Literature DB >> 28425362

To be or not to be: Stuttering and the human costs of being "un-disabled".

Brian Watermeyer1, Harsha Kathard1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The centrality of communicating in human life means that communication difficulties are experienced at a deeply personal level and have significant implications for identity. Intervention methods may interact positively or negatively with these experiences.
METHOD: This paper explores this intersection in the case of stuttering, suggesting that some intervention styles may dovetail unhelpfully with the "mainstream" prizing of normalcy. In particular, most "western" societies offer a performance-oriented milieu which prizes efficiency, immediacy and competitiveness, diverting energy from the equally important work of understanding and integrating difference. RESULT: Given that a person who stutters speaks fluently and with a stutter, stuttering can lean toward a complex view of disability identity-being both able and disabled. This split repertoire invites psychologically costly efforts at being "un-disabled".
CONCLUSION: Interventions which amplify this tendency can contribute to an alienation from self amid strivings for normalcy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stuttering; identity; intervention; normalcy; split repertoire

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 28425362     DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1060528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1754-9507            Impact factor:   2.484


  1 in total

1.  'Satan is holding your tongue back': Stuttering as moral failure.

Authors:  Dane H Isaacs
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2021-04-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.