the role of the human lateral OFC BA 47/12 in changing behavior, and inhibiting behavior when necessary. A very similar area in BA47/12 is involved in changing behavior when an expected reward is not obtained, and has been shown to have high functional connectivity in depression. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3527-3537, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cingulate cortex; depression; impulsive behavior; inhibition; insula; orbitofrontal cortex

Year:  2017        PMID: 28429498      PMCID: PMC6866896          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  56 in total

1.  Keeping the body in mind: insula functional organization and functional connectivity integrate interoceptive, exteroceptive, and emotional awareness.

Authors:  W Kyle Simmons; Jason A Avery; Joel C Barcalow; Jerzy Bodurka; Wayne C Drevets; Patrick Bellgowan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Implementation of a new parcellation of the orbitofrontal cortex in the automated anatomical labeling atlas.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls; Marc Joliot; Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Role for cingulate motor area cells in voluntary movement selection based on reward.

Authors:  K Shima; J Tanji
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Visceral influences on brain and behavior.

Authors:  Hugo D Critchley; Neil A Harrison
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  The development of social cognition in adolescence: An integrated perspective.

Authors:  Emma J Kilford; Emily Garrett; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Reward-related reversal learning after surgical excisions in orbito-frontal or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in humans.

Authors:  J Hornak; J O'Doherty; J Bramham; E T Rolls; R G Morris; P R Bullock; C E Polkey
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jeng-Ren Duann; Jaime S Ide; Xi Luo; Chiang-shan Ray Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Frontal cortex and reward-guided learning and decision-making.

Authors:  Matthew F S Rushworth; Maryann P Noonan; Erie D Boorman; Mark E Walton; Timothy E Behrens
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The prefrontal cortex achieves inhibitory control by facilitating subcortical motor pathway connectivity.

Authors:  Charlotte L Rae; Laura E Hughes; Michael C Anderson; James B Rowe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Is there "one" DLPFC in cognitive action control? Evidence for heterogeneity from co-activation-based parcellation.

Authors:  Edna C Cieslik; Karl Zilles; Svenja Caspers; Christian Roski; Tanja S Kellermann; Oliver Jakobs; Robert Langner; Angela R Laird; Peter T Fox; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Specializations for reward-guided decision-making in the primate ventral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Murray; Peter H Rudebeck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The role of dopaminergic and serotonergic transmission in the processing of primary and monetary reward.

Authors:  Arne Møller; Valerie Voon; Casper Schmidt; Nikolina Skandali; Carsten Gleesborg; Timo L Kvamme; Hema Schmidt; Kim Frisch
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Early Childhood Adverse Experiences, Inferior Frontal Gyrus Connectivity, and the Trajectory of Externalizing Psychopathology.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Andy C Belden; Rebecca Tillman; Diana Whalen; Joan L Luby
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  Functional connectivity of the right inferior frontal gyrus and orbitofrontal cortex in depression.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls; Wei Cheng; Jingnan Du; Dongtao Wei; Jiang Qiu; Dan Dai; Qunjie Zhou; Peng Xie; Jianfeng Feng
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Hypothalamic response to cocaine cues and cocaine addiction severity.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Simon Zhornitsky; Gustavo A Angarita; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.280

6.  Identification and Validation of Distinct Latent Neurodevelopmental Profiles in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study.

Authors:  Sarah D Lichenstein; Corey Roos; Robert Kohler; Brian Kiluk; Kathleen M Carroll; Patrick D Worhunsky; Katie Witkiewitz; Sarah W Yip
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-03-09

7.  Decreased brain connectivity in smoking contrasts with increased connectivity in drinking.

Authors:  Wei Cheng; Edmund T Rolls; Trevor W Robbins; Weikang Gong; Zhaowen Liu; Wujun Lv; Jingnan Du; Hongkai Wen; Liang Ma; Erin Burke Quinlan; Hugh Garavan; Eric Artiges; Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos; Michael N Smolka; Gunter Schumann; Keith Kendrick; Jianfeng Feng
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Understanding Brain Mechanisms of Reactive Aggression.

Authors:  Katja Bertsch; Julian Florange; Sabine C Herpertz
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Cortical thickness distinguishes between major depression and schizophrenia in adolescents.

Authors:  Zheyi Zhou; Kangcheng Wang; Jinxiang Tang; Dongtao Wei; Li Song; Yadong Peng; Yixiao Fu; Jiang Qiu
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Disruption of the structural and functional connectivity of the frontoparietal network underlies symptomatic anxiety in late-life depression.

Authors:  Hui Li; Xiao Lin; Lin Liu; Sizhen Su; Ximei Zhu; Yongbo Zheng; Weizhen Huang; Jianyu Que; Le Shi; Yanping Bao; Lin Lu; Jiahui Deng; Xinyu Sun
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.