Literature DB >> 28424956

Removal of selected pesticides from groundwater by membrane distillation.

Julia Plattner1,2, Christian Kazner1,2, Gayathri Naidu1, Thomas Wintgens2, Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran3.   

Abstract

The removal of five selected pesticide compounds in a brackish model groundwater solution was examined using a bench scale direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) system. It was found that the rejection rate of the pesticides in DCMD is mainly influenced by its properties. Compounds with low hydrophobic characteristics and low vapour pressure showed a high rejection rate (70-99%), whereas compounds with a high vapour pressure or high hydrophobicity (LogD) showed a reduced rejection (30-50%) at a water recovery of 75%. The influence of groundwater feed solution contents such as the presence of organics (humic acid) and inorganic ions (Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl- and SO42-) as well as feed temperature (40, 55 and 70 °C) on the rejection of the pesticides in DCMD operation was also evaluated. The results showed that the presence of inorganic ions and organics in the feed solution influences the pesticides rejection in DCMD operation to a minor degree. In contrast, reduced rejection of pesticides with high vapour pressure was observed. A rapid small-scale column test (RSSCT) was carried out to study the removal of any remaining substances in the permeate by adsorption onto granular activated carbon (GAC). RSSCT showed promising performance of GAC as a post-treatment option.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrazine; Clofibric acid; Dichlorvos; Direct contact membrane distillation; Granular activated carbon; Parathion-methyl; Phorate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28424956     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8929-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  3 in total

1.  A novel application of membrane distillation to facilitate nickel recovery from electroplating wastewater.

Authors:  Hung C Duong; Thao M Pham; Son T Luong; Ky V Nguyen; Diu T Nguyen; Ashley J Ansari; Long D Nghiem
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Nanocomposite Polymeric Membranes for Organic Micropollutant Removal: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Yichen Wu; Ming Chen; Hye-Jin Lee; Mohamed A Ganzoury; Nan Zhang; Charles-François de Lannoy
Journal:  ACS ES T Eng       Date:  2022-08-23

Review 3.  The Use of Polymer Membranes to Counteract the Risk of Environmental of Soil and Water Contamination.

Authors:  Anna Rabajczyk; Maria Zielecka; Krzysztof Cygańczuk; Łukasz Pastuszka; Leszek Jurecki
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.