Literature DB >> 28428727

Improved methods for evaluating the environmental impact of nanoparticle synthesis†.

Bradley T Reid1, Scott M Reed1.   

Abstract

With the market for products containing nanoparticles growing, improvements in the efficiency of nanoparticle synthesis are poised to have significant positive economic and environmental impacts. While many metrics have been designed for measuring the efficiency of small molecule synthesis, the use of these metrics for evaluating nanoparticle preparation has not been optimized. Here a critical evaluation of various green chemistry metrics is provided as they are applied to a common set of nanoparticle synthetic methods. The effect of the nanoparticle polydispersity on the relative greenness of different synthetic methods is also examined. Using metrics modified to account for polydispersity, a case study of gold nanoparticle syntheses is provided and three different methods of preparing monodisperse gold nanoparticles are compared. Interestingly, not all of the metrics provide the same rankings for the synthetic methods. And when polydispersity is ignored, the metrics provide a different rank order of the methods, highlighting the importance of clearly defining the desired nanoparticle size range to avoid underestimating the environmental impact.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28428727      PMCID: PMC5393458          DOI: 10.1039/C6GC00383D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Green Chem        ISSN: 1463-9262            Impact factor:   10.182


  10 in total

1.  Luminescent carbon nanodots: emergent nanolights.

Authors:  Sheila N Baker; Gary A Baker
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 2.  Self-assembled monolayers of thiolates on metals as a form of nanotechnology.

Authors:  J Christopher Love; Lara A Estroff; Jennah K Kriebel; Ralph G Nuzzo; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Toward greener nanosynthesis.

Authors:  Jennifer A Dahl; Bettye L S Maddux; James E Hutchison
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Nanoparticle imaging. Electron microscopy of gold nanoparticles at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Maia Azubel; Jaakko Koivisto; Sami Malola; David Bushnell; Greg L Hura; Ai Leen Koh; Hironori Tsunoyama; Tatsuya Tsukuda; Mika Pettersson; Hannu Häkkinen; Roger D Kornberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Metal nanoparticles via the atom-economy green approach.

Authors:  Suresh Babu Kalidindi; Udishnu Sanyal; Balaji R Jagirdar
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 5.165

6.  Controlling nanoparticles with atomic precision: the case of Au144(SCH2CH2Ph)60.

Authors:  Huifeng Qian; Rongchao Jin
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  Reaction of Au(55)(PPh(3))(12)Cl(6) with thiols yields thiolate monolayer protected Au(75) clusters.

Authors:  Ramjee Balasubramanian; Rui Guo; Allan J Mills; Royce W Murray
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Unexpected reactivity of Au25(SCH2CH2Ph)18 nanoclusters with salts.

Authors:  Manzhou Zhu; Gerentt Chan; Huifeng Qian; Rongchao Jin
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  STEM Electron Diffraction and High Resolution Images Used in the Determination of the Crystal Structure of Au144(SR)60 Cluster.

Authors:  Daniel Bahena; Nabraj Bhattarai; Ulises Santiago; Alfredo Tlahuice; Arturo Ponce; Stephan B H Bach; Bokwon Yoon; Robert L Whetten; Uzi Landman; Miguel Jose-Yacaman
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.475

Review 10.  Implementation of alternative test strategies for the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  A E Nel
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 8.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.