Agreement between MRI and pathologic analyses for determination of tumor size and correlation with immunohistochemical factors of invasive breast carcinoma.

Background There may be discordance between tumor size determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and that observed during pathologic analyses. Purpose To evaluate MRI-pathology concordance of tumor size in patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Material and Methods Data from 307 invasive breast carcinomas were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative breast MRI was reviewed for size, lesion type, morphology, and dynamic contrast-enhanced tumor kinetics. MRI tumor size was compared with tumor size measurements from the pathologic analysis. Concordance was defined as a difference in diameter of ≤ 0.5 cm. MRI-pathology concordance was compared according to clinical and histopathologic features. Results The mean tumor size on MRI was 2.48 ± 1.41 cm. Tumor measurements determined by MRI were not significantly different from those recorded in the pathologic reports (2.56 ± 1.61 cm, P = 0.199). MRI-pathology concordance was found in 229/307 (74.6%) cases; the size was overestimated in 36 (11.7%) tumors and underestimated in 42 (13.7%). On univariate analysis, MRI-pathology discordance was associated with larger tumor size ( P < 0.001), estrogen receptor (ER) negativity ( P = 0.006), and lymphovascular invasion ( P = 0.003). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive molecular subtype showed worse correlation between the tumor size measured by MRI and pathology compared with luminal A and luminal B subtypes ( P = 0.008 and 0.007). On multivariate analysis, tumor size and ER status significantly influenced MRI-pathology concordance ( P < 0.05). Conclusion ER negativity and larger tumor size were strongly associated with MRI-pathology discordance in invasive breast carcinomas. Awareness of these factors might improve surgical planning.