Literature DB >> 28428123

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in IVF.

L Larue1, G Keromnes2, A Massari2, C Roche2, J Moulin2, H Gronier2, D Bouret3, N G Cassuto3, J P Ayel2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer is a technique that can be used routinely, whether it improves IVF outcomes and whether it makes difficult transfers easier and more successful. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Non-randomized retrospective study conducted between 2012 and 2016 in the fertility center of the Diaconesses-Croix St-Simon hospital group. The outcomes of 3910 transfers, performed by 5 senior operators, under transabdominal ultrasound guidance are compared with those of 800 transfers, performed by 1 senior operator under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. The criteria studied are the feasibility of the technique and the percentage of pregnancies per transfer in the two populations described, as well as in the difficult and very difficult transfer populations.
RESULTS: All the transfers were feasible under transvaginal ultrasound guidance without the use of forceps or additional instruments. The percentage of pregnancies per transfer is significantly increased, when the transfer is performed under transvaginal ultrasound guidance compared with that performed under transabdominal ultrasound guidance, in the general population (38%, n=800 vs 30%, n=3910; P 0.0004) and in the reference population characterized by age <38 years and >6 oocytes collected per puncture (45%, n=490 vs 36%, n=1968; P 0.002). The percentage of pregnancies per transfer (P/T) is not significantly different in the populations of easy transfers (n 695, 38% P/T), difficult transfers (n 58, 46% P/T; P=ns) and very difficult transfers (n 47, 34% P/T; P=ns).
CONCLUSIONS: Embryo transfer is a key stage in IVF, in which the quality of performance determines the outcome. In this study, transvaginal ultrasound guidance of the transfer, which is the reference procedure in gynaecological imaging, significantly increases the percentage of pregnancies per transfer, both in the general population and in the reference population, compared with transfers performed under transabdominal ultrasound guidance. Transvaginal ultrasound facilitates the performance of difficult transfers and in particular achieves outcomes in these situations that are not significantly different from those of easy transfers. Visual monitoring of transcervical passage, which is rendered more precise and less traumatic and precision of embryo deposition are the factors that probably account for the improvement in outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Difficult transfers; Embryo transfer; IVF; Outcomes; Transvaginal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28428123     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod        ISSN: 2468-7847


  16 in total

1.  The Role of Transvaginal Ultrasound Guided Embryo Transfer to Improve Pregnancy Rate in Obese Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.

Authors:  Sarah Mohamed Hassan; Wafaa Ramadan; Mohammed Elsharkawy; Yomna Ali Bayoumi
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2021-09-21

2.  Perinatal outcomes of neonates born from different endometrial preparation protocols after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Yi-Chen He; Jing-Jing Xu; Yu Wang; Han Liu; Chen-Chi Duan; Chao-Yi Shi; Lei Chen; Jie Wang; Jian-Zhong Sheng; He-Feng Huang; Yan-Ting Wu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  A Rare Case of Swyer Syndrome in Two Sisters with Successful Pregnancy Outcome in Both.

Authors:  Anupam Gupta; Ritika Bajaj; Umesh N Jindal
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

4.  Progesterone elevation on the day of hCG trigger has detrimental effect on live birth rate in low and intermediate ovarian responders, but not in high responders.

Authors:  Ze Wu; Yunhua Dong; Yanping Ma; Yonggang Li; Lei Li; Na Lin; Yunxiu Li; Li Zhuan; Yun Bai; Xi Luo; Xiaomin Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A Preclinical Evaluation towards the Clinical Application of Oxygen Consumption Measurement by CERMs by a Mouse Chimera Model.

Authors:  Takashi Kuno; Masahito Tachibana; Ayako Fujimine-Sato; Misaki Fue; Keiko Higashi; Aiko Takahashi; Hiroki Kurosawa; Keisuke Nishio; Naomi Shiga; Zen Watanabe; Nobuo Yaegashi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Evaluation of Uterine Artery Doppler and Estrogen Milieu in Oocyte Donation Pregnancies-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Luca Mandia; Paolo Cavoretto; Piergiorgio Duca; Massimo Candiani; Irene Cetin; Valeria Savasi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-26

7.  Evaluation of a strategy for difficult embryo transfers from a prospective series of 2,046 transfers.

Authors:  Lionel Larue; Laure Bernard; Julie Moulin; Anne Massari; Nino-Guy Cassuto; Dominique Bouret; Gwenola Keromnes
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-12-09

8.  Cumulative Live-Birth Rates by Maternal Age after One or Multiple In Vitro Fertilization Cycles: An Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Dalia Khalife; Anwar Nassar; Ali Khalil; Johnny Awwad; Antoine Abu Musa; Antoine Hannoun; Lina El Taha; Fatin Khalifeh; May Abiad; Ghina Ghazeeri
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-02-25

9.  Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jialyu Huang; Qin Xie; Jiaying Lin; Xuefeng Lu; Jing Zhu; Hongyuan Gao; Renfei Cai; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Assisted hatching of vitrified-warmed blastocysts prior to embryo transfer does not improve pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Charis Ng; Marta Wais; Taryn Nichols; Sarah Garrow; Julius Hreinsson; Zhong-Cheng Luo; Crystal Chan
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.