| Literature DB >> 28424626 |
Enrica Marmonti1, Sílvia Busquets1,2, Míriam Toledo1, Marina Ricci1, Marc Beltrà1, Victòria Gudiño1, Francesc Oliva3, José M López-Pedrosa4, Manuel Manzano4, Ricardo Rueda4, Francisco J López-Soriano1,2, Josep M Argilés1,2.
Abstract
Bed rest has been an established treatment in the past prescribed for critically illness or convalescing patients, in order to preserve their body metabolic resource, to prevent serious complications and to support their rapid path to recovery. However, it has been reported that prolonged bed rest can have detrimental consequences that may delay or prevent the recovery from clinical illness. In order to study disuse-induced changes in muscle and bone, as observed during prolonged bed rest in humans, an innovative new model of muscle disuse for rodents is presented. Basically, the animals are confined to a reduced space designed to restrict their locomotion movements and allow them to drink and eat easily, without generating physical stress. The animals were immobilized for either 7, 14, or 28 days. The immobilization procedure induced a significant decrease of food intake, both at 14 and 28 days of immobilization. The reduced food intake was not a consequence of a stress condition induced by the model since plasma corticosterone levels -an indicator of a stress response- were not altered following the immobilization period. The animals showed a significant decrease in soleus muscle mass, grip force and cross-sectional area (a measure of fiber size), together with a decrease in bone mineral density. The present model may potentially serve to investigate the effects of bed-rest in pathological states characterized by a catabolic condition, such as diabetes or cancer.Entities:
Keywords: body composition; bone density; corticosteroids; disuse-induced atrophy; muscle performance; physical inactivity
Year: 2017 PMID: 28424626 PMCID: PMC5372807 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Immobilization model. (A) Representative pictures of immobilized rats and control rat in a standard cage. Each immobilization cage is able to host two animals and it is equipped (in its upper part) with a grating to dispose food and water. (B) Schematic representation of the immobilization tested model. The cage had a reduction in volume of 80% in relation with control standard cage. The arrow indicated the housing area of a single rat.
Figure 2Timeline of the experimental plan. Day 7: CONTROL (n = 5) and immobilized group (IMMO) (n = 6); day 14: CONTROL (n = 9) and immobilized group (IMMO) (n = 12); day 28: CONTROL (n = 5) and IMMO (n = 6). OGTT: Oral glucose tolerance test.
Body weight gain, food intake, energetic efficiency, and body composition in immobilized Wistar rats.
| (FBW-IBW) | 6.2 ± 3.8(5) | 9.2 ± 2.3(6) | 36.7 ± 4.5(9) | 22.3 ± 4.8(12) | 43.4 ± 9.1(5) | 43.4 ± 5.1(6) | ns | 0.001 | ns |
| DAILY FOOD INTAKE | 7.4 ± 0.4(5) | 6.9 ± 0.2(6) | 6.1 ± 0.1(9) | 5.5 ± 0.2(12) | 5.3 ± 0.3(5) | 5.0 ± 0.2(6) | 0.015 | 0.001 | ns |
| ENERGETIC EFFICIENCY | 4.1 ± 2.7(5) | 7.0 ± 1.8(6) | 13.6 ± 1.5(9) | 9.0 ± 1.9(12) | 9.1 ± 1.5(5) | 9.9 ± 0.9(6) | ns | 0.016 | ns |
| % FAT MASS | 10.3 ± 0.7(5) | 10.0 ± 0.3(6) | 12.2 ± 0.4(9) | 11.8 ± 0.4(12) | 12.2 ± 0.8(5) | 11.7 ± 0.8(6) | ns | 0.004 | ns |
| % LEAN MASS | 85.0 ± 1.0(5) | 85.4 ± 0.6(6) | 83.0 ± 0.6(9) | 83.0 ± 0.4(12) | 82.6 ± 0.7(5) | 83.9 ± 0.7(6) | ns | 0.030 | ns |
Data are summarized as mean ± SEM, number of animals (replicates) indicated in parentheses for control (CONTROL) and immobilized (IMMO) groups. IBW, initial body weight, FBW, final body weight (in grams). The formula used to calculate the ENERGETIC EFFICIENCY was [(FBW-IBW)/food ingested] × 100, ingested food in grams. The formula used to calculate the DAILY FOOD INTAKE was (food ingested per day within the period/IBW) × 100, food intake are expressed as grams per 100 grams of initial body weight. Upper body composition (FAT and LEAN MASS percentage) was measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging analysis. Statistical significant differences were evaluated by a full factorial two-way ANOVA (fixed factors: I, immobilization, T, Time; IxT denotes the interaction term), p-values are shown in the three columns on the right (ns, non-significant differences, which implies a p-value equal to or greater than 0.05).
