Rajesh C Rao1, Vaidehi S Dedania2, Mark W Johnson2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; A. Alfred Taubman Medical Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Section of Ophthalmology, Surgical Service, Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: rajeshr@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To summarize key concepts, as well as early safety and efficacy signals from clinical trials, for stem/progenitor cell-based interventions for retinal disease. DESIGN: Interpretive essay. METHODS: Review and synthesis of selected recent reports of stem/progenitor cell-based approaches for retinal disease, with interpretation and perspective. RESULTS: Stem/progenitor cell-based interventions represent a novel class of potential therapies for retinal diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration and inherited retinal dystrophies, aoong others. Sources include pluripotent stem cells and fetal and postnatal tissues. Two mechanisms of "rescue" have been proposed: regenerative or trophic. Although pluripotent and fetal sourced-cell types have been tested in preclinical animal models of retinal disease, many postnatal stem/progenitor cell populations currently in trial do not have preclinical safety or efficacy data. Some early-phase trials of cell therapies suggest acceptable safety profiles. Other reports, involving some types of autologous, nonocular cell sources, have been linked to severe, blinding complications. Larger trials will be needed to determine short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of these cell-based interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Stem/progenitor cell-based interventions have the potential to address blinding retinal diseases that affect hundreds of millions worldwide. Yet no Food and Drug Administration-approved stem cell therapies for retinal disease exist. Although some early-phase trial data are promising, reports of blinding complications from cell interventions remain troubling. It is paramount to apply a strong level of scientific rigor toward a well-planned, step-wise sequence of preclinical and clinical studies, to determine whether this class of potential therapies will be safe and effective for individuals with retinal diseases.
PURPOSE: To summarize key concepts, as well as early safety and efficacy signals from clinical trials, for stem/progenitor cell-based interventions for retinal disease. DESIGN: Interpretive essay. METHODS: Review and synthesis of selected recent reports of stem/progenitor cell-based approaches for retinal disease, with interpretation and perspective. RESULTS: Stem/progenitor cell-based interventions represent a novel class of potential therapies for retinal diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration and inherited retinal dystrophies, aoong others. Sources include pluripotent stem cells and fetal and postnatal tissues. Two mechanisms of "rescue" have been proposed: regenerative or trophic. Although pluripotent and fetal sourced-cell types have been tested in preclinical animal models of retinal disease, many postnatal stem/progenitor cell populations currently in trial do not have preclinical safety or efficacy data. Some early-phase trials of cell therapies suggest acceptable safety profiles. Other reports, involving some types of autologous, nonocular cell sources, have been linked to severe, blinding complications. Larger trials will be needed to determine short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of these cell-based interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Stem/progenitor cell-based interventions have the potential to address blinding retinal diseases that affect hundreds of millions worldwide. Yet no Food and Drug Administration-approved stem cell therapies for retinal disease exist. Although some early-phase trial data are promising, reports of blinding complications from cell interventions remain troubling. It is paramount to apply a strong level of scientific rigor toward a well-planned, step-wise sequence of preclinical and clinical studies, to determine whether this class of potential therapies will be safe and effective for individuals with retinal diseases.
Authors: Sahar Awwad; Abeer H A Mohamed Ahmed; Garima Sharma; Jacob S Heng; Peng T Khaw; Steve Brocchini; Alastair Lockwood Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 8.739