Literature DB >> 28427871

Arthroscopic-Assisted Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acute Acromioclavicular Dislocation Using 2 Clavicular and 1 Coracoid Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tapes.

Sang-Jin Shin1, Yoon Sang Jeon2, Rag Gyu Kim2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To introduce an arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) fixation technique using a cortical fixation button device and to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with acute acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation who were treated with the technique.
METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with grade III and V acute AC dislocation who underwent arthroscopically assisted CC ligament reconstruction using a cortical fixation button device were prospectively enrolled. Our fixation technique involved using a cortical fixation button device consisting of 1 coracoid button and 2 clavicular buttons connected with 2 suture tapes to reconstruct the conoid and trapezoid ligaments, respectively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated and CC distance and horizontal displacement of the AC joint were measured.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 27.2 months (range, 24-32 months). The average CC distance of the injured shoulder was 17.2 ± 5.2 mm preoperatively, which represented an increase of 103% ± 42% compared with the uninjured shoulder. The CC distance was significantly reduced to 8.5 ± 1.5 mm after surgery (P < .001). At the final follow-up, the CC distance was maintained in 20 patients (95%) without loss of reduction. No significant radiologic difference was found in horizontal displacement of the AC joint immediately after the operation and at the final follow-up (P = .422). The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores were 95.7 ± 3.6 and 95.4 ± 3.4, respectively. There were 3 complications, including 1 reduction loss, 1 coracoid process fracture, and 1 CC interval ossification.
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes were obtained simultaneously by arthroscopically assisted CC reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons. This reconstruction technique provided sufficient stability of the AC joint by using 2 clavicular holes to reconstruct the conoid and trapezoid ligaments separately. Therefore, arthroscopically assisted CC ligament reconstruction using a cortical fixation button device for management of acute AC dislocation is considered a viable treatment option for restoring stability to the AC joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28427871     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  9 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Shahbaz Malik; Kieran Bentick; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Low prevalence of relevant associated articular lesions in patients with acute III-VI acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Juan Sarasquete; Mario Gil de Rozas; Pedro Costa; Juan Daniel Tovío; Eduardo Carpinteiro; Abdul Ilah Hachem; Manuel Perez España; Cristina Asenjo Gismero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Miguel García Navlet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Clavicle and coracoid process periprosthetic fractures as late post-operative complications in arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization.

Authors:  Siva Thangaraju; Mark Tauber; Peter Habermeyer; Frank Martetschläger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Arthroscopically Assisted Double-Loop Suture Repair for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption.

Authors:  Emmanouil Μ Fandridis; Frantzeska Zampeli; Panagiotis Dimakopoulos
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Miguel Santiago Moreno Romero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Alfonso Muriel; Jesus López-Alcalde
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [Arthroscopic Twin Tail TightRope combined with distal joint capsule repair technique for acute acromioclavicular dislocation].

Authors:  Chaoran Wang; Jun Zhang; Hong Chen; Daohong Zhao; Yuhao Zhang; Zhidan Wu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-08-15

Review 8.  Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.

Authors:  Marcel Js Tamaoki; Mário Lenza; Fabio T Matsunaga; João Carlos Belloti; Marcelo H Matsumoto; Flávio Faloppa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

9.  Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications after Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Stabilization.

Authors:  Tae Kang Lim; Whang Kyun Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-02-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.