Plasmatic corticosteroid levels and adrenal glands weight.
| Day 1 | 335 ± 57 (4) | 242 ± 33 (5) |
| Day 4 | 212 ± 67 (5) | 271 ± 66 (5) |
| Day 8 | 314 ± 48 (5) | 213 ± 20 (4) |
| Day 14 | 190 ± 61 (4) | 384 ± 74 (4) |
| Day 7 | 27.9 ± 2.7 (4) | 24.0 ± 2.7 (6) |
| Day 14 | 30.2 ± 0.9 (9) | 27.6 ± 1.0 (9) |
Corticosteroid levels (ng/mL) are expressed as mean ± SEM for the number of animals indicated in parentheses for control (CONTROL) and immobilized (IMMO) groups. Adrenal glands weights are expressed as milligrams per 100 grams of initial body weight. Data were analyzed by a Repeated Measures Linear Mixed Model, being time (T) the repeated measures factor and immobilization (I) a fixed-effects factor. Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) method was used to fit the mixed model. According to the values of Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), identity scaling was finally chosen as the covariance matrix structure. For corticosteroid levels: no significant differences were detected over time (T, p = 0.806) or for the immobilization factor (I, p = 0.697), neither for interaction (IxT, p = 0.052). For adrenal glands: Statistical significance was tested by a full factorial two-way ANOVA (fixed factors: immobilization (I) (p = 0.080), Time (T) (p = 0.516); interaction (IxT) (p = 0.990).
Figure 3Area under the curve (AUC) of plasma incremental glycaemia values in immobilized Wistar rats. Each bar and segment represents mean values ± SEM for CONTROL (n = 5) and immobilized groups (IMMO) (n = 6). Statistical significant differences were evaluated by a full factorial two-way ANOVA (fixed factors: I = immobilization, T = Time; IxT denotes the interaction term): I, p = ns; T, p = 0.033; IxT, p = 0.021. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed (Duncan method); different letters (a and b) indicate significant differences between the experimental groups.
Muscle weights and grip force in immobilized Wistar rats.
| GSN | 597.6 ± 16.1(5) | 604.1 ± 8.2(6) | 592.2 ± 14.7(9) | 607.7 ± 9.7(12) | 674.4 ± 8.0(5) | 659.0 ± 16.6(6) | ns | 0.001 | ns |
| EDL | 47.1 ± 2.0(5) | 48.4 ± 1.3(6) | 45.6 ± 1.3(9) | 47.2 ± 0.7(12) | 49.2 ± 0.3(5) | 48.6 ± 1.9(6) | ns | ns | ns |
| TIB | 184.6 ± 10.2(5) | 193.6 ± 2.3(6) | 194.0 ± 5.1(9) | 195.9 ± 3.1(12) | 207.4 ± 5.7(5) | 207.5 ± 6.3(6) | ns | 0.012 | ns |
| SOL | 43.7 ± 2.9(5) | 40.5 ± 0.9(6) | 42.7 ± 1.5(8) | 38.2 ± 0.5(12) | 48.2 ± 2.1(5) | 41.8 ± 0.6(6) | 0.001 | 0.004 | ns |
| HEART | 264.8 ± 7.8(5) | 244.3 ± 3.0(6) | 276.3 ± 3.8(9) | 240.9 ± 7.2(12) | 266.7 ± 5.5(5) | 269.3 ± 7.7(6) | 0.004 | ns | 0.026 |
| GRIP FORCE | 3.8 ± 0.1(5) | 3.3 ± 0.1(6) | 3.7 ± 0.1(8) | 3.5 ± 0.1(11) | 4.0 ± 0.2(5) | 3.8 ± 0.2(6) | 0.005 | 0.029 | ns |
Mean ± SEM for the number of animals indicated in parentheses are shown for every period for control (CONTROL) and immobilized (IMMO) groups. Muscle weights are expressed as milligrams per 100 grams of initial body weight. Statistical significance was tested by a full factorial two-way ANOVA (fixed factors: I, immobilization, T, Time; IxT denotes the interaction term), p-values are shown in the three columns on the right (ns, non-significant differences, which implies a p-value equal to or greater than 0.05). It has been detected a significant interaction term in the model for the heart, so that pairwise comparisons were performed (Duncan method); different letters indicate significant differences between the experimental groups. GSN, gastrocnemius, EDL, extensor digitorum longus, TIB, tibialis, SOL: soleus. Muscle force of the animal was tested once a week and was expressed as g/g initial body weight.
