Literature DB >> 28429077

[Implementation of the German S3 guidelines on dementia in clinical practice: wish or reality?]

H Lohmann1, F Kulessa2,3, H Holling3, A Johnen2, S Reul2, G Lueg2, T Duning2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Published in 2009, the German S3 guidelines on dementia define a milestone in quality improvement of the diagnostics and treatment of dementia. In clinical practice patients suffering from dementia are primarily treated by physicians in private practice; therefore, this study examined how the guidelines are implemented in outpatient clinical settings. Furthermore, it aimed at the identification of behavioral determinants that govern the actual diagnostic and therapeutic approach in clinical practice.
METHODS: Physicians involved in the primary care of dementia patients were asked to participate in a nationwide internet survey. The questionnaire covered aspects on the diagnostic and therapeutic care of dementia patients as recommended by the S3 guidelines. Behavioral determinants of the implementation of the guidelines (e. g. treatment decisions) were derived from an established psychological prediction model.
RESULTS: Out of a total of 2755 physicians contacted, the data of 225 participants could be used in this study. The diagnostic recommendations of the S3 guidelines were implemented in satisfactory measures (e.g. combined cognitive screening in at least 68%, cerebral neuroimaging in at least 93% and specific laboratory diagnostics in at least 27% of cases); however, only two thirds of the patients with indications for a guideline-conform therapy were treated in accordance with the S3 guidelines. There was a substantial prescription of non-recommended drugs and a notable long-term use of antipsychotic drugs (prescription by at least 14% of non-neurological medical specialists and by 8% of neurologists and psychiatrists). When considering the behavioral determinants in the implementation of the guidelines, normative assumptions ("my colleagues and patients expect me to comply with the guidelines") surprisingly had the highest impact, which was then followed by attitudes towards the behavior ("utilization of the guidelines improves diagnostics and therapy").
CONCLUSION: The German S3 guidelines on dementia were satisfactorily implemented in outpatient clinical practice; however, deficits existed in the frequency of the pharmaceutical treatment of patients with indications for therapy, the prescription of non-recommended drugs and the relatively common use of permanent neuroleptic medications. Interestingly, the motivation for implementation of the guidelines was not primarily influenced by the physicians' personal convictions but mainly stimulated by the expectations of others.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimers dementia; Dementia diagnostics; S3 guidelines dementia; Theory of planned behavior

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28429077     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-017-0325-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  34 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Practice nurses' intentions to use clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Suezann Puffer; Arash Rashidian
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  [Attitudes toward dementia management in Germany - Data from the IMPACT survey (Important Perspectives on Alzheimer's Care and Treatment)].

Authors:  L Hausner; M Damian; K Jekel; M Richter; L Frölich
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 0.628

4.  [Improving general practitioners guided dementia care: the pilot project start-modem in Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany].

Authors:  N Laux; H Melchinger; A Scheurich; I Schermuly; I Germann; S Hilgert; K Lieb; A Fellgiebel
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 0.628

5.  [Memory clinics in community mental health care].

Authors:  Michel Marpert; Martin Roser
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2011-05-05

6.  Utility of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior for predicting physician behavior: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  S G Millstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Persistence with antipsychotics in dementia patients in Germany
.

Authors:  Anke Booker; Louis Jacob; Jens Bohlken; Michael Rapp; Karel Kostev
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.366

8.  [Non-cognitive symptoms and psychopharmacological treatment in demented nursing home residents].

Authors:  U Seidl; U Lueken; L Völker; S Re; S Becker; A Kruse; J Schröder
Journal:  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 0.752

9.  [Dementia guidelines: what should come to general practice--an interdisciplinary consensus of physicians in private practice].

Authors:  M W Riepe; A Fellgiebel
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 0.628

10.  General practitioners' intentions and prescribing for asthma: using the theory of planned behavior to explain guideline implementation.

Authors:  Arash Rashidian; Ian Russell
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2012-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Memory clinics in Germany-structural requirements and areas of responsibility].

Authors:  Lucrezia Hausner; Lutz Frölich; Christine A F von Arnim; Jens Bohlken; Richard Dodel; Markus Otto; Michael Rapp; Jörg Schulz; Tilmann Supprian; M Axel Wollmer; Frank Jessen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 1.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.