Literature DB >> 28427271

The value of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in breast cancer: comparison with MRI.

Eun Kyoung Choi1, Ie Ryung Yoo2, Sung Hun Kim2, Sonya Youngju Park3, Joo Hyun O2, Bong Joo Kang2.   

Abstract

Background Accurate assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide appropriate operation guidelines for individual breast cancer patients. Purpose To compare the values of PET/CT and MRI for response evaluation following NAC in breast cancer patients. Material and Methods Thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent NAC were included. PET/CT and MRI were performed before and one to four weeks after NAC. With response evaluation of PET/CT and MRI, patients with complete/partial responses on imaging studies were considered to be responders, and those showing stable/progressive disease non-responders. Peak standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were measured from PET/CT, and unidimensional diameter (1D) and tumor volume (TV) from MRI. Reduction rates for each parameter were calculated (Δ%SULpeak, Δ%MTV, Δ%1D, and Δ%TV). The pathological response for NAC as reference was evaluated after surgical resection of the remaining tumor in the breast. Results We identified 17 pathological responders and 16 non-responders. PET/CT had lower specificity and accuracy, but higher sensitivity than MRI, although no significant difference was found between PET/CT and MRI. Following NAC, there were significant differences between pathological responders and non-responders in SULpeak ( P < 0.001), MTV ( P < 0.001), 1D ( P = 0.0003), TV ( P = 0.038), Δ%SULpeak ( P = 0.001), Δ%MTV ( P < 0.001), Δ%1D ( P < 0.001), and Δ%TV ( P = 0.001). Conclusion PET/CT showed lower specificity and accuracy than MRI in evaluating responses to NAC, but both PET/CT and MRI parameters may have predictive value in distinguishing therapeutic responders and non-responders following NAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; neoadjuvant therapy; positron-emission tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28427271     DOI: 10.1177/0284185117705011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  3 in total

Review 1.  MRI Performance in Detecting pCR After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Molecular Subtype of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nancy Yu; Vivian W Y Leung; Sarkis Meterissian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer judged by PERCIST - multicenter study in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koya Nakatani; Kazushige Yamaguchi; Masatoyo Nakajo; Atsushi Tani; Mana Ishibashi; Keiko Hosoya; Takahiro Morita; Takayuki Kinoshita; Hayato Kaida; Yasuo Miyoshi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response using diffuse optical spectroscopy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ying-Hua Yu; Xiao Zhu; Qin-Guo Mo; Ying Cui
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.405

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.