Literature DB >> 2842655

Kinetic and equilibrium studies of Ah receptor-ligand binding: use of [125I]2-iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin.

C A Bradfield1, A S Kende, A Poland.   

Abstract

In this report, we have used the radioligand [125I]2-iodo-7,8-dibromo-dibenzo-p-dioxin to describe the kinetics of ligand binding to the Ah receptor prepared from C57BL/6J mouse liver. The higher specific activity of this radioligand (2176 Ci/mmol), compared with the usual tritiated ligand [1,6-3H]2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin (58 Ci/mmol) permitted the study of ligand-receptor interactions at much lower component concentrations. For this radioiodinated ligand, Scatchard analysis of saturation binding curves, determined at six different protein concentrations, indicated that the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant, KD, was directly related to the dilution of the receptor preparation; for example, at 1160 micrograms of protein/ml, KD = 1.6 x 10(-10) M; at 36 micrograms of protein/ml, KD = 1.2 x 10(-11) M. Extrapolation of this function to infinite receptor dilution yielded KD = 6 x 10(-12) M. The addition of 70 micrograms/ml of bovine serum albumin to a receptor preparation of 30 micrograms of protein/ml produced a 10-fold decrease in the slope of the Scatchard plot (i.e., 10-fold increase in the apparent KD). Conversely, enrichment of the receptor by high performance liquid chromatography led to an increased slope and thus decreased estimate of KD. The association rate constant (k1), calculated from the integrated second-order rate equation, was 2.8 x 10(10) M-1 hr-1 and, from the initial velocity equation, had a value of 5.25 x 10(10) M-1 hr-1. The dissociation rate constant was biphasic, consisting of a predominant fast component with a rate constant of 0.36 hr-1 (k-1) and a slower component with a rate constant of 4.2-9.4 x 10(-3) hr-1 (k-2). Higher protein concentrations produced a decrease in estimates of k1 but not k-1 or k-2. The KD determined from the ratio of the kinetic rate constant, k-1/k1 = 6.9 x 10(-12) M, is in excellent agreement with that derived from the results of equilibrium binding experiments extrapolated to infinite dilution, KD = 6 x 10(-12) M. The decrease in KD, observed in equilibrium binding studies upon dilution of the receptor preparation, is best explained by a more accurate classification of "free" radioligand at lower protein concentrations. Finally, ligand binding to the Ah receptor is best described by a two-step process, the formation of an initial complex, characterized by rapid ligand dissociation, which undergoes transformation to a second distinct complex displaying a much slower ligand dissociation rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2842655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  21 in total

1.  Characterization of a murine Ahr null allele: involvement of the Ah receptor in hepatic growth and development.

Authors:  J V Schmidt; G H Su; J K Reddy; M C Simon; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Ah receptor and the mechanism of dioxin toxicity.

Authors:  J P Landers; N J Bunce
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Role of the ligand in intracellular receptor function: receptor affinity determines activation in vitro of the latent dioxin receptor to a DNA-binding form.

Authors:  S Cuthill; A Wilhelmsson; L Poellinger
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Modulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-dependent signaling by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β/δ (PPARβ/δ) in keratinocytes.

Authors:  Michael G Borland; Prasad Krishnan; Christina Lee; Prajakta P Albrecht; Weiwei Shan; Moses T Bility; Craig B Marcus; Jyh M Lin; Shantu Amin; Frank J Gonzalez; Gary H Perdew; Jeffrey M Peters
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptors in the frog Xenopus laevis: two AhR1 paralogs exhibit low affinity for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).

Authors:  Jeremy A Lavine; Ashley J Rowatt; Tatyana Klimova; Aric J Whitington; Emelyne Dengler; Catherine Beck; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  In vitro analysis of Ah receptor domains involved in ligand-activated DNA recognition.

Authors:  K M Dolwick; H I Swanson; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Transformation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor to a DNA-binding form is accompanied by release of the 90 kDa heat-shock protein and increased affinity for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  E C Henry; T A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Aromatic hydrocarbon responsiveness-receptor agonists generated from indole-3-carbinol in vitro and in vivo: comparisons with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  L F Bjeldanes; J Y Kim; K R Grose; J C Bartholomew; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Ribonuclease inhibits Ah receptor transformation in vitro.

Authors:  E C Henry; K A Hayden; P A Bauman; T A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 10.  The search for endogenous activators of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Linh P Nguyen; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.