Bone Mineral density (BMD) of immobilized Wistar rats.
| LV-25 | 175.1 ± 3.9 (5) | 173.4 ± 2.6 (6) | 183.5 ± 2.4 (9) | 172.7 ± 2.2 (12) | 189.9 ± 3.5 (5) | 180.1 ± 4.2 (6) | 0.006 | 0.011 | ns |
| HUMERUS | 159.8 ± 2.1 (5) | 162.8 ± 2.2 (6) | 169.6 ± 2.9 (9) | 165.2 ± 2.0 (12) | 175.3 ± 2.0 (5) | 175.6 ± 2.6 (6) | ns | 0.001 | ns |
| FOREARM | 154.9 ± 2.3 (5) | 161.8 ± 2.5 (6) | 162.2 ± 4.7 (9) | 161.0 ± 1.9 (12) | 165.9 ± 4.6 (5) | 166.9 ± 3.0 (6) | ns | ns | ns |
| TIBIA | 150.7 ± 0.9 (5) | 150.6 ± 0.8 (6) | 159.2 ± 0.9 (8) | 152.9 ± 1.9 (12) | 165.6 ± 1.8 (5) | 164.2 ± 2.6 (6) | ns | 0.001 | ns |
| FEMUR | 196.5 ± 3.3 (5) | 198.8 ± 1.2 (6) | 208.5 ± 2.4 (9) | 201.3 ± 4.1 (12) | 219.1 ± 2.6 (5) | 213.7 ± 4.0 (6) | ns | 0.001 | ns |
Mean ± SEM for the number of animals indicated in parentheses for control (CONTROL) and immobilized (IMMO) groups are shown for every period. Bone Mineral density (BMD) was measured by peripheral Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (pDEXA) analysis and expressed as mg/cm.
Figure 4Gastrointestinal motility in immobilized Wistar rats. The represented results are mean values ± SEM for control group (CONTROL) (n = 5 animals) and immobilized group (IMMO) (n = 6) animals in each gastrointestinal segment. Gastrointestinal distribution of orally-administrated [3H]Inulin. ST: Stomach, I1 to I6: Intestine equivalent segments from duodenal to colon. Data were analyzed by a Linear Mixed Model, being time (T) and immobilization (I) two crossed between-subjects factors, and gastrointestinal segment (G) the within-subjects factor (repeated measures). Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) method was used to fit the model. According to Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), a heterogeneous Toeplitz covariance structure was finally chosen. Only significant differences among the gastrointestinal segments were detected (G, p = 0.000).
Figure 5Muscle fiber size in immobilized Wistar rats. (A) Representative images of muscle tissue sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin. (B) Muscle fiber cross-sectional area (pixels) of soleus muscle was determined on randomly chosen 100 individual fibers per animal by the Matic Image Plus 2. Bars and segments represents the mean values ± SEM for each group: day 7: CONTROL (n = 3) and immobilized group (IMMO) (n = 5); day 14: CONTROL (n = 6) and immobilized group (IMMO) (n = 11); day 28: CONTROL (n = 4) and immobilized group (IMMO) (n = 5). Statistical significance of the results were assessed by a full factorial two-way ANOVA (fixed factors: I = immobilization, T = Time; IxT denotes the interaction term): I, p = 0.000; T, p = 0.028; IxT, p = ns.