Literature DB >> 28426631

DIRECTIONAL CHANGES IN TISSUE REFLECTIVITY MAY INFLUENCE FLOW DETECTION ON OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY.

Rosa Dolz-Marco1,2, K Bailey Freund1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if directional or anatomical changes in tissue reflectivity of Henle fiber layer (HFL) may influence flow detection on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A).
METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of consecutive cases undergoing OCT-A. Directional changes in visualization of HFL were either produced manually by moving the beam entrance within the pupil or observed occurring naturally because of tilting of the OCT line-scan within a myopic staphyloma. Areas of enhanced HFL visualization were identified on cross-sectional and en face structural OCT scans. Visualization of OCT-A flow within the superficial and the deep capillary plexuses were compared in areas with and without enhanced HFL reflectivity.
RESULTS: Fifteen eyes from 9 patients were included, with a mean age of 49.6 ± 17.9 years. On OCT-A, retinal areas with enhanced HFL reflectivity produced manually or by scan tilting within myopic staphylomas showed no changes in the superficial capillary plexus flow. However, deep capillary plexus flow was altered by variable projection of the superficial flow onto the deeper retinal layers.
CONCLUSION: Directional changes in HFL reflectivity can alter the detection of deep capillary plexus flow imaged with OCT-A by influencing the projection of superficial flow onto the deeper retinal layers. We recommend that clinicians minimize scan tilting during scan acquisition and be aware of this phenomenon in eyes with posterior staphyloma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28426631     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  6 in total

1.  Signal reduction in choriocapillaris and segmentation errors in spectral domain OCT angiography caused by soft drusen.

Authors:  F Alten; J L Lauermann; C R Clemens; P Heiduschka; N Eter
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Prevalence and Severity of Artifacts in Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiograms.

Authors:  Ian C Holmen; Sri Meghana Konda; Jeong W Pak; Kyle W McDaniel; Barbara Blodi; Kimberly E Stepien; Amitha Domalpally
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 3.  Optical coherence tomography angiography: a review of current and future clinical applications.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Anna C S Tan; Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung; Pearse A Keane; Rosa Dolz-Marco; Chelvin C A Sng; Leopold Schmetterer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Healthy Adult Subjects: Normative Values, Frequency, and Impact of Artifacts.

Authors:  Nakhleh E Abu-Yaghi; Abdelrahman F Obiedat; Tamara I AlNawaiseh; Ali M Hamad; Basil A Bani Ata; Ahmad A Quzli; Saif Aldeen AlRyalat
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Appearance of cysts and capillary non perfusion areas in diabetic macular edema using two different OCTA devices.

Authors:  Mariacristina Parravano; Eliana Costanzo; Enrico Borrelli; Riccardo Sacconi; Gianni Virgili; SriniVas R Sadda; Fabio Scarinci; Monica Varano; Francesco Bandello; Giuseppe Querques
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Impact of Scan Tilt on Quantitative Assessments Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Yong Sok Ji; Ahmed Roshdy Alagorie; Iksoo Byon; SriniVas R Sadda
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.