Paula Ferrada1, Rachael Callcut, Martin D Zielinski, Brandon Bruns, Daniel Dante Yeh, Tanya L Zakrison, Jonathan P Meizoso, Babak Sarani, Richard D Catalano, Peter Kim, Valerie Plant, Amelia Pasley, Linda A Dultz, Asad J Choudhry, Elliott R Haut. 1. From the Virginia Commonwealth University (P.F., V.P.), Richmond, Virginia; University of California San Francisco (R.C.), San Francisco, California; Mayo Clinic Rochester (M.D.Z., A.J.C.), Rochester, New York; University of Maryland School of Medicine (B.B., A.P.), Baltimore, Maryland; Massachusetts General Hospital (D.D.Y.), Boston, Massachusetts; University of Miami Miller School of Medicine (T.L.Z., J.P.M.), Miami, Florida; George Washington University (B.S.), Washington, DC; Loma Linda University and Medical Center (R.D.C.), San Bernardino, California; Albert Einstein College of Medicine (P.K.), New York, New York; The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (L.A.D., E.R.H.), Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The mortality of patients with Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) requiring surgery continues to be very high. Loop ileostomy (LI) was introduced as an alternative procedure to total colectomy (TC) for CDAD by a single-center study. To date, no reproducible results have been published. The objective of this study was to compare these two procedures in a multicentric approach to help the surgeon decide what procedure is best suited for the patient in need. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study conducted under the sponsorship of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, APACHE score, and outcomes were collected. We used the Research Electronic Data Capture tool to store the data. Mann-Whitney (continuous data) and Fisher exact (categorical data) were used to compare TC with LI. Logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of mortality. A propensity score analysis was done to control for potential confounders and determine adjusted mortality rates by procedure type. RESULTS: We collected data from 10 centers of patients who presented with CDAD requiring surgery between July 1, 2010 and July 30, 2014. Two patients died during the surgical procedure, leaving 98 individuals in the study. The overall mortality was 32%, and 75% had postoperative complications. Median age was 64.5 years; 59% were male. Concerning preoperative patient conditions, 54% were on pressors, 47% had renal failure, and 36% had respiratory failure. When comparing TC and LI, there was no statistical difference regarding these conditions. Univariate preprocedure predictors of mortality were age, lactate, timing of operation, vasopressor use, and acute renal failure. There was no statistical difference between the APACHE score of patients undergoing either procedure (TC, 22 vs LI, 16). Adjusted mortality (controlled for preprocedure confounders) was significantly lower in the LI group (17.2% vs 39.7%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicenter study comparing TC with LI for the treatment of CDAD. In this study, LI carried less mortality than TC. In patients without contraindications, LI should be considered for the surgical treatment of CDAD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.
OBJECTIVES: The mortality of patients with Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) requiring surgery continues to be very high. Loop ileostomy (LI) was introduced as an alternative procedure to total colectomy (TC) for CDAD by a single-center study. To date, no reproducible results have been published. The objective of this study was to compare these two procedures in a multicentric approach to help the surgeon decide what procedure is best suited for the patient in need. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study conducted under the sponsorship of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, APACHE score, and outcomes were collected. We used the Research Electronic Data Capture tool to store the data. Mann-Whitney (continuous data) and Fisher exact (categorical data) were used to compare TC with LI. Logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of mortality. A propensity score analysis was done to control for potential confounders and determine adjusted mortality rates by procedure type. RESULTS: We collected data from 10 centers of patients who presented with CDAD requiring surgery between July 1, 2010 and July 30, 2014. Two patients died during the surgical procedure, leaving 98 individuals in the study. The overall mortality was 32%, and 75% had postoperative complications. Median age was 64.5 years; 59% were male. Concerning preoperative patient conditions, 54% were on pressors, 47% had renal failure, and 36% had respiratory failure. When comparing TC and LI, there was no statistical difference regarding these conditions. Univariate preprocedure predictors of mortality were age, lactate, timing of operation, vasopressor use, and acute renal failure. There was no statistical difference between the APACHE score of patients undergoing either procedure (TC, 22 vs LI, 16). Adjusted mortality (controlled for preprocedure confounders) was significantly lower in the LI group (17.2% vs 39.7%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicenter study comparing TC with LI for the treatment of CDAD. In this study, LI carried less mortality than TC. In patients without contraindications, LI should be considered for the surgical treatment of CDAD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.
Authors: Alexander J Greenstein; John C Byrn; Linda P Zhang; Kristin A Swedish; Alice E Jahn; Celia M Divino Journal: Surgery Date: 2008-03-24 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Konstantinos Z Vardakas; Konstantinos A Polyzos; Konstantina Patouni; Petros I Rafailidis; George Samonis; Matthew E Falagas Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Anna Z Fashandi; Allison N Martin; Patty T Wang; Traci L Hedrick; Charles M Friel; Philip W Smith; R Ann Hays; Peter T Hallowell Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Adam D Shellito; Jill Q Dworsky; Patrick J Kirkland; Ronnie A Rosenthal; Catherine A Sarkisian; Clifford Y Ko; Marcia M Russell Journal: Ann Surg Open Date: 2021-09
Authors: Tyler McKechnie; Yung Lee; Jeremy E Springer; Aristithes G Doumouras; Dennis Hong; Cagla Eskicioglu Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Stefano Di Bella; Lynne V McFarland; Sahil Khanna; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Nadir Abuzeid; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Luca Ansaloni; Goran Augustin; Miklosh Bala; Offir Ben-Ishay; Walter L Biffl; Stephen M Brecher; Adrián Camacho-Ortiz; Miguel A Caínzos; Shirley Chan; Jill R Cherry-Bukowiec; Jesse Clanton; Federico Coccolini; Maria E Cocuz; Raul Coimbra; Francesco Cortese; Yunfeng Cui; Jacek Czepiel; Zaza Demetrashvili; Isidoro Di Carlo; Salomone Di Saverio; Irina M Dumitru; Christian Eckmann; Edward H Eiland; Joseph D Forrester; Gustavo P Fraga; Jean L Frossard; Donald E Fry; Rita Galeiras; Wagih Ghnnam; Carlos A Gomes; Ewen A Griffiths; Xavier Guirao; Mohamed H Ahmed; Torsten Herzog; Jae Il Kim; Tariq Iqbal; Arda Isik; Kamal M F Itani; Francesco M Labricciosa; Yeong Y Lee; Paul Juang; Aleksandar Karamarkovic; Peter K Kim; Yoram Kluger; Ari Leppaniemi; Varut Lohsiriwat; Gustavo M Machain; Sanjay Marwah; John E Mazuski; Gokhan Metan; Ernest E Moore; Frederick A Moore; Carlos A Ordoñez; Leonardo Pagani; Nicola Petrosillo; Francisco Portela; Kemal Rasa; Miran Rems; Boris E Sakakushev; Helmut Segovia-Lohse; Gabriele Sganga; Vishal G Shelat; Patrizia Spigaglia; Pierre Tattevin; Cristian Tranà; Libor Urbánek; Jan Ulrych; Pierluigi Viale; Gian L Baiocchi; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Max W Adelman; Michael H Woodworth; Virginia O Shaffer; Greg S Martin; Colleen S Kraft Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 9.296
Authors: E Bouza; J M Aguado; L Alcalá; B Almirante; P Alonso-Fernández; M Borges; J Cobo; J Guardiola; J P Horcajada; E Maseda; J Mensa; N Merchante; P Muñoz; J L Pérez Sáenz; M Pujol; E Reigadas; M Salavert; J Barberán Journal: Rev Esp Quimioter Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 1.553