Literature DB >> 28427595

Vasomotor Response to Nitroglycerine Over 5 Years Follow-Up After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation.

Dariusz Dudek1, Łukasz Rzeszutko2, Yoshinobu Onuma3, Yohei Sotomi4, Rafał Depukat2, Susan Veldhof5, Divine Ediebah5, Peter Staehr6, Wojciech Zasada7, Krzysztof P Malinowski8, Grzegorz L Kaluza9, Patrick W Serruys10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the vasomotor response to nitroglycerine (NTG) up to 5 years after ABSORB implantation.
BACKGROUND: There are no data regarding long-term vasomotor response after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold ABSORB implantation.
METHODS: We performed quantitative coronary angiography of the scaffolded and proximal and distal adjacent segments of patients from ABSORB Cohort B study before and after 200 μg of intracoronary NTG at 2, 3, and 5 years of follow-up. The mean changes of maximal and mean lumen diameters in the scaffolded and adjacent segments were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean in-scaffold lumen diameter change in response to NTG showed a trend to increase over time with absolute values of 0.03 ± 0.09 mm, 0.05 ± 0.12 mm, and 0.07 ± 0.08 mm at 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively (p = 0.40). The maximal in-scaffold lumen diameter change significantly increased with values of 0.03 ± 0.14 mm, 0.06 ± 0.16 mm, and 0.11 ± 0.1 mm at 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively (p = 0.03). The normalized mean lumen diameter change after NTG in the scaffold relative to the adjacent segments was 51.9 ± 54.8% at 5 years of follow-up (p = 0.60).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a numerical increase of the vasomotor response to NTG after ABSORB implantation measured by quantitative coronary angiography with mean lumen diameter, the change was not statistically significant. However, the maximal lumen diameter changes increased over time from 2 to 5 years and attained statistical significance. The vasomotor response to NTG after ABSORB implantation moderately trended to increase, which is consistent with the progressive degradation and bioresorption of the scaffold, but the degree of vasomotor response remained lower in comparison with adjacent segments.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABSORB; bioresorbable scaffold; vasomotion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28427595     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Current Literature on Bioabsorbable Stents: a Review.

Authors:  Wally A Omar; Dharam J Kumbhani
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Bioresorbable scaffold implantation in STEMI patients: 5 years imaging subanalysis of PRAGUE-19 study.

Authors:  Viktor Kočka; Petr Toušek; Martin Kozel; Andrea Buono; Martin Hajšl; Libor Lisa; Tomáš Buděšínský; Martin Malý; Petr Widimský
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 3.  Inflammation as a determinant of healing response after coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  Dorota Ochijewicz; Mariusz Tomaniak; Grzegorz Opolski; Janusz Kochman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.