Literature DB >> 28424880

Herbicide Toxicity Testing with Non-Target Boreal Plants: The Sensitivity of Achillea millefolium L. and Chamerion angustifolium L. to Triclopyr and Imazapyr.

Krystal M Isbister1, Eric G Lamb1, Katherine J Stewart2,3.   

Abstract

Terrestrial plant toxicity tests were conducted to determine the sensitivity of two boreal plants, yarrow (Achillea millefolium L.) and fireweed (Chamerion angustifolium L.), to the herbicides imazapyr and triclopyr. Both plants are common non-target species on northern powerline rights-of-way where the impacts of proposed herbicide applications are of concern. In the vegetative vigour test, triclopyr foliar spray caused extensive damage to A. millefolium at <50% of the maximum field application rate (inhibition concentration (IC)50 = 1443.8 g a.i. ha-1) and was lethal to C. angustifolium at the lowest dose tested (1210.9 g a.i. ha-1). Both species demonstrated extremely high sensitivity to imazapyr foliar spray: IC50s = 8.29 g a.i. ha-1 and 4.82 g a.i. ha-1 (<1.5% of the maximum field rate). The seedling emergence and seedling growth tests were conducted in the organic horizon of five boreal soils. Few differences in herbicide bioavailability between soils were detected. Triclopyr limited growth of A. millefolium, C. angustifolium and standard test species Calamagrostis canadensis at low levels (most IC50 estimates between 2-20 µg g-1). For imazapyr, IC50 estimates could not be calculated as there was >75% inhibition of endpoints at the lowest doses of ~2 µg g-1. A foliar application of triclopyr or imazapyr for woody species control would likely cause significant damage to boreal non-target plants. The high sensitivity of both species to herbicide residues in soil indicates long term impacts are dependent on herbicide degradation rates in northern conditions. A. millefolium performed well and is recommended for use in toxicity testing relevant to boreal regions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achillea millefolium; Boreal; Chamerion angustifolium; Ecotoxicity; Imazapyr; Triclopyr

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28424880     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0867-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new battery of toxicity tests for boreal forest soils: assessment of the impact of hydrocarbons and salts.

Authors:  Juliska I Princz; Mary Moody; Christopher Fraser; Leana Van der Vliet; Heather Lemieux; Rick Scroggins; Steven D Siciliano
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Sources of variability in plant toxicity testing.

Authors:  Jeremy Clark; Lisa S Ortego; Anne Fairbrother
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Herbicidal effects on nontarget vegetation: investigating the limitations of current pesticide registration guidelines.

Authors:  Andrea L White; Céline Boutin
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Influence of soil organic matter on the sensitivity of selected wild and crop species to common herbicides.

Authors:  Jane E Allison; Céline Boutin; David Carpenter
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Performance of potential non-crop or wild species under OECD 208 testing guideline study conditions for terrestrial non-target plants.

Authors:  Ken Pallett; Jon Cole; Christian Oberwalder; John Porch
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.845

6.  A comparison of crop and non-crop plants as sensitive indicator species for regulatory testing.

Authors:  Robert A McKelvey; John P Wright; Joy L Honegger
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.845

7.  Demographic analysis of tree colonization in a 20-year-old right-of-way.

Authors:  C Mercier; J Brison; A Bouchard
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Sublethal effects of the herbicide glufosinate ammonium on crops and wild plants: short-term effects compared to vegetative recovery and plant reproduction.

Authors:  David Carpenter; Céline Boutin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Selecting and evaluating native plants for region-specific phytotoxicity testing.

Authors:  David Olszyk; Thomas Pfleeger; E Henry Lee; Connie Burdick; George King; Milton Plocher; Jeffrey Kern
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.992

10.  Dose-Response Analysis Using R.

Authors:  Christian Ritz; Florent Baty; Jens C Streibig; Daniel Gerhard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Determination of the Ecotoxicity of Herbicides Roundup® Classic Pro and Garlon New in Aquatic and Terrestrial Environments.

Authors:  Lucia Tajnaiová; Radek Vurm; Marina Kholomyeva; Miroslav Kobera; Vladimír Kočí
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.