Literature DB >> 28423938

Validation of the Turkish Version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen.

Burcu Balam Yavuz1, Hacer Dogan Varan1, Rónán O'Caoimh2,3, Muhammet Cemal Kizilarslanoglu1, Mustafa Kemal Kilic1, D William Molloy2, Rana Tuna Dogrul1, Erdem Karabulut4, Anton Svendrovski5, Aykut Sağır1, Eylem Sahin Cankurtaran6, Yusuf Yesil1, Mehmet Emin Kuyumcu1, Meltem Halil1, Mustafa Cankurtaran1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to validate the Turkish version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Q mci-TR) screen.
METHODS: In total, 100 patients aged ≥65 years referred to a geriatric outpatient clinic with memory loss were included. The Q mci was compared to the Turkish versions of the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
RESULTS: The Q mci-TR had higher accuracy than the MoCA in discriminating subjective memory complaints (SMCs) from cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment [MCI] or dementia), of borderline significance after adjusting for age and education ( P = .06). The Q mci-TR also had higher accuracy than the MoCA in differentiating MCI from SMC, which became nonsignificant after adjustment ( P = .15). A similar pattern was shown for distinguishing MCI from dementia. Test reliability for the Q mci-TR was strong.
CONCLUSION: The Q mci-TR is a reliable and useful screening tool for discriminating MCI from SMC and dementia in a Turkish population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment screen; cognitive screening; dementia; mild cognitive impairment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28423938     DOI: 10.1177/1533317517691122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen        ISSN: 1533-3175            Impact factor:   2.035


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the Greek Version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Older Adults.

Authors:  Lambros Messinis; Grigorios Nasios; Antonios Mougias; Panayiotis Patrikelis; Sonia Malefaki; Vasileios Panagiotopoulos; Aikaterini Ntoskou Messini; Christos Bakirtzis; Nikolaos Grigoriadis; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Stella Bairami; Valentina Papadopoulou; Phillipos Gourzis
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Taiwan version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment screen.

Authors:  Meng-Ta Lee; Wan-Ying Chang; Yuh Jang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Validity of the Japanese Version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen.

Authors:  Ayako Morita; Rónán O'Caoimh; Hiroshi Murayama; D William Molloy; Shigeru Inoue; Yugo Shobugawa; Takeo Fujiwara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Two Cognitive Screening Instruments in Different Dementia Subtypes and Clinical Depression.

Authors:  Rónán O'Caoimh; D William Molloy
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-08

5.  Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen.

Authors:  Yangfan Xu; Yangyang Lin; Lingrong Yi; Zhao Li; Xian Li; Yuying Yu; Yuxiao Guo; Yuling Wang; Haoying Jiang; Zhuoming Chen; Anton Svendrovski; Yang Gao; D William Molloy; Rónán O'Caoimh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-03

Review 6.  Evaluation of Available Cognitive Tools Used to Measure Mild Cognitive Decline: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Chian Thong Chun; Kirsty Seward; Amanda Patterson; Alice Melton; Lesley MacDonald-Wicks
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.