Literature DB >> 28428321

Sulfonylureas and the Risks of Cardiovascular Events and Death: A Methodological Meta-Regression Analysis of the Observational Studies.

Laurent Azoulay1,2,3, Samy Suissa4,2.   

Abstract

Recent randomized trials have compared the newer antidiabetic agents to treatments involving sulfonylureas, drugs associated with increased cardiovascular risks and mortality in some observational studies with conflicting results. We reviewed the methodology of these observational studies by searching MEDLINE from inception to December 2015 for all studies of the association between sulfonylureas and cardiovascular events or mortality. Each study was appraised with respect to the comparator, the outcome, and study design-related sources of bias. A meta-regression analysis was used to evaluate heterogeneity. A total of 19 studies were identified, of which six had no major design-related biases. Sulfonylureas were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in five of these studies (relative risks 1.16-1.55). Overall, the 19 studies resulted in 36 relative risks as some studies assessed multiple outcomes or comparators. Of the 36 analyses, metformin was the comparator in 27 (75%) and death was the outcome in 24 (67%). The relative risk was higher by 13% when the comparator was metformin, by 20% when death was the outcome, and by 7% when the studies had design-related biases. The lowest predicted relative risk was for studies with no major bias, comparator other than metformin, and cardiovascular outcome (1.06 [95% CI 0.92-1.23]), whereas the highest was for studies with bias, metformin comparator, and mortality outcome (1.53 [95% CI 1.43-1.65]). In summary, sulfonylureas were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in the majority of studies with no major design-related biases. Among studies with important biases, the association varied significantly with respect to the comparator, the outcome, and the type of bias. With the introduction of new antidiabetic drugs, the use of appropriate design and analytical tools will provide their more accurate cardiovascular safety assessment in the real-world setting.
© 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28428321     DOI: 10.2337/dc16-1943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  39 in total

Review 1.  Glucose-Lowering Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Salvatore Carbone; Dave L Dixon; Leo F Buckley; Antonio Abbate
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Using Real-World Data to Predict Findings of an Ongoing Phase IV Cardiovascular Outcome Trial: Cardiovascular Safety of Linagliptin Versus Glimepiride.

Authors:  Elisabetta Patorno; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Chandrasekar Gopalakrishnan; David Martin; Jessica M Franklin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Precision medicine in KCNJ11 permanent neonatal diabetes.

Authors:  Siri Atma W Greeley; Lisa R Letourneau; Louis H Philipson
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 32.069

4.  Cardiovascular safety signals with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: A disproportionality analysis among high-risk patients.

Authors:  Sheriza N Baksh; Mara McAdams-DeMarco; Jodi B Segal; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 5.  Pharmacological Prevention of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus: Established and Emerging Agents.

Authors:  David R Saxon; Neda Rasouli; Robert H Eckel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Is polypharmacy beneficial or detrimental for older adults with cardiometabolic multimorbidity? Pooled analysis of studies from Hong Kong and Europe.

Authors:  Johnny T K Cheung; Ruby Yu; Jean Woo
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Cardiovascular safety of linagliptin compared with other oral glucose-lowering agents in patients with type 2 diabetes: A sequential monitoring programme in routine care.

Authors:  Elisabetta Patorno; Chandrasekar Gopalakrishnan; Kimberly G Brodovicz; Andrea Meyers; Dorothee B Bartels; Jun Liu; Martin Kulldorff; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 8.  Genetics Insights in the Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Mark O Goodarzi; Jerome I Rotter
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Association of Second-line Antidiabetic Medications With Cardiovascular Events Among Insured Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Matthew J O'Brien; Susan L Karam; Amisha Wallia; Raymond H Kang; Andrew J Cooper; Nicola Lancki; Margaret R Moran; David T Liss; Theodore A Prospect; Ronald T Ackermann
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07

Review 10.  The Infamous, Famous Sulfonylureas and Cardiovascular Safety: Much Ado About Nothing?

Authors:  Laurentiu M Pop; Ildiko Lingvay
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.