Literature DB >> 28429477

The emerging role of maxillofacial radiology in the diagnosis and management of patients with complex periodontitis.

William C Scarfe, Bruno Azevedo, Lucas R Pinheiro, Menik Priaminiarti, Marcelo A O Sales.   

Abstract

Contemporary periodontal therapy has evolved to become more interdisciplinary and increasingly involves more complex treatments, including bone and soft-tissue regenerative procedures. Therapeutic options require an imaging modality or combination of techniques that are capable of providing a diagnostic osseous baseline and facilitating quantification of smaller increments of bony change, both loss and additive, which are comparable over time. Intra-oral and panoramic radiography are the modalities most commonly used to identify the location, quantify the amount and the pattern of alveolar bone loss and determine response to therapy. Cone-beam computed tomography imaging offers specific advantages for periodontal diagnosis in that three-dimensional images of dental and alveolar bone structures can be rendered with accuracy. Cone-beam computed tomography has been shown to be clinically efficacious in demonstrating localized defects, such as furcation involvement and intrabony vertical and buccal/lingual defects, and in assessing the effects of regenerative therapy. In these situations, limited-field-of-view, high-resolution protocols are indicated.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28429477     DOI: 10.1111/prd.12193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Periodontol 2000        ISSN: 0906-6713            Impact factor:   7.589


  7 in total

1.  [Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement].

Authors:  Hai-Yan Zhao; Nan Wang; Yi Ding; Hai-Ying Zheng; Jun-Rong Qian
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-01

2.  Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with bitewing radiography for detection of periodontal bone loss and assessment of effects of different voxel resolutions: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hayriye Cetmili; Melek Tassoker; Sevgi Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Grey value contrast sensitivity of dental practitioners in function of luminance and age.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jacquet; Roberto G Cleymaet; Peter Bottenberg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Digital three-dimensional visualization of intrabony periodontal defects for regenerative surgical treatment planning.

Authors:  Daniel Palkovics; Francesco Guido Mangano; Katalin Nagy; Peter Windisch
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Prevalence of periodontitis and alveolar bone loss in a patient population at Harvard School of Dental Medicine.

Authors:  Mohammad F Helmi; Hui Huang; J Max Goodson; Hatice Hasturk; Mary Tavares; Zuhair S Natto
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 6.  Guidelines for oral and maxillofacial imaging: COVID-19 considerations.

Authors:  David S MacDonald; Dan C Colosi; Muralidhar Mupparapu; Vandana Kumar; Werner H Shintaku; Mansur Ahmad
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-10-26

7.  Reliability assessment between clinical attachment loss and alveolar bone level in dental radiographs.

Authors:  Fathima Fazrina Farook; Hussah Alodwene; Rasha Alharbi; Meral Alyami; Amjad Alshahrani; Duaa Almohammadi; Bothinah Alnasyan; Wael Aboelmaaty
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-09-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.